Albumin-bilirubin score in non-malignant liver diseases should be properly validated

The albumin-bilirubin(ALBI)score to assess the risk of decompensation in patients with initially compensated cirrhosis may improve their prognostic evaluation.This letter critically evaluates the research,which utilizes the ALBI score to forecast decompensation in cirrhosis patients over a three-year period.This score was initially developed to assess liver function in hepatocellular carcinoma,its prognostic utility for non-malignant liver diseases has now been explored,recognizing decompensation as a pivotal event that significantly affects patient’s survival.Some concerns regarding the methodology of this research may be raised,particularly the exclusive use of radiological diagnosis,potentially including patients without definite cirrhosis and thus skewing the decompensation risk assessment.The reported predominance of variceal bleeding as a decompensating event conflicts with established literature,that often reports ascites as the initial decompensation manifestation.The letter highlights the absence of details on esophageal varices and their management,which could introduce bias in evaluating the ALBI score's predictive power.Furthermore,the letter points out the small sample size of patients with high-risk ALBI grades,potentially compromising the score's validity in this context.We suggest prospective future research to investigate the dynamic changes in the ALBI score over time to reinforce the validity of the ALBI score as a predictor of decompensation in non-malignant liver disease.

Esophageal motility abnormalities in gastroesophageal reflux disease

Esophageal motility abnormalities are among the main factors implicated in the pathogenesis of gastroesophageal reflux disease. The recent introduction in clinical and research practice of novel esophageal testing has markedly improved our understanding of the mechanisms contributing to the development of gastroesophageal reflux disease, allowing a better management of patients with this disorder. In this context, the present article intends to provide an overview of the current literature about esophageal motility dysfunctions in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Esophageal manometry, by recording intraluminal pressure, represents the gold standard to diagnose esophagealmotility abnormalities. In particular, using novel techniques, such as high resolution manometry with or without concurrent intraluminal impedance monitoring, transient lower esophageal sphincter (LES) relaxations, hypotensive LES, ineffective esophageal peristalsis and bolus transit abnormalities have been better defined and strongly implicated in gastroesophageal reflux disease development. Overall, recent findings suggest that esophageal motility abnormalities are increasingly prevalent with increasing severity of reflux disease, from nonerosive reflux disease to erosive reflux disease and Barrett's esophagus. Characterizing esophageal dysmotility among different subgroups of patients with reflux disease may represent a fundamental approach to properly diagnose these patients and, thus, to set up the best therapeutic management. Currently, surgery represents the only reliable way to restore the esophagogastric junction integrity and to reduce transient LES relaxations that are considered to be the predominant mechanism by which gastric contents can enter the esophagus. On that ground, more in depth future studies assessing the pathogenetic role of dysmotility in patients with reflux disease are warranted.