目的:比较玻璃体切割联合内界膜剥除术或内界膜覆盖术治疗高度近视黄斑裂孔视网膜脱离(MHRD)的疗效。方法:回顾性临床研究。选取2020-01/2021-06于我院行玻璃体切割联合内界膜剥除术或内界膜覆盖术治疗的高度近视MHRD患者38例38眼,根据...目的:比较玻璃体切割联合内界膜剥除术或内界膜覆盖术治疗高度近视黄斑裂孔视网膜脱离(MHRD)的疗效。方法:回顾性临床研究。选取2020-01/2021-06于我院行玻璃体切割联合内界膜剥除术或内界膜覆盖术治疗的高度近视MHRD患者38例38眼,根据手术方式分为对照组(行玻璃体切割联合内界膜剥除术)和观察组(行玻璃体切割联合内界膜覆盖术)。随访至术后3mo,比较两组患者手术时间、最佳矫正视力(BCVA)、黄斑裂孔闭合和视网膜复位情况。结果:两组患者手术时间无差异(30.71±4.55min vs 35.20±5.44min,P=0.384)。末次随访时,两组患者BCVA均较术前明显改善(均P<0.01),但两组患者BCVA(LogMAR)无差异(1.39±0.24 vs 1.46±0.27,P=0.700);观察组患者黄斑裂孔闭合率高于对照组(100%vs 71%,P=0.024),但两组患者视网膜再脱离率比较无差异(0 vs 10%,P=0.492)。结论:两种手术方式均可改善患者视力,但玻璃体切割联合内界膜覆盖术后黄斑裂孔闭合率更高。展开更多
BACKGROUND： Postoperative gastrointestinal dysfunction（PGD） is one of the most common complications following major surgeries under general anesthesia（GA）. Despite ongoing research and new drug treatments, abdomi...BACKGROUND： Postoperative gastrointestinal dysfunction（PGD） is one of the most common complications following major surgeries under general anesthesia（GA）. Despite ongoing research and new drug treatments, abdominal distension within 24 h postoperatively occurs in 8%–28% of all surgeries. We aim to analyze the effectiveness of preventing PGD by preoperatively stimulating Neiguan（PC6）, Zusanli（ST36） and Shangjuxu（ST37） bilaterally twice a day compared with sham-acupuncture treatment and standard treatment.METHODS AND DESIGN： This is a single-center, prospective practical randomized controlled trial. All groups will be given standard treatments. Patients undergoing vascular surgery under GA will be included from the Vascular Surgery Unit in West China Hospital of Sichuan University, China, and divided into three groups. The experimental group will receive routine treatments and acupuncture at PC6, ST36 and ST37 bilaterally with electrical stimulation twice a day for 20 min preoperatively. The sham-acupuncture group will receive pseudo-electroacupuncture at sham acupoints of PC6, ST36 and ST37, which are 1 cun away from the real acupoints. The routine-treatment group will not receive electroacupuncture. The outcomes include the incidence of abdominal distention, abdominal circumference, the degree of abdominal distension, the fi rst time of fl atus and defecation, and hospitalization duration. DISCUSSION： The results from this study will demonstrate whether preoperative electroacupuncture is an effective method for the prevention of PGD in patients undergoing vascular surgery under GA. This study may also provide a standardized acupuncture treatment for reduction of PGD. TRIAL REGISTRATION： This study is registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry： Chi CTR-TRC-13003649.展开更多
文摘目的:比较玻璃体切割联合内界膜剥除术或内界膜覆盖术治疗高度近视黄斑裂孔视网膜脱离(MHRD)的疗效。方法:回顾性临床研究。选取2020-01/2021-06于我院行玻璃体切割联合内界膜剥除术或内界膜覆盖术治疗的高度近视MHRD患者38例38眼,根据手术方式分为对照组(行玻璃体切割联合内界膜剥除术)和观察组(行玻璃体切割联合内界膜覆盖术)。随访至术后3mo,比较两组患者手术时间、最佳矫正视力(BCVA)、黄斑裂孔闭合和视网膜复位情况。结果:两组患者手术时间无差异(30.71±4.55min vs 35.20±5.44min,P=0.384)。末次随访时,两组患者BCVA均较术前明显改善(均P<0.01),但两组患者BCVA(LogMAR)无差异(1.39±0.24 vs 1.46±0.27,P=0.700);观察组患者黄斑裂孔闭合率高于对照组(100%vs 71%,P=0.024),但两组患者视网膜再脱离率比较无差异(0 vs 10%,P=0.492)。结论:两种手术方式均可改善患者视力,但玻璃体切割联合内界膜覆盖术后黄斑裂孔闭合率更高。
文摘BACKGROUND： Postoperative gastrointestinal dysfunction（PGD） is one of the most common complications following major surgeries under general anesthesia（GA）. Despite ongoing research and new drug treatments, abdominal distension within 24 h postoperatively occurs in 8%–28% of all surgeries. We aim to analyze the effectiveness of preventing PGD by preoperatively stimulating Neiguan（PC6）, Zusanli（ST36） and Shangjuxu（ST37） bilaterally twice a day compared with sham-acupuncture treatment and standard treatment.METHODS AND DESIGN： This is a single-center, prospective practical randomized controlled trial. All groups will be given standard treatments. Patients undergoing vascular surgery under GA will be included from the Vascular Surgery Unit in West China Hospital of Sichuan University, China, and divided into three groups. The experimental group will receive routine treatments and acupuncture at PC6, ST36 and ST37 bilaterally with electrical stimulation twice a day for 20 min preoperatively. The sham-acupuncture group will receive pseudo-electroacupuncture at sham acupoints of PC6, ST36 and ST37, which are 1 cun away from the real acupoints. The routine-treatment group will not receive electroacupuncture. The outcomes include the incidence of abdominal distention, abdominal circumference, the degree of abdominal distension, the fi rst time of fl atus and defecation, and hospitalization duration. DISCUSSION： The results from this study will demonstrate whether preoperative electroacupuncture is an effective method for the prevention of PGD in patients undergoing vascular surgery under GA. This study may also provide a standardized acupuncture treatment for reduction of PGD. TRIAL REGISTRATION： This study is registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry： Chi CTR-TRC-13003649.
