As college campuses reopened in fall 2020,we saw a large-scale experiment unfold on the efficacy of various strategies to contain the SARS-CoV-2 virus.Traditional individual surveillance testing via nasal swabs and/or...As college campuses reopened in fall 2020,we saw a large-scale experiment unfold on the efficacy of various strategies to contain the SARS-CoV-2 virus.Traditional individual surveillance testing via nasal swabs and/or saliva is among the measures that colleges are pursuing to reduce the spread of the virus on campus.Additionally,some colleges are testing wastewater on their campuses for signs of infection,which can provide an early warning signal for campuses to locate COVID-positive individuals.However,a representation of wastewater surveillance has not yet been incorporated into epidemiological models for college campuses,nor has the efficacy of wastewater screening been evaluated relative to traditional individual surveillance testing,within the structure of these models.Here,we implement a new model component for wastewater surveillance within an established epidemiological model for college campuses.We use a hypothetical residential university to evaluate the efficacy of wastewater surveillance for maintaining low infection rates.We find that wastewater sampling with a 1-day lag to initiate individual screening tests,plus completing the subsequent tests within a 4-day period can keep overall infections within 5%of the infection rates seen with traditional individual surveillance testing.Our results also indicate that wastewater surveillance can effectively reduce the number of false positive cases by identifying subpopulations for surveillance testing where infectious individuals are more likely to be found.Through a Monte Carlo risk analysis,we find that surveillance testing that relies solely on wastewater sampling can be fragile against scenarios with high viral reproductive numbers and high rates of infection of campus community members by outside sources.These results point to the practical importance of additional surveillance measures to limit the spread of the virus on campus and the necessity of a proactive response to the initial signs of outbreak.展开更多
文摘As college campuses reopened in fall 2020,we saw a large-scale experiment unfold on the efficacy of various strategies to contain the SARS-CoV-2 virus.Traditional individual surveillance testing via nasal swabs and/or saliva is among the measures that colleges are pursuing to reduce the spread of the virus on campus.Additionally,some colleges are testing wastewater on their campuses for signs of infection,which can provide an early warning signal for campuses to locate COVID-positive individuals.However,a representation of wastewater surveillance has not yet been incorporated into epidemiological models for college campuses,nor has the efficacy of wastewater screening been evaluated relative to traditional individual surveillance testing,within the structure of these models.Here,we implement a new model component for wastewater surveillance within an established epidemiological model for college campuses.We use a hypothetical residential university to evaluate the efficacy of wastewater surveillance for maintaining low infection rates.We find that wastewater sampling with a 1-day lag to initiate individual screening tests,plus completing the subsequent tests within a 4-day period can keep overall infections within 5%of the infection rates seen with traditional individual surveillance testing.Our results also indicate that wastewater surveillance can effectively reduce the number of false positive cases by identifying subpopulations for surveillance testing where infectious individuals are more likely to be found.Through a Monte Carlo risk analysis,we find that surveillance testing that relies solely on wastewater sampling can be fragile against scenarios with high viral reproductive numbers and high rates of infection of campus community members by outside sources.These results point to the practical importance of additional surveillance measures to limit the spread of the virus on campus and the necessity of a proactive response to the initial signs of outbreak.
