BACKGROUND The current coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19)pandemic has affected routine endoscopy service across the gastroenterology community.This led to the suspension of service provision for elective cases.AIM To ...BACKGROUND The current coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19)pandemic has affected routine endoscopy service across the gastroenterology community.This led to the suspension of service provision for elective cases.AIM To assess the potential barriers for resuming the endoscopy service in Egypt.METHODS A national online survey,four domains,was disseminated over a period of 4 wk in August 2020.The primary outcome of the survey was to determine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the endoscopy service and barriers to the full resumption of a disabled center(s).RESULTS A hundred and thirteen Egyptian endoscopy centers participated in the survey.The waiting list was increased by≥50% in 44.9% of areas with clusters of COVID-19 cases(n=49)and in 35.5% of areas with sporadic cases(n=62).Thirty nine(34.8%)centers suffered from staff shortage,which was considered a barrier against service resumption by 86.4% of centers in per-protocol analysis.In multivariate analysis,the burden of cases in the unit locality,staff shortage/recovery and the availability of separate designated rooms for COVID-19 cases could markedly affect the resumption of endoscopy practice(P=0.029,<0.001 and 0.02,respectively)and Odd’s ratio(0.15,1.8 and 0.16,respectively).CONCLUSION The COVID-19 pandemic has led to restrictions in endoscopic volumes.The staff shortage/recovery and the availability of COVID-19 designed rooms are the most important barriers against recovery.Increasing working hours and dividing endoscopy staff into teams may help to overcome the current situation.展开更多
Background: Delayed pregnancy in women and marked increase in the numbers of older women who fail to respond to ovarian stimulation had been a significant issue. This study aims to assess the value of basal serum test...Background: Delayed pregnancy in women and marked increase in the numbers of older women who fail to respond to ovarian stimulation had been a significant issue. This study aims to assess the value of basal serum testosterone level as a predictor of ovarian response for induction of ovulation in women with unexplained infertility undergoing IVF (in vitro fertilization) cycle. Patients and Methods: A prospective study was conducted in Ain Shams University Maternity hospital Infertility Center during a period of time from October 2016 to June 2017. This study recruited 89 women. On day 2 or 3 of a spontaneous menstrual cycle of the included women within 3 months before fresh IVF cycle, basal hormonal (FSH, LH, estradiol, total testosterone) concentrations, AFC (antral follicle count) were performed. Using the Long-protocol for induction of ovulation, serial monitoring of ovarian response was assessed by transvaginal ultrasound. When the expected ovarian response was reached (at least three oocytes ≥ 17 mm), we gave trigger dose of HCG. Ultrasound guided oocyte aspiration was performed 34 - 36 hours later. Two to three days after oocyte aspiration, we transferred the embryos according to the patient’s age and the condition of embryos available. Biochemical pregnancy was considered if serum B-hCG test was positive at day 14 from embryo transfer, where all the data were correlated with serum testosterone level and ovarian response as 1 ry outcome. Results: There were significant positive correlations between testosterone and LH, Prolactin, AFC, Number of oocytes & Number of Embryos (0.014, 0.032, 0.023, 0.004, 0.033, p 0.001 respectively). Poor responders versus good responders as regards testosterone level (0.81 ± 0.47 versus 1.08 ± 0.45) Fertilized & pregnant cases had significantly higher testosterone than non-fertilized & non pregnant had (1.20 ± 0.45, 0.92 ± 0.47 p value 0.035, 0.021 respectively). Yet, testosterone had significant low diagnostic performance in prediction of poor response and pregnancy (AUC 0.654, 0.676 respectively), (p value 0.015, 0.022 respectively). Conclusion: Basal T levels are helpful for predicting ovarian response, hence the dosage of gonadotropins used in induction. But it can’t be used as single marker for prediction of ovarian response.展开更多
文摘BACKGROUND The current coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19)pandemic has affected routine endoscopy service across the gastroenterology community.This led to the suspension of service provision for elective cases.AIM To assess the potential barriers for resuming the endoscopy service in Egypt.METHODS A national online survey,four domains,was disseminated over a period of 4 wk in August 2020.The primary outcome of the survey was to determine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the endoscopy service and barriers to the full resumption of a disabled center(s).RESULTS A hundred and thirteen Egyptian endoscopy centers participated in the survey.The waiting list was increased by≥50% in 44.9% of areas with clusters of COVID-19 cases(n=49)and in 35.5% of areas with sporadic cases(n=62).Thirty nine(34.8%)centers suffered from staff shortage,which was considered a barrier against service resumption by 86.4% of centers in per-protocol analysis.In multivariate analysis,the burden of cases in the unit locality,staff shortage/recovery and the availability of separate designated rooms for COVID-19 cases could markedly affect the resumption of endoscopy practice(P=0.029,<0.001 and 0.02,respectively)and Odd’s ratio(0.15,1.8 and 0.16,respectively).CONCLUSION The COVID-19 pandemic has led to restrictions in endoscopic volumes.The staff shortage/recovery and the availability of COVID-19 designed rooms are the most important barriers against recovery.Increasing working hours and dividing endoscopy staff into teams may help to overcome the current situation.
文摘Background: Delayed pregnancy in women and marked increase in the numbers of older women who fail to respond to ovarian stimulation had been a significant issue. This study aims to assess the value of basal serum testosterone level as a predictor of ovarian response for induction of ovulation in women with unexplained infertility undergoing IVF (in vitro fertilization) cycle. Patients and Methods: A prospective study was conducted in Ain Shams University Maternity hospital Infertility Center during a period of time from October 2016 to June 2017. This study recruited 89 women. On day 2 or 3 of a spontaneous menstrual cycle of the included women within 3 months before fresh IVF cycle, basal hormonal (FSH, LH, estradiol, total testosterone) concentrations, AFC (antral follicle count) were performed. Using the Long-protocol for induction of ovulation, serial monitoring of ovarian response was assessed by transvaginal ultrasound. When the expected ovarian response was reached (at least three oocytes ≥ 17 mm), we gave trigger dose of HCG. Ultrasound guided oocyte aspiration was performed 34 - 36 hours later. Two to three days after oocyte aspiration, we transferred the embryos according to the patient’s age and the condition of embryos available. Biochemical pregnancy was considered if serum B-hCG test was positive at day 14 from embryo transfer, where all the data were correlated with serum testosterone level and ovarian response as 1 ry outcome. Results: There were significant positive correlations between testosterone and LH, Prolactin, AFC, Number of oocytes & Number of Embryos (0.014, 0.032, 0.023, 0.004, 0.033, p 0.001 respectively). Poor responders versus good responders as regards testosterone level (0.81 ± 0.47 versus 1.08 ± 0.45) Fertilized & pregnant cases had significantly higher testosterone than non-fertilized & non pregnant had (1.20 ± 0.45, 0.92 ± 0.47 p value 0.035, 0.021 respectively). Yet, testosterone had significant low diagnostic performance in prediction of poor response and pregnancy (AUC 0.654, 0.676 respectively), (p value 0.015, 0.022 respectively). Conclusion: Basal T levels are helpful for predicting ovarian response, hence the dosage of gonadotropins used in induction. But it can’t be used as single marker for prediction of ovarian response.
