Aims Variation in precipitation strongly influences plant growth,species distributions and genetic diversity.intraspecific variation in pheno-typic plasticity,the ability of a genotype to alter its growth,morphol-ogy ...Aims Variation in precipitation strongly influences plant growth,species distributions and genetic diversity.intraspecific variation in pheno-typic plasticity,the ability of a genotype to alter its growth,morphol-ogy or physiology in response to the environment,could influence species responses to changing precipitation and climate change.Despite this,the patterns and mechanisms of intraspecific varia-tion in plasticity to variable precipitation,and the degree to which genotype responses to precipitation are influenced by variation in edaphic conditions,remain poorly understood.Thus,we determined whether genotypes of a widespread C_(4) grass(Panicum virgatum L.,switchgrass)varied in aboveground productivity in response to changes in precipitation,and if site edaphic conditions modified genotype aboveground productivity responses to precipitation.We also determined if genotype productivity responses to precipitation are related to plasticity in underlying growth and phenological traits.Methods Nine P.virgatum genotypes originating from an aridity gradient were grown under four treatments spanning the 10th to the 90th percentiles of annual precipitation at two sites in central Texas:one site with deep,fine-textured soils and another site with shallow,coarse-textured soils.We measured volumetric soil water content(VWC),aboveground net primary productivity(ANPP),tiller pro-duction(tiller number),average tiller mass,canopy height,leaf area index(LAi)and flowering time on all plants at both sites and examined genotype responses to changes in precipitation.Important Findings Across precipitation treatments,VWC was 39%lower and more variable at the site with shallow,coarse-textured soils compared to the site with deep,fine-textured soils.ANPP averaged across genotypes and precipita-tion treatments was also 103%higher at the site with deep,fine-textured soils relative to the site with shallow,coarse-textured soils,indicating substantial differences in site water limitation.Where site water limi-tation was higher,ANPP of most genotypes increased with increasing precipitation.Where site water limitation was less,genotypes expressed variable plasticity in response to precipitation,from no change to almost a 5-fold increase in ANPP with increasing precipitation.Genotype ANPP increased with greater tiller mass,LAi and later flowering time at both sites,but not with tiller number at either site.Genotype ANPP plasticity increased with genotype tiller mass and LAi plasticity at the site with deep,fine-textured soils,and only with genotype tiller mass plasticity at the site with shallow,coarse-textured soils.Thus,variation in genotype ANPP plasticity was explained primarily by variation in tiller and leaf growth.Genotype ANPP plasticity was not associated with temperature or aridity at the genotype’s origin.Edaphic factors such as soil depth and texture may alter genotype ANPP responses to precipitation,and the underlying growth traits contributing to the ANPP response.Thus,edaphic factors may contribute to spatial variation in genotype performance and success under altered precipitation.展开更多
基金USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.D.B.L.acknowledges support from USDA-NIFA postdoctoral fellowship(2011-67012-30696)P.A.F.acknowledges support from USDA-NIFA(2010-65615-20632)Funding.the National Science Foundation Plant Genome Research Program(IOS-0922457)to T.E.J.,C.V.H.and P.A.F.Conflict of interest statement.None declared。
文摘Aims Variation in precipitation strongly influences plant growth,species distributions and genetic diversity.intraspecific variation in pheno-typic plasticity,the ability of a genotype to alter its growth,morphol-ogy or physiology in response to the environment,could influence species responses to changing precipitation and climate change.Despite this,the patterns and mechanisms of intraspecific varia-tion in plasticity to variable precipitation,and the degree to which genotype responses to precipitation are influenced by variation in edaphic conditions,remain poorly understood.Thus,we determined whether genotypes of a widespread C_(4) grass(Panicum virgatum L.,switchgrass)varied in aboveground productivity in response to changes in precipitation,and if site edaphic conditions modified genotype aboveground productivity responses to precipitation.We also determined if genotype productivity responses to precipitation are related to plasticity in underlying growth and phenological traits.Methods Nine P.virgatum genotypes originating from an aridity gradient were grown under four treatments spanning the 10th to the 90th percentiles of annual precipitation at two sites in central Texas:one site with deep,fine-textured soils and another site with shallow,coarse-textured soils.We measured volumetric soil water content(VWC),aboveground net primary productivity(ANPP),tiller pro-duction(tiller number),average tiller mass,canopy height,leaf area index(LAi)and flowering time on all plants at both sites and examined genotype responses to changes in precipitation.Important Findings Across precipitation treatments,VWC was 39%lower and more variable at the site with shallow,coarse-textured soils compared to the site with deep,fine-textured soils.ANPP averaged across genotypes and precipita-tion treatments was also 103%higher at the site with deep,fine-textured soils relative to the site with shallow,coarse-textured soils,indicating substantial differences in site water limitation.Where site water limi-tation was higher,ANPP of most genotypes increased with increasing precipitation.Where site water limitation was less,genotypes expressed variable plasticity in response to precipitation,from no change to almost a 5-fold increase in ANPP with increasing precipitation.Genotype ANPP increased with greater tiller mass,LAi and later flowering time at both sites,but not with tiller number at either site.Genotype ANPP plasticity increased with genotype tiller mass and LAi plasticity at the site with deep,fine-textured soils,and only with genotype tiller mass plasticity at the site with shallow,coarse-textured soils.Thus,variation in genotype ANPP plasticity was explained primarily by variation in tiller and leaf growth.Genotype ANPP plasticity was not associated with temperature or aridity at the genotype’s origin.Edaphic factors such as soil depth and texture may alter genotype ANPP responses to precipitation,and the underlying growth traits contributing to the ANPP response.Thus,edaphic factors may contribute to spatial variation in genotype performance and success under altered precipitation.