背景嵌合抗原受体(CAR)-T细胞免疫疗法已在多发性骨髓瘤(MM)中取得较好的疗效,最常见的靶点为B细胞成熟抗原(BCMA)。单靶点CAR-T细胞免疫疗法的缺点是会导致疾病抵抗和复发,可能与抗原逃逸有关。为此,改进开发了双靶点CAR-T细胞治疗复...背景嵌合抗原受体(CAR)-T细胞免疫疗法已在多发性骨髓瘤(MM)中取得较好的疗效,最常见的靶点为B细胞成熟抗原(BCMA)。单靶点CAR-T细胞免疫疗法的缺点是会导致疾病抵抗和复发,可能与抗原逃逸有关。为此,改进开发了双靶点CAR-T细胞治疗复发难治多发性骨髓瘤(RRMM),此方面尚缺乏系统的临床分析。目的对RRMM患者应用双靶点CAR-T细胞免疫疗法治疗的有效性及安全性进行Meta分析。方法计算机检索PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library、Web of Science、中国知网、万方数据知识服务平台、维普网7个数据库中有关双靶点CAR-T细胞治疗RRMM的单组率研究,检索时限为建库至2023-02-06。由2名研究人员使用自制的数据表单来提取收集数据,并采用非随机对照试验方法学评价指标进行文献质量评价。采用R Studio软件进行数据分析。结果共纳入9篇文献,包括200例既往接受过多线治疗的RRMM患者。双靶点CAR-T细胞疗法根据不同靶点可分为4类:BCMA+CD19、BCMA+CD38,BCMA+跨膜剂与钙调节亲环素配体的相互作用者(TACI)、BCMA+人信号淋巴细胞激活分子家族成员7(CS1),其中BCMA+CD19靶点的研究较多。根据输注形式不同CAR-T细胞疗法可分为4类:双特异性CAR-T细胞、联合或序贯输注两种不同CAR-T细胞、双顺反子结构、共转导。Meta分析显示,双靶点CAR-T细胞治疗RRMM的总缓解率(ORR)为90.0%(95%CI=0.849~0.943),完全缓解率(CRR)为54.6%(95%CI=0.416~0.673),微小残留病(MRD)阴性率为75.6%(95%CI=0.489~0.952),髓外病变(EMD)总缓解率为55.1%(95%CI=0.234~0.851),最后一次随访时的复发率为29.7%(95%CI=0.141~0.454),最后一次随访时的生存率为75.6%(95%CI=0.554~0.915),3~4级细胞释放因子综合征(CRS)发生率为16.4%(95%CI=0.094~0.245),神经毒性(ICANS)发生率为4.0%(95%CI=0~0.120)。敏感性分析提示结果稳定。Egger's检验结果显示,ORR(P=0.03)及EMD总缓解率(P=0.02)提示存在一定的偏倚风险;CRR(P=0.53)、MRD阴性率(P=0.79)、最后一次随访时的复发率(P=0.71)、生存率(P=0.98)、3~4级CRS发生率(P=0.90)、ICANS发生率(P=0.30)提示不存在发表偏倚。结论双靶点CAR-T细胞免疫治疗RRMM显示出良好的疗效和安全性,未来需要多中心、大样本、更长随访期的研究来进一步评估其疗效和安全性。展开更多
Objective To evaluate the outcomes of splenectomy in the treatment of relapsed/refractory autoimmune hemolytic anemia(AIHA).Methods Retrospective analysis was performed in 30 cases with relapsed/refractory AIHA who we...Objective To evaluate the outcomes of splenectomy in the treatment of relapsed/refractory autoimmune hemolytic anemia(AIHA).Methods Retrospective analysis was performed in 30 cases with relapsed/refractory AIHA who were treated with splenectomy in our hospital.The pre-and post-operative blood routine indexes and responses were followed up.Results Among the 30 relapsed/refractory AIHA patients,20 were pure AIHA(including 13 patients with warm antibody AIHA,2 with warm-cold double antibody AIHA and 5 with Coombs negative AIHA)and 10 were Evans syndrome.The short-term response was evaluated 10-14 days after operation,and the overall response rate(ORR)of short-term response was 90%[12 cases in complete response(CR),6 cases in partial response(PR)]in 20 therapeutic evaluable cases.Among 13 patients with long-term follow-up data,except 3 patients with Evans syndrome died(2 cases were refractory to splenectomy,1 case relapsed after surgery),the ORR of 10 patients with relapsed/refractory pure AIHA at 6 months and 12 months were 90%(9/10)and 70%(7/10),respectively,with a median follow-up of 14(4-156)months.At the end of followup,3 cases had maintained CR for more than 3 years.Conclusion The short-term response of splenectomy as a second-line treatment for relapsed/refractory AIHA is satisfactory,and long-term outcome of splenectomy is up to 70%at 1 year.Approximately one-third of patients could maintain sustained remission.展开更多
