期刊文献+
共找到2篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
腰骶丛神经阻滞与髂筋膜间隙阻滞在全髋关节置换术中镇痛效果比较 被引量:24
1
作者 胡超力 李成 +3 位作者 王芬 陈明慧 傅舒昆 张晓庆 《同济大学学报(医学版)》 CAS 2018年第3期99-103,共5页
目的比较全身麻醉复合腰骶丛神经阻滞(lumbosacral plexus block,LPB)与髂筋膜间隙阻滞(fascia iliaca compartment block,FICB)在全髋关节置换术中镇痛效果。方法选择择期行全髋关节置换术患者150例,采用随机数字表法随机分为:全身麻... 目的比较全身麻醉复合腰骶丛神经阻滞(lumbosacral plexus block,LPB)与髂筋膜间隙阻滞(fascia iliaca compartment block,FICB)在全髋关节置换术中镇痛效果。方法选择择期行全髋关节置换术患者150例,采用随机数字表法随机分为:全身麻醉复合腰骶丛阻滞组(LPB组,n=50),全身麻醉复合髂筋膜间隙阻滞组(FICB组,n=50)和单纯全身麻醉组(G组,n=50)。3组患者全身麻醉诱导和维持用药相同,术后采用持续静脉自控镇痛(patient controlled analgesia,PCA)至术后48 h。全身麻醉诱导前LPB组行超声引导下腰骶丛神经阻滞,FICB组行超声引导下髂筋膜间隙阻滞。记录术中舒芬太尼使用量,术后1、8、12、24、48 h患者静息状态下疼痛视觉模拟评分(visual analogue scales,VAS),术后不良反应和患者满意度,神经阻滞操作时间、操作时VAS评分及穿刺成功率。结果 LPB组和FICB组术中舒芬太尼用量,术后帕瑞昔布钠使用人次明显少于G组(P<0.05)。LPB组和FICB组在术后1、8、12、24、48 h VAS评分明显低于G组(P<0.05)。LPB组和FICB组48 h患者的满意度明显高于G组(P<0.05)。LPB组在术后8、12、24 h的VAS评分明显低于FICB组。LPB组操作时间明显长于FICB组(P<0.05),穿刺成功率明显低于FIBC组(P<0.05)。结论超声引导下腰骶丛神经阻滞与髂筋膜间隙阻滞应用于全髋关节置换术均可以取得良好的镇痛效果,腰骶丛神经阻滞镇痛效果更佳且镇痛时间更长,但腰骶丛神经阻滞操作难度较大,失败率较高。 展开更多
关键词 髂筋膜间隙阻滞 腰丛神经阻滞 骶丛神经阻滞 全髋关节置换术 术后镇痛
下载PDF
Ultrasound guidance for brachial plexus block decreases the incidence of complete hemi-diaphragmatic paresis or vascular punctures and improves success rate of brachial plexus nerve block compared with peripheral nerve stimulator in adults 被引量:6
2
作者 YUAN Jia-min YANG Xiao-hu +4 位作者 fu shu-kun YUAN Chao-qun CHEN Kai LI Jia-yi LI Quan 《Chinese Medical Journal》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2012年第10期1811-1816,共6页
Background The use of traditional techniques (such as landmark techniques, paresthesia and peripheral nerve stimulator) for upper-limb anesthesia has often been restricted to the expert or enthusiast, which was blin... Background The use of traditional techniques (such as landmark techniques, paresthesia and peripheral nerve stimulator) for upper-limb anesthesia has often been restricted to the expert or enthusiast, which was blind. Recently, ultrasound (US) has been applied to differ blood vessel, pleura and nerve, thus may reduce the risk of complications while have a high rate of success. The aim of this study was to determine if the use of ultrasound guidance (vs. peripheral nerve stimulator, (PNS)) decreases risk of vascular puncture, risk of hemi-diaphragmatic paresis and risk of Homer syndrome and improves the success rate of nerve block. Methods A search strategy was developed to identify randomized control trials (RCTs) reporting on complications of US and PNS guidance for upper-extremity peripheral nerve blocks (brachial plexus) in adults available through PubMed databases, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase databases, SinoMed databases and Wanfang data (date up to 2011-12-20). Two independent reviewers appraised eligible studies and extracted data. Risk ratios (OR) were calculated for each outcome and presented with 95% confidence intervals (CI) with the software of Review Manager 5.1.0 System (Cochrane Library). Results Sixteen trials involving 1321 adults met our criteria were included for analysis. Blocks performed using US guidance were more likely to be successful (risk ratio (RR) for block success 0.36, 95% CI 0.23-0.56, P 〈0.00001), decreased incidence of vascular puncture during block performance (RR 0.13, 95% CI 0.06-0.27, P 〈0.00001), decreased the risk of complete hemi-diaphragmatic paresis (RR 0.09, 95% CI 0.03-0.52, P=-0.0001). Conclusions US decreases risks of complete hemi-diaphragmatic paresis or vascular puncture and improves success rate of brachial plexus nerve block compared with techniques that utilize PNS for nerve localization. Larger studies are needed to determine whether or not the use of US can decrease risk of neurologic complications. 展开更多
关键词 ultrasound brachial plexus block peripheral nerve stimulator
原文传递
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部