Objective：To assist decision-makers interpret and choose among conflicting meta-analyses,as well as to offer treatment recommendations based on current best evidence by performing a systematic review of overlapping m...Objective：To assist decision-makers interpret and choose among conflicting meta-analyses,as well as to offer treatment recommendations based on current best evidence by performing a systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses regarding Shenyi Capsule（参一胶囊,SC） plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy of non-small cell lung cancer（NSCLC）.Methods：A literature search was conducted to select systematic reviews comparing SC plus chemotherapy with chemotherapy for NSCLC.Meta-analyses only composed of randomized controlled trials（RCTs） met the inclusion criteria.Two authors individually estimated the quality of meta-analysis and extracted data.The Jadad decision algorithm was applied to guarantee which meta-analysis provided the best original evidence.Results：A total of 5 meta-analyses were included.All the studies composed of RCTs or quasi-RCTs and were regarded as level-Ⅱ evidence.The scores of the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews ranged from 3 to 6（median 4）.A high-quality meta-analysis with more RCTs was chosen,which suggested that SC plus chemotherapy could increase incidence of short-term efficacy,improve the quality of life and survival rate in comparison to chemotherapy.However,there was no statistically significant difference between SC plus chemotherapy and chemotherapy regarding chemotherapy-induced side effect,such as liver and kidney function obstacle,leukopenia,hemoglobin decrement and gastrointestinal adverse reaction.Conclusions：Based on the best available evidence,treatment effect of SC plus chemotherapy was better than chemotherapy and did not increase side effects.Therefore,SC plus chemotherapy may be superior to chemotherapy for treating NSCLC.However,due to some limitations,SC plus chemotherapy should be cautiously considered,and further high-quality meta-analyses are needed.展开更多
Objective：To assess the efficacy of Chinese medicine（CM） on patients with pancreatic cancer（PC） in a retrospective population-based study.Methods：Between January 1,2013,and August 30,2016,according to whether re...Objective：To assess the efficacy of Chinese medicine（CM） on patients with pancreatic cancer（PC） in a retrospective population-based study.Methods：Between January 1,2013,and August 30,2016,according to whether received Western medicine treatment,the patients were included into either integrative medicine（IM） group or CM group.All enrolled patients were orally administrated with Gexia Zhuyu Decoction（膈下逐瘀汤） or Liujun Ermu Decoction（六君二母汤） by syndrome differentiation,twice a day,last for at least 2 months.The primary end point was overall survival（OS）.Results：A total of 174 patients with PC were enrolled in this study.In stage Ⅰ/Ⅱ,the median OS was 20.5 months in the IM group [95% confidence interval（CI）,12.499 to 28.501] and 11.17 months in the CM group（95% CI,5.160 to 17.180,P=0.015）.The 1-and 2-year survival rates for the two groups were 47.0%,40.0% and 21.0%,21.0%,respectively.In stage Ⅲ/Ⅳ,median OS was 13.53 months（95% CI,8.665 to 18.395） in the IM group versus 6.4 months（95% CI,0.00 to 15.682） in the CM group,respectively（P=0.32）.The 1-and 2-year survival rate for the IM and CM groups were 27.0%,7.0% and 20.0%,2.0%,respectively.Conclusions：Intervention of CM contributes to the different survival benefits for PC in different stages.Multimodality treatment might be a promising strategy for PC patients in early stage.While,in advanced stage,CM might be an alternative candidate for PC patients.展开更多
文摘Objective：To assist decision-makers interpret and choose among conflicting meta-analyses,as well as to offer treatment recommendations based on current best evidence by performing a systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses regarding Shenyi Capsule（参一胶囊,SC） plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy of non-small cell lung cancer（NSCLC）.Methods：A literature search was conducted to select systematic reviews comparing SC plus chemotherapy with chemotherapy for NSCLC.Meta-analyses only composed of randomized controlled trials（RCTs） met the inclusion criteria.Two authors individually estimated the quality of meta-analysis and extracted data.The Jadad decision algorithm was applied to guarantee which meta-analysis provided the best original evidence.Results：A total of 5 meta-analyses were included.All the studies composed of RCTs or quasi-RCTs and were regarded as level-Ⅱ evidence.The scores of the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews ranged from 3 to 6（median 4）.A high-quality meta-analysis with more RCTs was chosen,which suggested that SC plus chemotherapy could increase incidence of short-term efficacy,improve the quality of life and survival rate in comparison to chemotherapy.However,there was no statistically significant difference between SC plus chemotherapy and chemotherapy regarding chemotherapy-induced side effect,such as liver and kidney function obstacle,leukopenia,hemoglobin decrement and gastrointestinal adverse reaction.Conclusions：Based on the best available evidence,treatment effect of SC plus chemotherapy was better than chemotherapy and did not increase side effects.Therefore,SC plus chemotherapy may be superior to chemotherapy for treating NSCLC.However,due to some limitations,SC plus chemotherapy should be cautiously considered,and further high-quality meta-analyses are needed.
基金Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(No.81673797)
文摘Objective：To assess the efficacy of Chinese medicine（CM） on patients with pancreatic cancer（PC） in a retrospective population-based study.Methods：Between January 1,2013,and August 30,2016,according to whether received Western medicine treatment,the patients were included into either integrative medicine（IM） group or CM group.All enrolled patients were orally administrated with Gexia Zhuyu Decoction（膈下逐瘀汤） or Liujun Ermu Decoction（六君二母汤） by syndrome differentiation,twice a day,last for at least 2 months.The primary end point was overall survival（OS）.Results：A total of 174 patients with PC were enrolled in this study.In stage Ⅰ/Ⅱ,the median OS was 20.5 months in the IM group [95% confidence interval（CI）,12.499 to 28.501] and 11.17 months in the CM group（95% CI,5.160 to 17.180,P=0.015）.The 1-and 2-year survival rates for the two groups were 47.0%,40.0% and 21.0%,21.0%,respectively.In stage Ⅲ/Ⅳ,median OS was 13.53 months（95% CI,8.665 to 18.395） in the IM group versus 6.4 months（95% CI,0.00 to 15.682） in the CM group,respectively（P=0.32）.The 1-and 2-year survival rate for the IM and CM groups were 27.0%,7.0% and 20.0%,2.0%,respectively.Conclusions：Intervention of CM contributes to the different survival benefits for PC in different stages.Multimodality treatment might be a promising strategy for PC patients in early stage.While,in advanced stage,CM might be an alternative candidate for PC patients.
