期刊文献+
共找到2篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
International consensus guidelines on robotic pancreatic surgery in 2023 被引量:7
1
作者 Rong Liu Mohammed Abu Hilal +32 位作者 Marc G.Besselink Thilo Hackert Chinnusamy Palanivelu Yupei Zhao Jin He Ugo Boggi Jin-Young Jang Fabrizio Panaro Brian K.P.Goh Mikhail Efanov Yuichi Nagakawa Hong-Jin Kim Xiaoyu Yin Zhiming Zhao Yi-Ming Shyr Shridhar Iyer eli kakiashvili Ho-Seong Han Jae Hoon Lee Roland Croner Marco Vito Marino Arun Prasad Wei Wang Songqing He Kehu Yang Qu Liu Zizheng Wang Mengyang Li Shuai Xu Kongyuan Wei Zhaoda Deng Yuze Jia Tess M.E.van Ramshorst 《Hepatobiliary Surgery and Nutrition》 SCIE 2024年第1期89-104,共16页
Background:With the rapid development of robotic surgery,especially for the abdominal surgery,robotic pancreatic surgery(RPS)has been applied increasingly around the world.However,evidence-based guidelines regarding i... Background:With the rapid development of robotic surgery,especially for the abdominal surgery,robotic pancreatic surgery(RPS)has been applied increasingly around the world.However,evidence-based guidelines regarding its application,safety,and efficacy are still lacking.To harvest robust evidence and comprehensive clinical practice,this study aims to develop international guidelines on the use of RPS.Methods:World Health Organization(WHO)Handbook for Guideline Development,GRADE Grid method,Delphi vote,and the AGREE-II instrument were used to establish the Guideline Steering Group,Guideline Development Group,and Guideline Secretary Group,formulate 19 clinical questions,develop the recommendations,and draft the guidelines.Three online meetings were held on 04/12/2020,30/11/2021,and 25/01/2022 to vote on the recommendations and get advice and suggestions from all involved experts.All the experts focusing on minimally invasive surgery from America,Europe and Oceania made great contributions to this consensus guideline.Results:After a systematic literature review 176 studies were included,19 questions were addressed and 14 recommendations were developed through the expert assessment and comprehensive judgment of the quality and credibility of the evidence.Conclusions:The international RPS guidelines can guide current practice for surgeons,patients,medical societies,hospital administrators,and related social communities.Further randomized trials are required to determine the added value of RPS as compared to open and laparoscopic surgery. 展开更多
关键词 Robotic surgery GUIDELINES PANCREATECTOMY PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY distal pancreatectomy(DP)
原文传递
International consensus statement on robotic pancreatic surgery 被引量:36
2
作者 Rong Liu Go Wakabayashi +23 位作者 Chinnusamy Palanivelu Allan Tsung Kehu Yang Brian KPGoh Charing Ching-Ning Chong Chang Moo Kang Chenghong Peng eli kakiashvili Ho-Seong Han Hong-Jin Kim Jin He Jae Hoon Lee Kyoichi Takaori Marco Vito Marino Shen-Nien Wang Tiankang Guo Thilo Hackert Ting-Shuo Huang Yiengpruksawan Anusak Yuman Fong Yuichi Nagakawa Yi-Ming Shyr Yao-Ming Wu Yupei Zhao 《Hepatobiliary Surgery and Nutrition》 SCIE 2019年第4期345-360,共16页
The robotic surgical system has been applied to various types of pancreatic surgery. However, controversies exist regarding a variety of factors including the safety, feasibility, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of r... The robotic surgical system has been applied to various types of pancreatic surgery. However, controversies exist regarding a variety of factors including the safety, feasibility, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of robotic surgery. This study aimed to evaluate the current status of robotic pancreatic surgery and put forth experts' consensus and recommendations to promote its development. Based on the WHO Handbook for Guideline Development, a Consensus Steering Group* and a Consensus Development Group were established to determine the topics, prepare evidence-based documents, and generate recommendations. The GRADE Grid method and Delphi vote were used to formulate the recommendations. A total of 19 topics were analyzed. The first 16 recommendations were generated by GRADE using an evidence-based method (EBM) and focused on the safety, feasibility, indication, techniques, certification of the robotic surgeon, and cost-effectiveness of robotic pancreatic surgery. The remaining three recommendations were based on literature review and expert panel opinion due to insufficient EBM results. Since the current amount of;evidence was low/meager as evaluated by the GRADE method, further randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are needed in the future to validate these recommendations. 展开更多
关键词 ROBOTIC surgery consensus STATEMENT PANCREATECTOMY PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY PANCREATIC ENUCLEATION
原文传递
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部