Value of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging combined with tumor markers in the diagnosis of ovarian tumors

BACKGROUND Compare the diagnostic performance of ultrasound(US),magnetic resonance imaging(MRI),and serum tumor markers alone or in combination for detecting ovarian tumors.AIM To investigate the diagnostic value of US,MRI combined with tumor markers in ovarian tumors.METHODS The data of 110 patients with ovarian tumors,confirmed by surgery and pathology,were collected in our hospital from February 2018 to May 2023.The dataset included 60 cases of benign tumors and 50 cases of malignant tumors.Prior to surgery,all patients underwent preoperative US and MRI examinations,as well as serum tumor marker tests[carbohydrate antigen 125(CA125),human epididymis protein 4(HE4)].The aim of the study was to compare the diagnostic performance of these three methods individually and in combination for ovarian tumors.RESULTS This study found statistically significant differences in the ultrasonic imaging characteristics between benign and malignant tumors.These differences include echo characteristics,presence or absence of a capsule,blood flow resistance index,clear tumor shape,and blood flow signal display rate(P<0.05).The apparent diffusion coefficient values of the solid and cystic parts in benign tumors were found to be higher compared to malignant tumors(P<0.05).Additionally,the time-intensity curve image features of benign and malignant tumors showed significant statistical differences(P<0.05).The levels of serum CA125 and HE4 in benign tumors were lower than those in malignant tumors(P<0.05).The combined use of US,MRI,and tumor markers in the diagnosis of ovarian tumors demonstrates higher accuracy,sensitivity,and specificity compared to using each method individually(P<0.05).CONCLUSION US,MRI,and tumor markers each have their own advantages and disadvantages when it comes to diagnosing ovarian tumors.However,by combining these three methods,we can significantly enhance the accuracy of ovarian tumor diagnosis,enabling early detection and identification of the tumor’s nature,and providing valuable guidance for clinical treatment.

Psychometric hepatic encephalopathy score for diagnosis of minimal hepatic encephalopathy in China

AIM:To construct normal values for the tests of the psychometric hepatic encephalopathy score(PHES)and to evaluate its usefulness in the diagnosis of minimal hepatic encephalopathy(MHE)among Chinese individuals with cirrhosis.METHODS:The five tests of PHES,number connection test-A(NCT-A),number connection test-B,serial dotting test,line tracing test and digit symbol test(DST),were administered to all enrolled subjects in a quiet room with sufficient light.Cirrhotic subjects with overt HE were excluded by the West-Haven criteria and a detailed neurological examination.Based on the nomograms of healthy volunteers,the patients were classified as having MHE when their PHES was less than-4.RESULTS:In total,146 healthy volunteers completed all the PHES tests.Age and education years were confirmed to be predictors of all five tests.In total,53patients with liver cirrhosis completed the PHES.Of the patients with liver cirrhosis,24(45.3%),22(41.5%)and 7(13.2%)had Child-Pugh grades A,B and C,respectively.MHE was diagnosed in 26 patients(49.1%).Compared with compensated cirrhotic patients(Child A),decompensated cirrhotic patients(Child B and C)had a higher proportion of MHE(65.5%vs 29.2%).No differences in age and education years were found between the MHE and non-MHE groups.NCT-A and DST were able to diagnose MHE with a sensitivity of 76.9%and a specificity of 96.3%(AUC=0.866,K=0.735).CONCLUSION:The proportion of MHE is associated with liver function.NCT-A and DST are simple tools that can be used for the diagnosis of MHE in China.