文摘背景嵌合抗原受体(CAR)-T细胞免疫疗法已在多发性骨髓瘤(MM)中取得较好的疗效,最常见的靶点为B细胞成熟抗原(BCMA)。单靶点CAR-T细胞免疫疗法的缺点是会导致疾病抵抗和复发,可能与抗原逃逸有关。为此,改进开发了双靶点CAR-T细胞治疗复发难治多发性骨髓瘤(RRMM),此方面尚缺乏系统的临床分析。目的对RRMM患者应用双靶点CAR-T细胞免疫疗法治疗的有效性及安全性进行Meta分析。方法计算机检索PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library、Web of Science、中国知网、万方数据知识服务平台、维普网7个数据库中有关双靶点CAR-T细胞治疗RRMM的单组率研究,检索时限为建库至2023-02-06。由2名研究人员使用自制的数据表单来提取收集数据,并采用非随机对照试验方法学评价指标进行文献质量评价。采用R Studio软件进行数据分析。结果共纳入9篇文献,包括200例既往接受过多线治疗的RRMM患者。双靶点CAR-T细胞疗法根据不同靶点可分为4类:BCMA+CD19、BCMA+CD38,BCMA+跨膜剂与钙调节亲环素配体的相互作用者(TACI)、BCMA+人信号淋巴细胞激活分子家族成员7(CS1),其中BCMA+CD19靶点的研究较多。根据输注形式不同CAR-T细胞疗法可分为4类:双特异性CAR-T细胞、联合或序贯输注两种不同CAR-T细胞、双顺反子结构、共转导。Meta分析显示,双靶点CAR-T细胞治疗RRMM的总缓解率(ORR)为90.0%(95%CI=0.849~0.943),完全缓解率(CRR)为54.6%(95%CI=0.416~0.673),微小残留病(MRD)阴性率为75.6%(95%CI=0.489~0.952),髓外病变(EMD)总缓解率为55.1%(95%CI=0.234~0.851),最后一次随访时的复发率为29.7%(95%CI=0.141~0.454),最后一次随访时的生存率为75.6%(95%CI=0.554~0.915),3~4级细胞释放因子综合征(CRS)发生率为16.4%(95%CI=0.094~0.245),神经毒性(ICANS)发生率为4.0%(95%CI=0~0.120)。敏感性分析提示结果稳定。Egger's检验结果显示,ORR(P=0.03)及EMD总缓解率(P=0.02)提示存在一定的偏倚风险;CRR(P=0.53)、MRD阴性率(P=0.79)、最后一次随访时的复发率(P=0.71)、生存率(P=0.98)、3~4级CRS发生率(P=0.90)、ICANS发生率(P=0.30)提示不存在发表偏倚。结论双靶点CAR-T细胞免疫治疗RRMM显示出良好的疗效和安全性,未来需要多中心、大样本、更长随访期的研究来进一步评估其疗效和安全性。
文摘Objective To evaluate the outcomes of splenectomy in the treatment of relapsed/refractory autoimmune hemolytic anemia(AIHA).Methods Retrospective analysis was performed in 30 cases with relapsed/refractory AIHA who were treated with splenectomy in our hospital.The pre-and post-operative blood routine indexes and responses were followed up.Results Among the 30 relapsed/refractory AIHA patients,20 were pure AIHA(including 13 patients with warm antibody AIHA,2 with warm-cold double antibody AIHA and 5 with Coombs negative AIHA)and 10 were Evans syndrome.The short-term response was evaluated 10-14 days after operation,and the overall response rate(ORR)of short-term response was 90%[12 cases in complete response(CR),6 cases in partial response(PR)]in 20 therapeutic evaluable cases.Among 13 patients with long-term follow-up data,except 3 patients with Evans syndrome died(2 cases were refractory to splenectomy,1 case relapsed after surgery),the ORR of 10 patients with relapsed/refractory pure AIHA at 6 months and 12 months were 90%(9/10)and 70%(7/10),respectively,with a median follow-up of 14(4-156)months.At the end of followup,3 cases had maintained CR for more than 3 years.Conclusion The short-term response of splenectomy as a second-line treatment for relapsed/refractory AIHA is satisfactory,and long-term outcome of splenectomy is up to 70%at 1 year.Approximately one-third of patients could maintain sustained remission.
