Objective It is still controversial about when,where and how the East Paleotethys Ocean closed due to the lack of reliable paleomagnetic data from the blocks or terranes located in both sides of the suture,which prohi...Objective It is still controversial about when,where and how the East Paleotethys Ocean closed due to the lack of reliable paleomagnetic data from the blocks or terranes located in both sides of the suture,which prohibits our better understanding of a series of key scientific issues such as how major blocks of East Asia collided together。展开更多
In order to investigate the tectonic setting of 1.77-1.78Ga dyke swarms emplaced into the central North China Craton(NCC),we carried out a paleomagnetic and magnetic fabric study on the well geochronologically
Identifying when, where, and how India and Asia collided is a prerequisite to better understand the evolution of the Himalayan-Tibetan Plateau. Whereas with essentially the same published paleomagnetic data, a large r...Identifying when, where, and how India and Asia collided is a prerequisite to better understand the evolution of the Himalayan-Tibetan Plateau. Whereas with essentially the same published paleomagnetic data, a large range of different India-Asia collision models have been proposed in the literature. Based upon the premise of a northwards-moving Indian plate during the Cretaceous times, we analyze the significant variations in relative paleolatitude produced by a nearly 90° counterclockwise(CCW)rotation of the plate itself during the Cretaceous. Interestingly, recent studies proposed a dual-collision process with a Greater India basin or post-Neo-Tethyan ocean for the India-Asia collision, mainly in the light of divergent Cretaceous paleolatitude differences of the Tethyan Himalaya between the observed values and expected ones computed from the apparent polar wander path of the Indian plate. However, we find that these varied paleolatitude differences are mainly resulted from a nearly 90° CCW rotation of a rigid/quasi-rigid Greater Indian plate during the Cretaceous. On the other hand, when the Indian craton and Tethyan Himalaya moved as two individual blocks rather than a united rigid/quasi-rigid Greater Indian plate before the India-Asia collision, current available Cretaceous paleomagnetic data permit only multiple paleogeographic solutions for the tectonic relationship between the Indian plate and the Tethyan Himalayan terrane. We therefore argue that the tectonic relationship between the Indian plate and the Tethyan Himalayan terrane cannot be uniquely constrained by current paleomagnetic data in the absence of sufficient geological evidence, and the so-called Greater India basin model is just one of the ideal scenarios.展开更多
There are some quite different disputes about chronostratigraphic division of the Cretaceous in the Kuqa Depression, northern margin of the Tarim Basin. We then carried on a magnetostratigraphic study on Cretaceous su...There are some quite different disputes about chronostratigraphic division of the Cretaceous in the Kuqa Depression, northern margin of the Tarim Basin. We then carried on a magnetostratigraphic study on Cretaceous succession in the Kuqa River and Kezilenuer Channel profiles. Detailed paleomag- netic analyses on 446 specimens from 265 sites permit a construction of a preliminary magnetic polar- ity sequence for the Cretaceous strata. Together with paleobiologic constraints from calcareous nannofos- sils, magnetostratigraphic results show that the Bash- enjiqike Formation was probably deposited during the late Campanian to Maastrichtian stages of the Late Cretaceous, ranging from about 79.1 to 65.6 Ma. On the other hand, magnetozones identified from the Yageliemu, Shushanhe, and Baxigai formations may principally correlate with chrons M18r to M3 of the Geomagnetic Polarity Time Scale (GPTS). This cor- relation suggests that these three formations were very likely to be formed during the early-middle stage of the Early Cretaceous between the Berriasian to the early Berremian stages (141.9―124.1Ma). Therefore it is possible that the Bashenjiqike Formation con- tacts the underlying strata with an unconformity and there is a giant sedimentary hiatus during the period of the late Barremian to early Maastrichtian stages in the Kuqa Depression.展开更多
基金financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grants No. 41190071 and 41702229)
文摘Objective It is still controversial about when,where and how the East Paleotethys Ocean closed due to the lack of reliable paleomagnetic data from the blocks or terranes located in both sides of the suture,which prohibits our better understanding of a series of key scientific issues such as how major blocks of East Asia collided together。
文摘In order to investigate the tectonic setting of 1.77-1.78Ga dyke swarms emplaced into the central North China Craton(NCC),we carried out a paleomagnetic and magnetic fabric study on the well geochronologically
基金financially supported by the Strategic Priority Research Program (B type) of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant No. XDB03010404)
文摘Identifying when, where, and how India and Asia collided is a prerequisite to better understand the evolution of the Himalayan-Tibetan Plateau. Whereas with essentially the same published paleomagnetic data, a large range of different India-Asia collision models have been proposed in the literature. Based upon the premise of a northwards-moving Indian plate during the Cretaceous times, we analyze the significant variations in relative paleolatitude produced by a nearly 90° counterclockwise(CCW)rotation of the plate itself during the Cretaceous. Interestingly, recent studies proposed a dual-collision process with a Greater India basin or post-Neo-Tethyan ocean for the India-Asia collision, mainly in the light of divergent Cretaceous paleolatitude differences of the Tethyan Himalaya between the observed values and expected ones computed from the apparent polar wander path of the Indian plate. However, we find that these varied paleolatitude differences are mainly resulted from a nearly 90° CCW rotation of a rigid/quasi-rigid Greater Indian plate during the Cretaceous. On the other hand, when the Indian craton and Tethyan Himalaya moved as two individual blocks rather than a united rigid/quasi-rigid Greater Indian plate before the India-Asia collision, current available Cretaceous paleomagnetic data permit only multiple paleogeographic solutions for the tectonic relationship between the Indian plate and the Tethyan Himalayan terrane. We therefore argue that the tectonic relationship between the Indian plate and the Tethyan Himalayan terrane cannot be uniquely constrained by current paleomagnetic data in the absence of sufficient geological evidence, and the so-called Greater India basin model is just one of the ideal scenarios.
基金supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(Grant No.40472069)the Ministry of Science and Technology of China(Grant Nos.2002CCA05100 and 1999043303).
文摘There are some quite different disputes about chronostratigraphic division of the Cretaceous in the Kuqa Depression, northern margin of the Tarim Basin. We then carried on a magnetostratigraphic study on Cretaceous succession in the Kuqa River and Kezilenuer Channel profiles. Detailed paleomag- netic analyses on 446 specimens from 265 sites permit a construction of a preliminary magnetic polar- ity sequence for the Cretaceous strata. Together with paleobiologic constraints from calcareous nannofos- sils, magnetostratigraphic results show that the Bash- enjiqike Formation was probably deposited during the late Campanian to Maastrichtian stages of the Late Cretaceous, ranging from about 79.1 to 65.6 Ma. On the other hand, magnetozones identified from the Yageliemu, Shushanhe, and Baxigai formations may principally correlate with chrons M18r to M3 of the Geomagnetic Polarity Time Scale (GPTS). This cor- relation suggests that these three formations were very likely to be formed during the early-middle stage of the Early Cretaceous between the Berriasian to the early Berremian stages (141.9―124.1Ma). Therefore it is possible that the Bashenjiqike Formation con- tacts the underlying strata with an unconformity and there is a giant sedimentary hiatus during the period of the late Barremian to early Maastrichtian stages in the Kuqa Depression.
