3D printing with concrete is a promising new method for rapid,low cost construction.The flexural strengths for reinforced/unreinforced and 3D printed/cast concrete Warren trusses were tabulated and the failure mechani...3D printing with concrete is a promising new method for rapid,low cost construction.The flexural strengths for reinforced/unreinforced and 3D printed/cast concrete Warren trusses were tabulated and the failure mechanisms were reported.The types of reinforcement used were rebar(basalt and steel),and mesh(basalt and aramid).The effect of loading geometry and loading speed was measured for basalt mesh and aramid mesh composite,respectively.Due to the expected variation in flexure between samples,it cannot be said whether small differences for various tests are significant.Variation stems from a microscopically uneven surface and random inhomogeneities in the bulk of the tested material which act as a microcrack catalyst and propagator.Since the tested beams are short specimens the numerical findings of other studies will vary based on the intended design.This paper is intended to assess the performance of various reinforcements in a qualitative sense by comparing basalt reinforcement with other reinforcements.It was found that cast beams tolerated deflection better but had a similar flexure strength compared as the printed beams.The steel and basalt rebar reinforced beams had the highest flexure strengths where the traditional steel rebar reinforcement outperformed the basalt in flexure by 36%and the basalt outperformed the steel in deflection by 40%.The basalt mesh outperformed the cast and printed unreinforced bars by a small margin but had only 25%of steel rebars’deflection at maximum flexure strength.The aramid mesh tolerated the biggest deflection out of any sample at 2.26 cm.展开更多
文摘3D printing with concrete is a promising new method for rapid,low cost construction.The flexural strengths for reinforced/unreinforced and 3D printed/cast concrete Warren trusses were tabulated and the failure mechanisms were reported.The types of reinforcement used were rebar(basalt and steel),and mesh(basalt and aramid).The effect of loading geometry and loading speed was measured for basalt mesh and aramid mesh composite,respectively.Due to the expected variation in flexure between samples,it cannot be said whether small differences for various tests are significant.Variation stems from a microscopically uneven surface and random inhomogeneities in the bulk of the tested material which act as a microcrack catalyst and propagator.Since the tested beams are short specimens the numerical findings of other studies will vary based on the intended design.This paper is intended to assess the performance of various reinforcements in a qualitative sense by comparing basalt reinforcement with other reinforcements.It was found that cast beams tolerated deflection better but had a similar flexure strength compared as the printed beams.The steel and basalt rebar reinforced beams had the highest flexure strengths where the traditional steel rebar reinforcement outperformed the basalt in flexure by 36%and the basalt outperformed the steel in deflection by 40%.The basalt mesh outperformed the cast and printed unreinforced bars by a small margin but had only 25%of steel rebars’deflection at maximum flexure strength.The aramid mesh tolerated the biggest deflection out of any sample at 2.26 cm.
