As a result of an error by the authors,in the paper,one of the authors’names,“Xu-Juan Li”,was misspelled.The correct spelling of the name should be“Xiu-Juan Li”.
Thanks to more and more gamma-ray bursts with measured redshift and extended emission detected by the recent space telescopes,it is urgent and possible to check whether those previous energy correlations still satisfy...Thanks to more and more gamma-ray bursts with measured redshift and extended emission detected by the recent space telescopes,it is urgent and possible to check whether those previous energy correlations still satisfy the particular sample involving only the bursts accompanied by tail radiations.Using 20 long and 22 short bursts with extended emission,we find that the popular γ-ray energy correlations of the intrinsic peak energy versus the isotropic energy(Amati relation) and the intrinsic peak energy versus the peak luminosity(Yonetoku relation) do exist in both short and long bursts.However,it is much better if these gamma-ray bursts with extended emissions are reclassified into two subgroups of E-Ⅰ and E-Ⅱ that make the above energy correlations more tight.As proposed by Zhang et al.,the energy correlations can be utilized to distinguish these kinds of gamma-ray bursts in the plane of bolometric fluence versus peak energy as well.Interestingly,the peculiar short GRB 170817 A belongs to the E-Ⅰ group in the fluence versus peak energy plane,but it is an outlier of both the Amati and Yonetoku relations even though the off-axis effect has been corrected.Furthermore,we compare the radiation features between the extended emissions and the prompt gamma-rays in order to search for their possible connections.Taking into account all these factors,we conclude that gamma-ray bursts with extended emission are still required to model with dichotomic groups,namely E-Ⅰ and E-Ⅱ classes,which hint that they might have different origins.展开更多
文摘As a result of an error by the authors,in the paper,one of the authors’names,“Xu-Juan Li”,was misspelled.The correct spelling of the name should be“Xiu-Juan Li”.
基金supported by the Youth Innovations and Talents Project of Shandong Provincial Colleges and Universities(Grant No.201909118)the Natural Science Foundation(Grant Nos.ZR2018MA030,XKJJC201901 and OP201511)supported by a National Research Foundation of Korea Grant funded by the Korean government(NRF2018R1D1A3B070421880 and 2018R1A6A1A06024970)。
文摘Thanks to more and more gamma-ray bursts with measured redshift and extended emission detected by the recent space telescopes,it is urgent and possible to check whether those previous energy correlations still satisfy the particular sample involving only the bursts accompanied by tail radiations.Using 20 long and 22 short bursts with extended emission,we find that the popular γ-ray energy correlations of the intrinsic peak energy versus the isotropic energy(Amati relation) and the intrinsic peak energy versus the peak luminosity(Yonetoku relation) do exist in both short and long bursts.However,it is much better if these gamma-ray bursts with extended emissions are reclassified into two subgroups of E-Ⅰ and E-Ⅱ that make the above energy correlations more tight.As proposed by Zhang et al.,the energy correlations can be utilized to distinguish these kinds of gamma-ray bursts in the plane of bolometric fluence versus peak energy as well.Interestingly,the peculiar short GRB 170817 A belongs to the E-Ⅰ group in the fluence versus peak energy plane,but it is an outlier of both the Amati and Yonetoku relations even though the off-axis effect has been corrected.Furthermore,we compare the radiation features between the extended emissions and the prompt gamma-rays in order to search for their possible connections.Taking into account all these factors,we conclude that gamma-ray bursts with extended emission are still required to model with dichotomic groups,namely E-Ⅰ and E-Ⅱ classes,which hint that they might have different origins.
