The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the efficiency of early enteral nutritional support in patients undergoing laryngectomy. We retrospectively reviewed and analyzed 329 laryngeal cancer patients who unde...The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the efficiency of early enteral nutritional support in patients undergoing laryngectomy. We retrospectively reviewed and analyzed 329 laryngeal cancer patients who underwent total or partial laryngectomy from November 2003 to July 2013 in our hospital. Of those patients, 278 were given enteral nutrition (EN group) with elemental formulations through a nasogastric tube beginning within 24 hours after the surgery, while 51 chose not to receive the elemental formulations and were on a homogenate diet (convenience diet group, CD group), which was also given through a nasogastric tube. The clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups. Thirteen patients in the EN group (13/278, 4.68%) and six patients in the CD group (6/51, 11.76%) developed fistulas. The difference was statistically significant (P < 0.046). The differences in the post-surgical infection rate, average length of hospitalization and other clinical indicators between the two groups were not statistically significant. In conclusion, early enteral nutrition should be recommended in patients undergoing laryngectomy, and convenience diet is not as effective as the commercial formulation in reducing the risk of fistula formation.展开更多
文摘The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the efficiency of early enteral nutritional support in patients undergoing laryngectomy. We retrospectively reviewed and analyzed 329 laryngeal cancer patients who underwent total or partial laryngectomy from November 2003 to July 2013 in our hospital. Of those patients, 278 were given enteral nutrition (EN group) with elemental formulations through a nasogastric tube beginning within 24 hours after the surgery, while 51 chose not to receive the elemental formulations and were on a homogenate diet (convenience diet group, CD group), which was also given through a nasogastric tube. The clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups. Thirteen patients in the EN group (13/278, 4.68%) and six patients in the CD group (6/51, 11.76%) developed fistulas. The difference was statistically significant (P < 0.046). The differences in the post-surgical infection rate, average length of hospitalization and other clinical indicators between the two groups were not statistically significant. In conclusion, early enteral nutrition should be recommended in patients undergoing laryngectomy, and convenience diet is not as effective as the commercial formulation in reducing the risk of fistula formation.
