BACKGROUND Endoscopic resection(ER)and laparoscopic resection(LR)have been widely used for the treatment of non-metastatic gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors(gGISTs)(2-5 cm),but there are no selection criteria fo...BACKGROUND Endoscopic resection(ER)and laparoscopic resection(LR)have been widely used for the treatment of non-metastatic gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors(gGISTs)(2-5 cm),but there are no selection criteria for their application.AIM To provide a reference for the development of standardized treatment strategies for gGISTs.METHODS Clinical baseline characteristics,histopathological results,and short-term and long-term outcomes of patients who treated with ER or LR for gGISTs of 2-5 cm in Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province from January 2014 to August 2022 were retrospectively reviewed.Propensity score matching(PSM)was employed to achieve balance in baseline characteristics of the two groups.RESULTS Among 206 patients,135 were in the ER group and 71 in the LR group.The ER group had significantly smaller tumors[3.5 cm(3.0-4.0 cm)vs 4.2 cm(3.3-5.0 cm),P<0.001]and different tumor locations(P=0.048).After PSM,59 pairs of patients were balanced.After matching,the baseline characteristics of the ER and LR groups did not differ significantly from each other.Compared with LR,ER had faster recovery of diet(P=0.046)and fewer postoperative symptoms(P=0.040).LR achieved a higher complete resection rate(P<0.001)and shorter operation time(P<0.001).No significant differences were observed in postoperative hospital stay(P=0.478),hospital costs(P=0.469),complication rates(P>0.999),pathological features(mitosis,P=0.262;National Institutes of Health risk classification,P=0.145),recurrence rates(P=0.476),or mortality rates(P=0.611).CONCLUSION Both ER and LR are safe and effective treatments for gGISTs.ER has less postoperative pain and faster recovery,while LR has a higher rate of complete resection.展开更多
基金Supported by The Medical Science and Technology Project of Zhejiang Province,China,No.2024KY1792The Health Science and Technology Program of Zhejiang Province,China,No.22PY101+2 种基金The Program of Taizhou Science and Technology Grant,China,No.22ywb08 and No.22ywb09The Scientific Research Fund Program of Enze Medical Center,China,No.22EZB12 and No.22EZC17The Open Fund of Key Laboratory of Key Laboratory of Minimally Invasive Techniques and Rapid Rehabilitation of Digestive System Tumor of Zhejiang Province,China,No.21SZDSYS15.
文摘BACKGROUND Endoscopic resection(ER)and laparoscopic resection(LR)have been widely used for the treatment of non-metastatic gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors(gGISTs)(2-5 cm),but there are no selection criteria for their application.AIM To provide a reference for the development of standardized treatment strategies for gGISTs.METHODS Clinical baseline characteristics,histopathological results,and short-term and long-term outcomes of patients who treated with ER or LR for gGISTs of 2-5 cm in Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province from January 2014 to August 2022 were retrospectively reviewed.Propensity score matching(PSM)was employed to achieve balance in baseline characteristics of the two groups.RESULTS Among 206 patients,135 were in the ER group and 71 in the LR group.The ER group had significantly smaller tumors[3.5 cm(3.0-4.0 cm)vs 4.2 cm(3.3-5.0 cm),P<0.001]and different tumor locations(P=0.048).After PSM,59 pairs of patients were balanced.After matching,the baseline characteristics of the ER and LR groups did not differ significantly from each other.Compared with LR,ER had faster recovery of diet(P=0.046)and fewer postoperative symptoms(P=0.040).LR achieved a higher complete resection rate(P<0.001)and shorter operation time(P<0.001).No significant differences were observed in postoperative hospital stay(P=0.478),hospital costs(P=0.469),complication rates(P>0.999),pathological features(mitosis,P=0.262;National Institutes of Health risk classification,P=0.145),recurrence rates(P=0.476),or mortality rates(P=0.611).CONCLUSION Both ER and LR are safe and effective treatments for gGISTs.ER has less postoperative pain and faster recovery,while LR has a higher rate of complete resection.
