Coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19) pandemic has caused significant changes in ophthalmic practice. The initial strategy of strict restriction of elective activities has been replaced with various guidelines to revital...Coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19) pandemic has caused significant changes in ophthalmic practice. The initial strategy of strict restriction of elective activities has been replaced with various guidelines to revitalize ophthalmic procedures considering the new safety concerns. In this manuscript, we reviewed recent recommendations for ophthalmic practice in different fields of ophthalmology during the COVID-19 pandemic.展开更多
AIM:To compare the visual results of non-topographyguided and topography-guided photorefractive keratectomy(PRK)applying sequential and simultaneous corneal crosslinking(CXL)treatment for keratoconus.METHODS:Intervent...AIM:To compare the visual results of non-topographyguided and topography-guided photorefractive keratectomy(PRK)applying sequential and simultaneous corneal crosslinking(CXL)treatment for keratoconus.METHODS:Interventional and comparative prospective study.Sixty-nine eyes(36 patients)suffering from keratoconus(stages 1 Amsler-Krumeich classification)were divided into four groups:sequential topography-guided photorefractive keratectomy with CXL,simultaneous topography-guided photorefractive keratectomy with CXL,simultaneous nontopography guided photorefractive keratectomy with CXL,and sequential non-topography guided photorefractive keratectomy with CXL.The main outcome measures were pre-and postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity(UDVA),best corrected distance visual acuity(CDVA),manifest refraction,contrast sensitivity,and keratometry.RESULTS:All analyzed visual,contrast sensitivity,and refractive parameters showed a significant improvement in the four groups(all P<0.05).A noticeable improvement was seen in keratometry in all the groups,and a remarkable difference was observed between topography-guided groups in comparison to non-topography-guided groups(P<0.05).Interestingly,the improvement in all parameters showed a degree of stability to the end of the follow-up.CONCLUSION:The treatment priorities in all four groups are safety,efficacy,and predictability in the correction of the sphero-cylindrical errors in mild and moderate keratoconus.No significant differences among groups in the recorded objective outcomes were found.展开更多
文摘Coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19) pandemic has caused significant changes in ophthalmic practice. The initial strategy of strict restriction of elective activities has been replaced with various guidelines to revitalize ophthalmic procedures considering the new safety concerns. In this manuscript, we reviewed recent recommendations for ophthalmic practice in different fields of ophthalmology during the COVID-19 pandemic.
文摘AIM:To compare the visual results of non-topographyguided and topography-guided photorefractive keratectomy(PRK)applying sequential and simultaneous corneal crosslinking(CXL)treatment for keratoconus.METHODS:Interventional and comparative prospective study.Sixty-nine eyes(36 patients)suffering from keratoconus(stages 1 Amsler-Krumeich classification)were divided into four groups:sequential topography-guided photorefractive keratectomy with CXL,simultaneous topography-guided photorefractive keratectomy with CXL,simultaneous nontopography guided photorefractive keratectomy with CXL,and sequential non-topography guided photorefractive keratectomy with CXL.The main outcome measures were pre-and postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity(UDVA),best corrected distance visual acuity(CDVA),manifest refraction,contrast sensitivity,and keratometry.RESULTS:All analyzed visual,contrast sensitivity,and refractive parameters showed a significant improvement in the four groups(all P<0.05).A noticeable improvement was seen in keratometry in all the groups,and a remarkable difference was observed between topography-guided groups in comparison to non-topography-guided groups(P<0.05).Interestingly,the improvement in all parameters showed a degree of stability to the end of the follow-up.CONCLUSION:The treatment priorities in all four groups are safety,efficacy,and predictability in the correction of the sphero-cylindrical errors in mild and moderate keratoconus.No significant differences among groups in the recorded objective outcomes were found.
