Background: A previous report evaluated the initial 310 cementless, Buechel-Pappas (B-P), Semi-Constrained Rotating Platform total knee replacements in 257 patients followed for an average of 7.6 years, range 2 - 18 y...Background: A previous report evaluated the initial 310 cementless, Buechel-Pappas (B-P), Semi-Constrained Rotating Platform total knee replacements in 257 patients followed for an average of 7.6 years, range 2 - 18 years. Diagnoses were osteoarthritis in 233 patients, post traumatic arthritis in 4 patients and rheumatoid arthritis in 22 patients. Knee Scores, using a strict knee scoring scale were 86.4% excellent, 12.3% good, 0.3% fair and 1.0% poor results. Survivorship, using an end point of revision for any mechanical reason (including component loosening, bearing wear and bearing dislocation) was 99.4%. Survivorship for a poor knee score (including persistent pain, loosening, instability and infection was 97.6%. The purpose of the present study is to report the updated results of this same patient cohort at a minimum follow-up of twenty years. Methods: The average age of patients at the time of surgery was 67 years, range 34 to 91 years. A total of 20 patients (22 knees) were still living, with a follow-up of 20 - 30 years (mean 23.47 years). The same strict knee scoring scale and survivorship analysis were used to evaluate patient outcomes at the 20 to 30 years interval. Results: Survivorship, in the current study, using the same end points as in the previous study, was 96.5% at the 20 and 30-year intervals. Late mechanical failure and osteolysis were not identified. Conclusion: This cementless, semi-constrained rotating platform total knee replacement has stood the test of time for more than 20 years and can be considered acceptable for long-term use, in properly selected patients.展开更多
文摘Background: A previous report evaluated the initial 310 cementless, Buechel-Pappas (B-P), Semi-Constrained Rotating Platform total knee replacements in 257 patients followed for an average of 7.6 years, range 2 - 18 years. Diagnoses were osteoarthritis in 233 patients, post traumatic arthritis in 4 patients and rheumatoid arthritis in 22 patients. Knee Scores, using a strict knee scoring scale were 86.4% excellent, 12.3% good, 0.3% fair and 1.0% poor results. Survivorship, using an end point of revision for any mechanical reason (including component loosening, bearing wear and bearing dislocation) was 99.4%. Survivorship for a poor knee score (including persistent pain, loosening, instability and infection was 97.6%. The purpose of the present study is to report the updated results of this same patient cohort at a minimum follow-up of twenty years. Methods: The average age of patients at the time of surgery was 67 years, range 34 to 91 years. A total of 20 patients (22 knees) were still living, with a follow-up of 20 - 30 years (mean 23.47 years). The same strict knee scoring scale and survivorship analysis were used to evaluate patient outcomes at the 20 to 30 years interval. Results: Survivorship, in the current study, using the same end points as in the previous study, was 96.5% at the 20 and 30-year intervals. Late mechanical failure and osteolysis were not identified. Conclusion: This cementless, semi-constrained rotating platform total knee replacement has stood the test of time for more than 20 years and can be considered acceptable for long-term use, in properly selected patients.
