Background:Health reform is a fundamentally political process.Yet,evidence on the interplay between domestic politics,international aid and the technical dimensions of health systems,particularly in the former Soviet ...Background:Health reform is a fundamentally political process.Yet,evidence on the interplay between domestic politics,international aid and the technical dimensions of health systems,particularly in the former Soviet Union and Central Asia,remains limited.Little regard has been given to the political dimensions of Tajikistan’s Basic Benefit Package(BBP)reforms that regulate entitlements to a guaranteed set of healthcare services while introducing co-payments.The objective of this paper is therefore to explore the governance constraints to the introduction and implementation of the BBP and associated health management changes.Methods:This qualitative study draws on literature review and key informant interviews.Data analysis was guided by a political economy framework exploring the interplay between structural and institutional features on the one hand and agency dynamics on the other.Building on that the article presents the main themes that emerged on structure-agency dynamics,forming the key governance constraints to the BBP reform and implementation.Results:Policy incoherence,parallel and competing central government mandates,and regulatory fragmentation,have emerged as dominant drivers of most other constraints to effective design and implementation of the BBP and associated health reforms in Tajikistan:overcharging and informal payments,a weak link between budgeting and policymaking,a practice of non-transparent budget bargaining instead of a rationalisation of health expenditure,little donor harmonisation,and weak accountability to citizens.Conclusion:This study suggests that policy incoherence and regulatory fragmentation can be linked to the neopatrimonial character of the regime and donor behaviour,with detrimental consequences for the health system..These findings raise questions on the unintended effects of non-harmonised piloting of health reforms,and the interaction of health financing and management interventions with entrenched power relations.Ultimately these insights serve to underline the relevance of contextualising health programmes and addressing policy incoherence with long horizon planning as a priority.展开更多
基金support from the Swiss National Science Foundation and the Freiwillige Akademische Gesellschaft Basel。
文摘Background:Health reform is a fundamentally political process.Yet,evidence on the interplay between domestic politics,international aid and the technical dimensions of health systems,particularly in the former Soviet Union and Central Asia,remains limited.Little regard has been given to the political dimensions of Tajikistan’s Basic Benefit Package(BBP)reforms that regulate entitlements to a guaranteed set of healthcare services while introducing co-payments.The objective of this paper is therefore to explore the governance constraints to the introduction and implementation of the BBP and associated health management changes.Methods:This qualitative study draws on literature review and key informant interviews.Data analysis was guided by a political economy framework exploring the interplay between structural and institutional features on the one hand and agency dynamics on the other.Building on that the article presents the main themes that emerged on structure-agency dynamics,forming the key governance constraints to the BBP reform and implementation.Results:Policy incoherence,parallel and competing central government mandates,and regulatory fragmentation,have emerged as dominant drivers of most other constraints to effective design and implementation of the BBP and associated health reforms in Tajikistan:overcharging and informal payments,a weak link between budgeting and policymaking,a practice of non-transparent budget bargaining instead of a rationalisation of health expenditure,little donor harmonisation,and weak accountability to citizens.Conclusion:This study suggests that policy incoherence and regulatory fragmentation can be linked to the neopatrimonial character of the regime and donor behaviour,with detrimental consequences for the health system..These findings raise questions on the unintended effects of non-harmonised piloting of health reforms,and the interaction of health financing and management interventions with entrenched power relations.Ultimately these insights serve to underline the relevance of contextualising health programmes and addressing policy incoherence with long horizon planning as a priority.
