Assessing the feasibility and appropriateness of introducing a national health insurance scheme in Malawi

Background:In May 2015 the Malawian Ministry of Health(MOH)contacted the German Development Cooperation to seek technical assistance from the P4H Network for Social Health Protection for an“Assessment of the appropriateness and feasibility of National Health Insurance in Malawi”against two alternative options:continuing with a tax(and donor)-funded National Health Service,and introducing a purchaser-provider split without a revenue collection function.Methods:A health financing benchmarking matrix was agreed with MOH,with six domains corresponding to six objectives:revenue mobilisation,technical efficiency,equity,financial risk protection,policy coordination,and health outcomes.The assessment comprised key informant interviews with Malawian stakeholders,a review of the relevant literature and datasets,rapid assessments of the Malawi Revenue Authority(MRA)and the Unified Beneficiary Registry(UBR),and projections of the National Health Insurance Scheme’s(NHIS)revenue collection costs and benefits.Results:A key finding was that introducing NHIS in Malawi would increase revenues for health,but these would come predominantly from the formal sector and would be unlikely to cover the health sector funding gap.The performance of existing poverty identification and targeting mechanisms was not commensurate with the requirements of a NHIS.Incentives to enrol in NHI are insufficient to reach scale unless service fees be introduced,which would negatively affect equity and financial risk protection.The assessment identified the Purchaser Scenario as the most favourable reform model.Conclusions:As ever more countries look towards implementing National Health Insurance,the proposed assessment framework can provide an orientation for evidence-based policy making in the area of health financing.