Preoperative risk modelling for oesophagectomy: A systematic review

BACKGROUND Oesophageal cancer is a frequently observed and lethal malignancy worldwide.Surgical resection remains a realistic option for curative intent in the early stages of the disease.However,the decision to undertake oesophagectomy is significant as it exposes the patient to a substantial risk of morbidity and mortality.Therefore,appropriate patient selection,counselling and resource allocation is important.Many tools have been developed to aid surgeons in appropriate decision-making.AIM To examine all multivariate risk models that use preoperative and intraoperative information and establish which have the most clinical utility.METHODS A systematic review of the MEDLINE,EMBASE and Cochrane databases was conducted from 2000-2020.The search terms applied were((Oesophagectomy)AND(Risk OR predict OR model OR score)AND(Outcomes OR complications OR morbidity OR mortality OR length of stay OR anastomotic leak)).The applied inclusion criteria were articles assessing multivariate based tools using exclusively preoperatively available data to predict perioperative patient outcomes following oesophagectomy.The exclusion criteria were publications that described models requiring intra-operative or post-operative data and articles appraising only univariate predictors such as American Society of Anesthesiologists score,cardiopulmonary fitness or pre-operative sarcopenia.Articles that exclusively assessed distant outcomes such as long-term survival were excluded as were publications using cohorts mixed with other surgical procedures.The articles generated from each search were collated,processed and then reported in accordance with PRISMA guidelines.All risk models were appraised for clinical credibility,methodological quality,performance,validation,and clinical effectiveness.RESULTS The initial search of composite databases yielded 8715 articles which reduced to 5827 following the deduplication process.After title and abstract screening,197 potentially relevant texts were retrieved for detailed review.Twenty-seven published studies were ultimately included which examined twenty-one multivariate risk models utilising exclusively preoperative data.Most models examined were clinically credible and were constructed with sound methodological quality,but model performance was often insufficient to prognosticate patient outcomes.Three risk models were identified as being promising in predicting perioperative mortality,including the National Quality Improvement Project surgical risk calculator,revised STS score and the Takeuchi model.Two studies predicted perioperative major morbidity,including the predicting postoperative complications score and prognostic nutritional index-multivariate models.Many of these models require external validation and demonstration of clinical effectiveness.CONCLUSION Whilst there are several promising models in predicting perioperative oesophagectomy outcomes,more research is needed to confirm their validity and demonstrate improved clinical outcomes with the adoption of these models.

Combined and intraoperative risk modelling for oesophagectomy:A systematic review

BACKGROUND Oesophageal cancer is the eighth most common malignancy worldwide and is associated with a poor prognosis.Oesophagectomy remains the best prospect for a cure if diagnosed in the early disease stages.However,the procedure is associated with significant morbidity and mortality and is undertaken only after careful consideration.Appropriate patient selection,counselling and resource allocation is essential.Numerous risk models have been devised to guide surgeons in making these decisions.AIM To evaluate which multivariate risk models,using intraoperative information with or without preoperative information,best predict perioperative oesophagectomy outcomes.METHODS A systematic review of the MEDLINE,EMBASE and Cochrane databases was undertaken from 2000-2020.The search terms used were[(Oesophagectomy)AND(Model OR Predict OR Risk OR score)AND(Mortality OR morbidity OR complications OR outcomes OR anastomotic leak OR length of stay)].Articles were included if they assessed multivariate based tools incorporating preoperative and intraoperative variables to forecast patient outcomes after oesophagectomy.Articles were excluded if they only required preoperative or any post-operative data.Studies appraising univariate risk predictors such as preoperative sarcopenia,cardiopulmonary fitness and American Society of Anesthesiologists score were also excluded.The review was conducted following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses model.All captured risk models were appraised for clinical credibility,methodological quality,performance,validation and clinical effectiveness.RESULTS Twenty published studies were identified which examined eleven multivariate risk models.Eight of these combined preoperative and intraoperative data and the remaining three used only intraoperative values.Only two risk models were identified as promising in predicting mortality,namely the Portsmouth physiological and operative severity score for the enumeration of mortality and morbidity(POSSUM)and POSSUM scores.A further two studies,the intraoperative factors and Esophagectomy surgical Apgar score based nomograms,adequately forecasted major morbidity.The latter two models are yet to have external validation and none have been tested for clinical effectiveness.CONCLUSION Despite the presence of some promising models in forecasting perioperative oesophagectomy outcomes,there is more research required to externally validate these models and demonstrate clinical benefit with the adoption of these models guiding postoperative care and allocating resources.