Background:Currently,there are no drugs that have been proven to be effective against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2(SARS-CoV-2).Because of its broad antiviral activity,interferon(IFN)should be evalua...Background:Currently,there are no drugs that have been proven to be effective against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2(SARS-CoV-2).Because of its broad antiviral activity,interferon(IFN)should be evaluated as a potential therapeutic agent for treatment of coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19),especially while COVID-19-specific therapies are still under development.Methods:Confirmed COVID-19 patients hospitalized in the First Affiliated Hospital,School of Medicine,Zhejiang University in Hangzhou,China,from January 19 to February 19,2020 were enrolled in a retrospective study.The patients were separated into an IFN group and a control group according to whether they received initial IFN-α2 b inhalation treatment after admission.Propensity-score matching was used to balance the confounding factors.Results:A total of 104 confirmed COVID-19 patients,68 in the IFN group and 36 in the control group,were enrolled.Less hypertension(27.9%vs.55.6%,P=0.006),dyspnea(8.8%vs.25.0%,P=0.025),or diarrhea(4.4%vs.19.4%,P=0.030)was observed in the IFN group.Lower levels of albumin and C-reactive protein and higher level of sodium were observed in the IFN group.Glucocorticoid dosage was lower in the IFN group(median,40 vs.80 mg/d,P=0.025).Compared to the control group,fewer patients in the IFN group were ventilated(13.2%vs.33.3%,P=0.015)and admitted to intensive care unit(ICU)(16.2%vs.44.4%,P=0.002).There were also fewer critical patients in the IFN group(7.4%vs.25.0%,P=0.017)upon admission.Although complications during admission process were comparable between groups,the discharge rate(85.3%vs.66.7%,P=0.027)was higher and the hospitalization time(16 vs.21 d,P=0.015)was shorter in the IFN group.When other confounding factors were not considered,virus shedding time(10 vs.13 d,P=0.014)was also shorter in the IFN group.However,when the influence of other factors was eliminated using propensity score matching,virus shedding time was not significantly shorter than that of the control group(12 vs.15 d,P=0.206).Conclusions:IFN-α2 b spray inhalation did not shorten virus shedding time of SARS-CoV-2 in hospitalized patients.展开更多
基金Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(No.81700549)the National Major Science and Technology Research Projects for the Control and Prevention of Major Infectious Diseases in China(No.2017ZX10202202)the Medical and Health Research Program of Zhejiang Province(No.2015KYB144),China。
文摘Background:Currently,there are no drugs that have been proven to be effective against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2(SARS-CoV-2).Because of its broad antiviral activity,interferon(IFN)should be evaluated as a potential therapeutic agent for treatment of coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19),especially while COVID-19-specific therapies are still under development.Methods:Confirmed COVID-19 patients hospitalized in the First Affiliated Hospital,School of Medicine,Zhejiang University in Hangzhou,China,from January 19 to February 19,2020 were enrolled in a retrospective study.The patients were separated into an IFN group and a control group according to whether they received initial IFN-α2 b inhalation treatment after admission.Propensity-score matching was used to balance the confounding factors.Results:A total of 104 confirmed COVID-19 patients,68 in the IFN group and 36 in the control group,were enrolled.Less hypertension(27.9%vs.55.6%,P=0.006),dyspnea(8.8%vs.25.0%,P=0.025),or diarrhea(4.4%vs.19.4%,P=0.030)was observed in the IFN group.Lower levels of albumin and C-reactive protein and higher level of sodium were observed in the IFN group.Glucocorticoid dosage was lower in the IFN group(median,40 vs.80 mg/d,P=0.025).Compared to the control group,fewer patients in the IFN group were ventilated(13.2%vs.33.3%,P=0.015)and admitted to intensive care unit(ICU)(16.2%vs.44.4%,P=0.002).There were also fewer critical patients in the IFN group(7.4%vs.25.0%,P=0.017)upon admission.Although complications during admission process were comparable between groups,the discharge rate(85.3%vs.66.7%,P=0.027)was higher and the hospitalization time(16 vs.21 d,P=0.015)was shorter in the IFN group.When other confounding factors were not considered,virus shedding time(10 vs.13 d,P=0.014)was also shorter in the IFN group.However,when the influence of other factors was eliminated using propensity score matching,virus shedding time was not significantly shorter than that of the control group(12 vs.15 d,P=0.206).Conclusions:IFN-α2 b spray inhalation did not shorten virus shedding time of SARS-CoV-2 in hospitalized patients.
