Densiron 68 heavy silicone oil in the management of inferior retinal detachment recurrence: analysis on functional and anatomical outcomes and complications

AIM: To assess the efficacy and safety of a heavy silicone oil(Densiron 68) in the management of inferior retinal detachment recurrence.METHODS: A retrospective non-comparative consecutive case series study. Forty-nine cases of complex inferior retinal detachment were treated using Densiron 68 heavy silicone oil(HSO) as the endotamponade. Our main purpose was anatomic reattachment following Densiron 68 removal. Functional outcomes, rate of recurrences, the presence of inflammatory complications and intraocular pressure alterations were evaluated. RESULTS: Forty-nine patients affected by complex retinal re-detachment were recruited. The mean follow-up was 7.6(±1.5) mo. The mean best corrected visual acuity after Densiron 68 removal was 0.95 log MAR, standard error(SE: 0.068). Retinal reattachment was 61.2% after first surgery and 81.6% after second surgery. Nineteen cases(38.8%) had recurrences when intraocular heavy silicon oil was in situ, 26.3%(5 cases) of which involved the inferior retina. CONCLUSION: Densiron 68 efficiently fills the inferior retinal periphery and might lower the risk of inferior proliferative vitreoretinopathy development, in particular after a standard silicon oil tamponade that reduces the proliferative process in the upper quadrants of the retina.

Ultrathin Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty versus Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty:a fellow-eye comparison

Background:To compare the visual outcome and patients’satisfaction after ultrathin Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty(UT-DSAEK)and Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty(DMEK)performed on fellow eyes of the same patients.Methods:In this retrospective study,the records of 18 pseudophakic patients affected by Fuchs endothelial dystrophy who underwent DMEK in one eye and UT-DSAEK in the fellow eye were reviewed.Best corrected visual acuity(BCVA),corneal pachymetry,keratometry,corneal aberrations,photopic and mesopic contrast sensitivity,and endothelial cell counts measured 12 months after surgery in either eye were analyzed and compared.The results of a satisfaction questionnaire were also reviewed.Results:Twelve months after surgery,BCVA was not significantly different in UT-DSAEK and DMEK eyes(0.10±0.04 and 0.07±0.07 logMAR,respectively);at both 4-and 6 mm optical zones total and posterior corneal higher order aberrations(HOAs),posterior astigmatism and total coma were significantly lower after DMEK;BCVA in both groups was significantly correlated mainly with anterior corneal aberrations;contrast sensitivity was higher after DMEK especially in mesopic conditions and at medium spatial frequencies;the endothelial cell density was similar,although slightly higher in the UT-DSAEK group(p=0.10).The satisfaction questionnaire showed that although patients were highly satisfied from both procedures,more than half of them preferred DMEK and reported a more comfortable and quicker postoperative recovery.Conclusions:DMEK and UT-DSAEK showed no evidence of difference in terms of postoperative BCVA,although DMEK had a better performance in terms of contrast sensitivity,posterior corneal aberrations and overall patient satisfaction.