Based on a typical gas composition from a methanol-to-propylene (MTP) reactor, and guided by a requirement to recover both propylene and ethylene, three separation strategies are studied and simulated by using PROI1 p...Based on a typical gas composition from a methanol-to-propylene (MTP) reactor, and guided by a requirement to recover both propylene and ethylene, three separation strategies are studied and simulated by using PROI1 package. These strategies are sequential separation, front-end dethanization, and front-end depropanization. The process does not involve an ethylene refrigeration system, using the separated stream as absorbent, and absorbing further the medium-pressure demethanization, and a proprietary technology by combining intercooling oil absorption and throttle expansio n. In fluences of different process streams as absorbent are studied on energy consumptions, propylene and ethylene recovery percentages, and other key-performance indicators of the separation strategies. Based on a commercial MTP plant with a methanol capacity of 1700 kt·a^-1, the simulated results show that the front-end dethanization using the C4 mixture as absorbent is the optimal separation strategy, in which the standard fuel oil consumption (a key-performance in dicator of energy con sumption) is 18.97 kt·h^-1, the total power consumption of two compressors is 22.4 MW, the propylene recovery percentage is 99.70%, and the ethylene recovery percentage is 99.70%. For a further improvement, the pre-dethanization and thermal coupling methods are applied. By using front-end pre-dethanization (partial cutting) with debutanizeroverhead, i.e. the C4 mixture, as absorbent, the power consumption of the compressors decreases to 19.9 MW, an 11% reduction compared with the clear-cutting method. The energy consumption for the dual compressors for crude gaseous product mixture and main product propylene refrigeration is 16.69 MW, 16.55% lower than that of the present MTP industrial plant with the same scale, and a total energy consumption of 20 MW for the triple compressors including product gas mixture compression, and ethylene and propylene refrigeration.展开更多
基金Supported by Sinopec Group company commissioned development project(contract number:412101)
文摘Based on a typical gas composition from a methanol-to-propylene (MTP) reactor, and guided by a requirement to recover both propylene and ethylene, three separation strategies are studied and simulated by using PROI1 package. These strategies are sequential separation, front-end dethanization, and front-end depropanization. The process does not involve an ethylene refrigeration system, using the separated stream as absorbent, and absorbing further the medium-pressure demethanization, and a proprietary technology by combining intercooling oil absorption and throttle expansio n. In fluences of different process streams as absorbent are studied on energy consumptions, propylene and ethylene recovery percentages, and other key-performance indicators of the separation strategies. Based on a commercial MTP plant with a methanol capacity of 1700 kt·a^-1, the simulated results show that the front-end dethanization using the C4 mixture as absorbent is the optimal separation strategy, in which the standard fuel oil consumption (a key-performance in dicator of energy con sumption) is 18.97 kt·h^-1, the total power consumption of two compressors is 22.4 MW, the propylene recovery percentage is 99.70%, and the ethylene recovery percentage is 99.70%. For a further improvement, the pre-dethanization and thermal coupling methods are applied. By using front-end pre-dethanization (partial cutting) with debutanizeroverhead, i.e. the C4 mixture, as absorbent, the power consumption of the compressors decreases to 19.9 MW, an 11% reduction compared with the clear-cutting method. The energy consumption for the dual compressors for crude gaseous product mixture and main product propylene refrigeration is 16.69 MW, 16.55% lower than that of the present MTP industrial plant with the same scale, and a total energy consumption of 20 MW for the triple compressors including product gas mixture compression, and ethylene and propylene refrigeration.
