Urinary tract injury during hysterectomy:Does surgeon specialty and surgical volume matter?

BACKGROUND Ureteral injury is a known complication of hysterectomies.Recent studies have attempted to correlate surgeon volume and experience with incidence of urinary tract injuries during hysterectomies.Some studies have reported that as surgeon volume increases,urinary tract injury rates decrease.To our knowledge,no studies have assessed the relationship between surgeon subspecialty and the rate of urinary tract injury rates during minimally invasive hysterectomy.AIM To determine the incidence of urinary tract injury between urogynecologists,gynecologic oncologists,and general gynecologists.METHODS The study took place from January 1,2016 to December 1,2021 at a large comm-unity hospital in Detroit,Michigan.We conducted a retrospective chart review of adult patients who underwent minimally invasive hysterectomy.After we identified eligible patients,the surgeon subspecialty was identified and the surgeon’s volume per year was calculated.Patient demographics,medical history,physician-dictated operative reports,and all hospital visits postoperatively were reviewed.RESULTS Urologic injury occurred in four patients(2%)in the general gynecologist group,in one patient(1%)in the gynecologic oncologist group,and in one patient(1%)in the urogynecologist group.When comparing high and low-volume surgeons,there was no statistically significant difference in urinary tract injury(1%vs 2%)or bowel injury(1%vs 0%).There were more complications in the low-volume group vs the high-volume group excluding urinary tract,bowel,or major vessel injury.High-volume surgeons had four(1%)patients with a complication and low-volume surgeons had 12(4%)patients with a complication(P=0.04).CONCLUSION Our study demonstrated that there was no difference in the urinary tract injury rate in general gynecologists vs subspecialists,however our study was underpowered.