Around 1945, Alfred Tarski proposed several questions concerning the elementary theory of non-abelian free groups. These remained open for 60 years until they were proved by O. Kharlampovich and A. Myasnikov and indep...Around 1945, Alfred Tarski proposed several questions concerning the elementary theory of non-abelian free groups. These remained open for 60 years until they were proved by O. Kharlampovich and A. Myasnikov and independently by Z. Sela. The proofs, by both sets of authors, were monumental and involved the development of several new areas of infinite group theory. In this paper we explain precisely the Tarski problems and what has been actually proved. We then discuss the history of the solution as well as the components of the proof. We then provide the basic strategy for the proof. We finish this paper with a brief discussion of elementary free groups.展开更多
The Tarski theorems, proved by Myasnikov and Kharlampovich and inde-pendently by Sela say that all nonabelian free groups satisfy the same first-order or elementary theory. Kharlampovich and Myasnikov also prove that ...The Tarski theorems, proved by Myasnikov and Kharlampovich and inde-pendently by Sela say that all nonabelian free groups satisfy the same first-order or elementary theory. Kharlampovich and Myasnikov also prove that the elementary theory of free groups is decidable. For a group ring they have proved that the first-order theory (in the language of ring theory) is not decidable and have studied equations over group rings, especially for torsion-free hyperbolic groups. In this note we examine and survey extensions of Tarksi-like results to the collection of group rings and examine relationships between the universal and elementary theories of the corresponding groups and rings and the corresponding universal theory of the formed group ring. To accomplish this we introduce different first-order languages with equality whose model classes are respectively groups, rings and group rings. We prove that if R[G] is elementarily equivalent to S[H] then simultaneously the group G is elementarily equivalent to the group H and the ring R is elementarily equivalent to the ring S with respect to the appropriate languages. Further if G is universally equivalent to a nonabelian free group F and R is universally equivalent to the integers Z then R[G] is universally equivalent to Z[F] again with respect to an ap-propriate language.展开更多
Let <em>G</em> be a group. <em>G</em> is right-orderable provided it admits a total order ≤ satisfying <em>hg</em><sub>1</sub> <span style="white-space:normal;&...Let <em>G</em> be a group. <em>G</em> is right-orderable provided it admits a total order ≤ satisfying <em>hg</em><sub>1</sub> <span style="white-space:normal;">≤ <span style="white-space:normal;"><em>hg</em><sub>2 </sub></span></span>whenever <em style="white-space:normal;">g</em><sub style="white-space:normal;">1</sub><span style="white-space:normal;"> </span><span style="white-space:normal;">≤ <i>g</i><sub>2</sub></span>. <em>G</em> is orderable provided it admits a total order ≤ satisfying both: <em style="white-space:normal;">hg</em><sub style="white-space:normal;">1</sub><span style="white-space:normal;"> </span><span style="white-space:normal;">≤ <em>hg</em><sub>2</sub></span> whenever <span style="white-space:nowrap;"><em>g</em><sub>1</sub> ≤ <em>g</em><sub>2</sub></span> and <em style="white-space:normal;">g</em><sub style="white-space:normal;">1</sub><em style="white-space:normal;">h</em><span style="white-space:normal;"> ≤ </span><em style="white-space:normal;">g</em><sub style="white-space:normal;">2</sub><em style="white-space:normal;">h</em> whenever <em>g</em><sub>1</sub> ≤ <em>g</em><sub>2</sub>. A classical result shows that free groups are orderable. In this paper, we prove that left-orderable groups and orderable groups are quasivarieties of groups both with undecidable theory. For orderable groups, we find an explicit set of universal axioms.展开更多
文摘Around 1945, Alfred Tarski proposed several questions concerning the elementary theory of non-abelian free groups. These remained open for 60 years until they were proved by O. Kharlampovich and A. Myasnikov and independently by Z. Sela. The proofs, by both sets of authors, were monumental and involved the development of several new areas of infinite group theory. In this paper we explain precisely the Tarski problems and what has been actually proved. We then discuss the history of the solution as well as the components of the proof. We then provide the basic strategy for the proof. We finish this paper with a brief discussion of elementary free groups.
文摘The Tarski theorems, proved by Myasnikov and Kharlampovich and inde-pendently by Sela say that all nonabelian free groups satisfy the same first-order or elementary theory. Kharlampovich and Myasnikov also prove that the elementary theory of free groups is decidable. For a group ring they have proved that the first-order theory (in the language of ring theory) is not decidable and have studied equations over group rings, especially for torsion-free hyperbolic groups. In this note we examine and survey extensions of Tarksi-like results to the collection of group rings and examine relationships between the universal and elementary theories of the corresponding groups and rings and the corresponding universal theory of the formed group ring. To accomplish this we introduce different first-order languages with equality whose model classes are respectively groups, rings and group rings. We prove that if R[G] is elementarily equivalent to S[H] then simultaneously the group G is elementarily equivalent to the group H and the ring R is elementarily equivalent to the ring S with respect to the appropriate languages. Further if G is universally equivalent to a nonabelian free group F and R is universally equivalent to the integers Z then R[G] is universally equivalent to Z[F] again with respect to an ap-propriate language.
文摘Let <em>G</em> be a group. <em>G</em> is right-orderable provided it admits a total order ≤ satisfying <em>hg</em><sub>1</sub> <span style="white-space:normal;">≤ <span style="white-space:normal;"><em>hg</em><sub>2 </sub></span></span>whenever <em style="white-space:normal;">g</em><sub style="white-space:normal;">1</sub><span style="white-space:normal;"> </span><span style="white-space:normal;">≤ <i>g</i><sub>2</sub></span>. <em>G</em> is orderable provided it admits a total order ≤ satisfying both: <em style="white-space:normal;">hg</em><sub style="white-space:normal;">1</sub><span style="white-space:normal;"> </span><span style="white-space:normal;">≤ <em>hg</em><sub>2</sub></span> whenever <span style="white-space:nowrap;"><em>g</em><sub>1</sub> ≤ <em>g</em><sub>2</sub></span> and <em style="white-space:normal;">g</em><sub style="white-space:normal;">1</sub><em style="white-space:normal;">h</em><span style="white-space:normal;"> ≤ </span><em style="white-space:normal;">g</em><sub style="white-space:normal;">2</sub><em style="white-space:normal;">h</em> whenever <em>g</em><sub>1</sub> ≤ <em>g</em><sub>2</sub>. A classical result shows that free groups are orderable. In this paper, we prove that left-orderable groups and orderable groups are quasivarieties of groups both with undecidable theory. For orderable groups, we find an explicit set of universal axioms.