Genetic Effects on Sensorineural Hearing Loss and Evidence-based Treatment for Sensorineural Hearing Loss

In this article,the mechanism of inheritance behind inherited hearing loss and genetic susceptibilityin noise-induced hearing loss are reviewed.Conventional treatments for sensorineural hearing loss(SNHL),i.e.hearing aid and cochlear implant,are effective for some cases,but not without limitations.For example,they provide little benefit for patients of profound SNHL or neural hearing loss,especially when the hearing loss is in poor dynamic range and with low frequency resolution.We emphasize the most recent evidence-based treatment in this field,which includes gene therapy and allotransplantation of stem cells.Their promising results have shown that they might be options of treatment for profound SNHL and neural hearing loss.Although some treatments are still at the experimental stage,it is helpful to be aware of the novel therapies and endeavour to explore the feasibility of their clinical application.

Clinical observation of soft palate-pharyngoplasty in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome in children

BACKGROUND Childhood obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome(OSAHS)is a common clinical disease that can cause serious complications if not treated in time.The preferred treatment for OSAHS in children is surgery.AIM To observe the effects of soft palate-pharyngoplasty on postoperative outcome,pharyngeal formation,and possible complications.METHODS A total of 150 children with snoring,hernia,and mouth breathing were selected.A polysomnography test was performed to confirm the diagnosis of OSAHS.The children were randomly divided into experimental and control groups.The experimental group underwent adenoidectomy,tonsillectomy,and soft palatepharyngoplasty.The control group underwent adenoidectomy and tonsillectomy.The t-test and chi-square test were used to compare conditions such as postoperative fever,postoperative hemorrhage,and pharyngeal reflux.Postoperative efficacy and complications were interrogated and observed in the form of outpatient follow-up and telephone follow-up at 6 mo and 1 year after surgery.The curative effects were divided into two groups:Cure(snoring,snoring symptoms disappeared)and non-cure.RESULTS The effective rate of the experimental group was significantly higher than that of the control group,but the difference was not statistically significant(P>0.05).The incidence of postoperative bleeding was lower in the experimental group.There was no postoperative pharyngeal reflux in either group.In the experimental group,the incidence of hyperthermia(body temperature exceeded 38.5°C)was lower than that in the control group.The difference in postoperative swallowing pain scores between the experimental and control groups was significant.CONCLUSION Soft palate-pharyngoplasty can more effectively enlarge the anteroposterior diameter and transverse diameter of the isthmus faucium.Compared with surgery alone,it can better treat OSAHS in children,improve the curative effect,reduce the risk of perioperative bleeding,close the surgical cavity,reduce the risk of postoperative infection,reduce the proportion of postoperative fever,and accelerate healing.Although this process takes more time,it is simple,safe,and effective.

Confounding Effect in Clinical Research of Otolaryngology and Its Control

Confounding effect is a critical issue in clinical research of otolaryngology because it can distort the research's conclusion. In this review, we introduce the definition of confounding effect, the methods of verifying and controlling the effect. Confounding effect can be prevented by research's design, and adjusted by data analysis. Clinicians would be aware and cautious about confounding effect in their research. They would be able to set up a research's design in which appropriate methods have been applied to prevent this effect.They would know how to adjust confounding effect after data collection. It is important to remember that sometimes it is impossible to eliminate confounding effect completely, and statistical method is not a master key. Solid research knowledge and critical thinking of our brain are the most important in controlling confounding effect.