Biliary phosphatidylcholine and lysophosphatidylcholine profiles in sclerosing cholangitis

AIM:To analyze phospholipid profiles in intrahepatic bile from patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis(PSC)and secondary sclerosing cholangitis(SSC).METHODS:Intrahepatic bile specimens collected via endoscopic retrograde cholangiography from 41 patients were analyzed.Fourteen of these patients were diagnosed with PSC,10 with SSC,11 with choledocholithiasis or no identifiable biliary disease,and 6 with cholangiocellular carcinoma(CCC).Bile acid,cholesterol,protein,and bilirubin contents as well as pancreas lipase activity in bile were determined by biochemical methods.Phosphatidylcholine(PC)and lysophosphatidylcholine(LPC)species were quantified using nanoelectrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry.RESULTS:Bile from all the examined patient groups showed a remarkably similar PC and LPC species composition,with only minor statistical differences.Total biliary PC concentrations were highest in controls(8030±1843 mol/L)and lowest in patients with CCC(1969±981 mol/L)(P=0.005,controls vs SSC and CCC,respectively,P<0.05).LPC contents in bile were overall low(4.2%±1.8%).Biliary LPC/PC ratios and ratios of biliary PC to bilirubin,PC to cholesterol,PC to protein,and PC to bile acids showed no intergroup differences.CONCLUSION:PC and LPC profiles being similar in patients with or without sclerosing cholangitis,these phospholipids are likely not of major pathogenetic importance in this disease group.

Successful combination of direct antiviral agents in livertransplanted patients with recurrent hepatitis C virus

AIM To analyze the safety and efficiency of direct-actingantiviral(DAA) regimens in liver-transplanted patients with hepatitis C virus(HCV) reinfection.METHODS Between January 2014 and December 2016, 39 patients with HCV reinfection after liver transplantation were treated at our tertiary referral center with sofosbuvir(SOF)-based regimens, including various combinations with interferon(IFN), daclatasvir(DAC), simeprivir(SIM) and/or ledipasvir(LDV). Thirteen patients were treated with SOF + IFN ± RBV. Ten patients were treated with SOF + DAC ± RBV. Fiveteen patients were treated with fixed-dose combination of SOF + LDV ± RBV. One patient was treated with SOF + SIM + RBV. Three patients with relapse were retreated with SOF + LDV + RBV. The treatment duration was 12-24 wk in all cases. The decision about the HCV treatment was made by specialists at our transplant center, according to current available or recommended medications.RESULTS The majority of patients were IFN-experienced(29/39, 74.4%) and had a history of hepatocellular carcinoma(26/39, 66.7%) before liver transplantation. Sustained virological response at 12 wk(SVR12) was achieved in 10/13(76.9%) of patients treated with SOF + IFN ± RBV. All patients with relapse were treated with fixed-dose combination of SOF + LDV + RBV. Patients treated with SOF + DAC + RBV or SOF + LDV + RBV achieved 100% SVR12. SVR rates after combination treatment with inhibitors of the HCV nonstructural protein(NS)5 A and NS5 B for 24 wk were significantly higher, as compared to all other therapy regimens(P = 0.007). Liver function was stable or even improved in the majority of patients during treatment. All antiviral therapies were safe and well-tolerated, without need of discontinuation of treatment or dose adjustment of immunosuppression. No serious adverse events or any harm to the liver graft became overt. No patient experienced acute cellular rejection during the study period. CONCLUSION Our cohort of liver-transplanted patients achieved high rates of SVR12 after a 24-wk course of treatment, especially with combination of NS5 A and NS5 B inhibitors.