北京中医药大学刘存志教授团队于2021年11月10日在Arthritis&Rheumatology杂志发表Efficacy of intensive acupuncture versus sham acupuncture in knee osteoarthritis:a randomized controlled trial(强化针刺对比假针治疗膝骨...北京中医药大学刘存志教授团队于2021年11月10日在Arthritis&Rheumatology杂志发表Efficacy of intensive acupuncture versus sham acupuncture in knee osteoarthritis:a randomized controlled trial(强化针刺对比假针治疗膝骨关节炎随机对照试验)一文,对每周3次针刺治疗膝骨关节炎有效性、安全性给予了肯定。海内外专家对这一试验报告的研究设计、针刺方案、结果解读等方面进行了深入讨论,强调了预试验实施、针刺剂量、合理设置对照组及判断针刺疗效的重要性,并指出针刺治疗膝骨关节炎的潜在机制仍需进一步研究,如何在确保针刺疗效的前提下根据国外临床实际推广针刺治疗膝骨关节炎是值得探索的问题。展开更多
This study examined the application of the Rumsfeld Matrix to acupuncture clinical trials,particularly those published in leading medical journals such as The Journal of the American Medical Association(JAMA),British ...This study examined the application of the Rumsfeld Matrix to acupuncture clinical trials,particularly those published in leading medical journals such as The Journal of the American Medical Association(JAMA),British Medical Journal(BMJ),The Lancet,and The New Eng-land Journal of Medicine(NEJM).The integration of randomized clinical trials(RCTs)has in-troduced a level of academic rigor to acupuncture research,challenging the classical deter-ministic model and revealing a complex landscape of known knowns,known unknowns,un-known knowns,and unknown unknowns.While RCTs have validated acupuncture’s efficacy in certain conditions,they have also highlighted considerable challenges,including the limi-tations of control group designs and the potential influence of placebo effects.The recurring issue of no significant differences between real and sham acupuncture in many studies un-derscores the need for refined control strategies and a more nuanced understanding of acupuncture’s mechanisms.This investigation calls for continued rigorous research to fully explore acupuncture’s therapeutic potential and its integration into evidence-based medicine,ultimately contributing to improved patient care and broader acceptance within the medical community.展开更多
文摘北京中医药大学刘存志教授团队于2021年11月10日在Arthritis&Rheumatology杂志发表Efficacy of intensive acupuncture versus sham acupuncture in knee osteoarthritis:a randomized controlled trial(强化针刺对比假针治疗膝骨关节炎随机对照试验)一文,对每周3次针刺治疗膝骨关节炎有效性、安全性给予了肯定。海内外专家对这一试验报告的研究设计、针刺方案、结果解读等方面进行了深入讨论,强调了预试验实施、针刺剂量、合理设置对照组及判断针刺疗效的重要性,并指出针刺治疗膝骨关节炎的潜在机制仍需进一步研究,如何在确保针刺疗效的前提下根据国外临床实际推广针刺治疗膝骨关节炎是值得探索的问题。
文摘This study examined the application of the Rumsfeld Matrix to acupuncture clinical trials,particularly those published in leading medical journals such as The Journal of the American Medical Association(JAMA),British Medical Journal(BMJ),The Lancet,and The New Eng-land Journal of Medicine(NEJM).The integration of randomized clinical trials(RCTs)has in-troduced a level of academic rigor to acupuncture research,challenging the classical deter-ministic model and revealing a complex landscape of known knowns,known unknowns,un-known knowns,and unknown unknowns.While RCTs have validated acupuncture’s efficacy in certain conditions,they have also highlighted considerable challenges,including the limi-tations of control group designs and the potential influence of placebo effects.The recurring issue of no significant differences between real and sham acupuncture in many studies un-derscores the need for refined control strategies and a more nuanced understanding of acupuncture’s mechanisms.This investigation calls for continued rigorous research to fully explore acupuncture’s therapeutic potential and its integration into evidence-based medicine,ultimately contributing to improved patient care and broader acceptance within the medical community.
