In his 1969 book,Experience in Hepatic Transplantation,Thomas E Starzl wrote:“the unequivocal indication for the operation of liver replacement was originally considered to be primary hepatic malignancy which could n...In his 1969 book,Experience in Hepatic Transplantation,Thomas E Starzl wrote:“the unequivocal indication for the operation of liver replacement was originally considered to be primary hepatic malignancy which could not be treated with conventional techniques of subtotal liver resection”[1].Thus,it was not surprising that many cases in the early reported series of orthotopic liver transplantation(OLT)were for malignant indications[2-4].展开更多
文摘In his 1969 book,Experience in Hepatic Transplantation,Thomas E Starzl wrote:“the unequivocal indication for the operation of liver replacement was originally considered to be primary hepatic malignancy which could not be treated with conventional techniques of subtotal liver resection”[1].Thus,it was not surprising that many cases in the early reported series of orthotopic liver transplantation(OLT)were for malignant indications[2-4].
