The first society would be the society of the good will.Already several times discussed,for which the value-oriented life of this year can no longer become an open problem.We define the second society provisionally as...The first society would be the society of the good will.Already several times discussed,for which the value-oriented life of this year can no longer become an open problem.We define the second society provisionally as the one,which is fundamentally not constituted by the above described good will.In the following,we will try to identify it in this abstract description as the society of the“majority”.We see the third society in that political class or elite,which power has been built in the year 1989 and thus became the concretization of that establishment,with which the“first”society identified itself so totally.This tripartition of the real existing Left might also explain,why its political articulation is so fragmented.A Leftist should have today three souls:one of the winners(the elite,as a member of our third class),one of the losers(as a member of our second class)and one of the man of good will(as a member of our first class),who very enjoyed in its total identification with the own system.And authors have drawn some meaningful conclusions.展开更多
The globalization has a particular relation to the climate change, and conversely, the climate change also has a particular relation to the globalization. They live and exist together and often they are mentioned toge...The globalization has a particular relation to the climate change, and conversely, the climate change also has a particular relation to the globalization. They live and exist together and often they are mentioned together. It is however clear that the globalization can exist problemless without the climate change, while this can also be declared from the climate change. Nature and society have always been in a secret dialogue with each other, forming visible and invisible oppositions, taking over the role of the other and embodying universal values for the other side. Actually, we have an important change in the secret dialog. It is not about the fact, that this change is historical in the history of the nature. Until now, we protected the nature against the society, now we must also protect the society against the nature. The decisive change is the transformation of the idea of the nature protection in a practice of the mutual and double protection of the nature and the society.展开更多
文摘The first society would be the society of the good will.Already several times discussed,for which the value-oriented life of this year can no longer become an open problem.We define the second society provisionally as the one,which is fundamentally not constituted by the above described good will.In the following,we will try to identify it in this abstract description as the society of the“majority”.We see the third society in that political class or elite,which power has been built in the year 1989 and thus became the concretization of that establishment,with which the“first”society identified itself so totally.This tripartition of the real existing Left might also explain,why its political articulation is so fragmented.A Leftist should have today three souls:one of the winners(the elite,as a member of our third class),one of the losers(as a member of our second class)and one of the man of good will(as a member of our first class),who very enjoyed in its total identification with the own system.And authors have drawn some meaningful conclusions.
文摘The globalization has a particular relation to the climate change, and conversely, the climate change also has a particular relation to the globalization. They live and exist together and often they are mentioned together. It is however clear that the globalization can exist problemless without the climate change, while this can also be declared from the climate change. Nature and society have always been in a secret dialogue with each other, forming visible and invisible oppositions, taking over the role of the other and embodying universal values for the other side. Actually, we have an important change in the secret dialog. It is not about the fact, that this change is historical in the history of the nature. Until now, we protected the nature against the society, now we must also protect the society against the nature. The decisive change is the transformation of the idea of the nature protection in a practice of the mutual and double protection of the nature and the society.
