Shenmai injection combined with Western medicine in the treatment of acute pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the classic ancient prescription Shenmai injection(the classic ancient presciption)combined with Western medicine in the treatment of acute pancreatitis.Method:PubMed,the Cochrane Library,EMBASE,the Web of Science,China National Knowledge Infrastructure,Wanfang database,VIP Database and Chinese BioMedicine Literature Database were searched from database establishment to January 2021.After 2 researchers independently screened the literature,extracted data and evaluated the bias risk included in the study.A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of the classic ancient prescription Shenmai injection combined with Western medicine in the treatment of acute pancreatitis was conducted with the Revman 5.0 software.Result:A total of 19 randomized controlled trials were included,including 1,507 patients.The results of meta-analysis showed that the test group had advantage over the control group in total effective rate(RR=1.23,95%CI(1.17,1.34),P<0.00001),serum amylase level(stand mean difference=−2.92,95%CI(−3.75,−2.09),P<0.00001),C-reactive protein level and IL-6 level with statistically significant.Conclusion:The current evidence shows that the classic ancient prescription Shenmai injection combined with Western medicine can achieve better curative effect in the treatment of acute pancreatitis than using Western medicine alone.It has more advantages in terms of the total effective rate,reducing the level of serum amylase level and inflammatory cytokines.

Efficacy and prognosis of mastoscopic axillary lymph node dissection for breast cancer:a systematic evaluation and meta-analysis

Objective:To systematically evaluate the efficacy and prognosis of breast lumpectomy axillary lymphatic dissection for the treatment of breast cancer.Methods:We use computer to search PubMed,The Cochrane Library,EMBASE,Web of Science,China Knowledge Network,Wanfang database,VIP database and CBM for randomized controlled trials(RCTs)of breast lumpectomy in axillary lymphatic dissection for breast cancer.The search time frame was from the database establishment to July 2021.Meta-analysis was performed using Revman 5.4.1 software after 2 investigators independently screened the literature,extracted information,and evaluated the risk of bias of the included studies.Results:A total of 20 RCTs including 2672 patients were included.Mastoscopic axillary lymph node dissection(MALND)was used in the trial group and conventional axillary lymph node dissection(CALND)was used in the control group.The results showed that the trial group was more effective in controlling bleeding volume[MD=-54.72,95%CI(-79.73,-29.71),P<0.00001],postoperative drainage[MD=-98.99,95%CI(-128.83,-69.15),P<0.00001],length of hospital stay[MD=-2.75,95%CI(-4.67,-0.83),P=0.005],and incidence rate of adverse reaction[RR=0.30,95%CI(0.19,0.45),P<0.00001]were superior to the control group,and the differences were statistically significant.Conclusions:Current evidence suggests that MALND can achieve better outcomes compared with CALND.It is more advantageous in controlling the bleeding volume,postoperative drainage,length of hospital stays,and incidence rate of adverse events.