Dear Editor,We read with interest the Meta-analysis conducted by Chen et al[1]on the clinical outcomes and complication rates between femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery(FLACS)and conventional phacoemulsificat...Dear Editor,We read with interest the Meta-analysis conducted by Chen et al[1]on the clinical outcomes and complication rates between femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery(FLACS)and conventional phacoemulsification cataract surgery(CPCS).The authors reported no statistical difference between both methods for all measured complications except posterior capsular tear,with CPCS displaying a higher rate of posterior capsular tear.Since its inception in 2011[2].展开更多
文摘Dear Editor,We read with interest the Meta-analysis conducted by Chen et al[1]on the clinical outcomes and complication rates between femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery(FLACS)and conventional phacoemulsification cataract surgery(CPCS).The authors reported no statistical difference between both methods for all measured complications except posterior capsular tear,with CPCS displaying a higher rate of posterior capsular tear.Since its inception in 2011[2].
