Background The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted general practice worldwide,primarily due to public health measures that restricted access to care for chronic diseases,such as type 2 diabetes.These measures disproportionate...Background The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted general practice worldwide,primarily due to public health measures that restricted access to care for chronic diseases,such as type 2 diabetes.These measures disproportionately affected higher risk groups with type 2 diabetes,such as older people and those with obesity.This study aims to identify factors that may have influenced the rates of compliance with testing guidelines and target glycaemic control in Australian general practice settings during the COVID-19 pandemic.Methods We used a serial cross-sectional study design of patient record data from general practices representative of the Nepean Blue Mountains Local Health District between 2020 and 2022.Aggregated patient records were analysed to determine percentages of subgroups with a blood glycaemic testing interval consistent with guidelines(≥1 within 15 months)and achieving target glycaemic control(by glycated haemoglobin of≤7%).Linear regression models were used to test the association between independent and dependent variables,and to generate regression coefficients and 95%CI,corrected for time trends.Results Of the average 14356 patient records per month,55%were male,53%had a body mass index(BMI)<30 and 55%were aged 55–74 years.Compliance to testing guidelines slightly decreased(75–73%)but was positively associated with male sex(2.5%,95%CI 1.7%,3.4%),BMI≥30(9.6%,95%CI 8.8%,10.4%)and 55–74 years(7.5%,95%CI 6.6%,8.5%)and 75 years and over age groups(7.1%,95%CI 6.2%,7.9%).Mean percentage of patient records achieving target glycaemic control slightly increased and was negatively associated with male sex(-3.7%,95%CI-5.2%,–2.2%),but positively associated with 55–74 years(4.5%,95%CI 3.8%,5.1%)and 75 years and over age groups(12.2%,95%CI 4.5%,20.0%).Compliance to testing guidelines increased with each additional general practice per 10000 persons(8.4%,95%CI 4.9%,11.8%).Conclusions During the COVID-19 pandemic,people with type 2 diabetes in Australia continued to follow glycaemic testing guidelines at the same rate.In fact,there was a slight improvement in glycaemic control among all subgroups of patients,including those at higher risk.These findings are encouraging,but the longer term impact of COVID-19 on type 2 diabetes care is still unclear.展开更多
文摘Background The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted general practice worldwide,primarily due to public health measures that restricted access to care for chronic diseases,such as type 2 diabetes.These measures disproportionately affected higher risk groups with type 2 diabetes,such as older people and those with obesity.This study aims to identify factors that may have influenced the rates of compliance with testing guidelines and target glycaemic control in Australian general practice settings during the COVID-19 pandemic.Methods We used a serial cross-sectional study design of patient record data from general practices representative of the Nepean Blue Mountains Local Health District between 2020 and 2022.Aggregated patient records were analysed to determine percentages of subgroups with a blood glycaemic testing interval consistent with guidelines(≥1 within 15 months)and achieving target glycaemic control(by glycated haemoglobin of≤7%).Linear regression models were used to test the association between independent and dependent variables,and to generate regression coefficients and 95%CI,corrected for time trends.Results Of the average 14356 patient records per month,55%were male,53%had a body mass index(BMI)<30 and 55%were aged 55–74 years.Compliance to testing guidelines slightly decreased(75–73%)but was positively associated with male sex(2.5%,95%CI 1.7%,3.4%),BMI≥30(9.6%,95%CI 8.8%,10.4%)and 55–74 years(7.5%,95%CI 6.6%,8.5%)and 75 years and over age groups(7.1%,95%CI 6.2%,7.9%).Mean percentage of patient records achieving target glycaemic control slightly increased and was negatively associated with male sex(-3.7%,95%CI-5.2%,–2.2%),but positively associated with 55–74 years(4.5%,95%CI 3.8%,5.1%)and 75 years and over age groups(12.2%,95%CI 4.5%,20.0%).Compliance to testing guidelines increased with each additional general practice per 10000 persons(8.4%,95%CI 4.9%,11.8%).Conclusions During the COVID-19 pandemic,people with type 2 diabetes in Australia continued to follow glycaemic testing guidelines at the same rate.In fact,there was a slight improvement in glycaemic control among all subgroups of patients,including those at higher risk.These findings are encouraging,but the longer term impact of COVID-19 on type 2 diabetes care is still unclear.
