Objective： To study the timing of Bevacizumab （BVC） in the overall treatment strategy of advanced metastatic colorectal cancer - early use （first-line） or later use. Methods： 41 patients with progressive metasta...Objective： To study the timing of Bevacizumab （BVC） in the overall treatment strategy of advanced metastatic colorectal cancer - early use （first-line） or later use. Methods： 41 patients with progressive metastatic colorectal carcinoma were included. Patients were randomized to receive chemotherapy with or without BVC. Primary end point was objective response. Secondary end points were median survival, time to tumor progression, and toxicity. Results： Partial response with second-line BVC group constituted 25% and 18.8% in patients with first-line chemotherapy and BVC-based regimen respectively, compared to 11.8% and 5.9% with second-line chemotherapy. Median time to progression was 3.1 vs. 2.3 months for cases with first-line chemotherapy and BVC-based regimens respectively. Median survival was 8.2 vs. 4 months in both groups respectively （P = 0.019）. Conclusion： Second-line chemotherapy combined BVC had higher disease control rate （partial response and stable disease）, median time to progression and median survival in BVC-naive patients compared to patients with first-line BVC-based therapy. BVC should be maintained in the second- and third-line settings, as cases with BVC discontinuation had significantly lower median time to disease progression and median survival. Selection of patients for use of BVC was recommended with taking into consideration the cost-benefit value and that the discontinuation of BVC would increase tumor progression.展开更多
文摘Objective： To study the timing of Bevacizumab （BVC） in the overall treatment strategy of advanced metastatic colorectal cancer - early use （first-line） or later use. Methods： 41 patients with progressive metastatic colorectal carcinoma were included. Patients were randomized to receive chemotherapy with or without BVC. Primary end point was objective response. Secondary end points were median survival, time to tumor progression, and toxicity. Results： Partial response with second-line BVC group constituted 25% and 18.8% in patients with first-line chemotherapy and BVC-based regimen respectively, compared to 11.8% and 5.9% with second-line chemotherapy. Median time to progression was 3.1 vs. 2.3 months for cases with first-line chemotherapy and BVC-based regimens respectively. Median survival was 8.2 vs. 4 months in both groups respectively （P = 0.019）. Conclusion： Second-line chemotherapy combined BVC had higher disease control rate （partial response and stable disease）, median time to progression and median survival in BVC-naive patients compared to patients with first-line BVC-based therapy. BVC should be maintained in the second- and third-line settings, as cases with BVC discontinuation had significantly lower median time to disease progression and median survival. Selection of patients for use of BVC was recommended with taking into consideration the cost-benefit value and that the discontinuation of BVC would increase tumor progression.
