As forensic humanitarian and forensic human rights anthropology has continued to evolve,an ongoing concern in the field is meaningful engagement with survivors and the imperative to do no harm.For forensic anthropolog...As forensic humanitarian and forensic human rights anthropology has continued to evolve,an ongoing concern in the field is meaningful engagement with survivors and the imperative to do no harm.For forensic anthropologists attempting to engage in grassroots forensic intervention,unaffiliated with an international investigation,means for effectively accessing and engaging communities has not been widely discussed.Here,forensic anthropologists draw on multiple,cross-cultural contexts to discuss methods and techniques for introducing forensic partnerships to communities.To do this,the scientist must consider their positionality as well as that of the stakeholders,develop effective local relationships,and consider a community-grounded approach.This paper argues that drawing on broader cultural anthropological training,ultimately informs one’s ability to gain entry into at-risk and vulnerable communities while minimizing harm.To illustrate this point,examples are drawn from Canada,Uganda,Cyprus,and Somaliland.展开更多
基金We would also like to acknowledge that funding from the Wenner-Gren Foundation(8649,9075)National Science Foundation(132160)+1 种基金NIH MHIRT(5T37MD001378)University of Tennessee supported this research.
文摘As forensic humanitarian and forensic human rights anthropology has continued to evolve,an ongoing concern in the field is meaningful engagement with survivors and the imperative to do no harm.For forensic anthropologists attempting to engage in grassroots forensic intervention,unaffiliated with an international investigation,means for effectively accessing and engaging communities has not been widely discussed.Here,forensic anthropologists draw on multiple,cross-cultural contexts to discuss methods and techniques for introducing forensic partnerships to communities.To do this,the scientist must consider their positionality as well as that of the stakeholders,develop effective local relationships,and consider a community-grounded approach.This paper argues that drawing on broader cultural anthropological training,ultimately informs one’s ability to gain entry into at-risk and vulnerable communities while minimizing harm.To illustrate this point,examples are drawn from Canada,Uganda,Cyprus,and Somaliland.
