Objective:A large prostate size(>80 m L)of benign prostatic hyperplasia(BPH)is technically challenging to treat surgically.This study aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of super-selective prostatic artery...Objective:A large prostate size(>80 m L)of benign prostatic hyperplasia(BPH)is technically challenging to treat surgically.This study aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of super-selective prostatic artery embolization(PAE)for the treatment of urinary retention caused by large BPH.Methods:A total of 21 patients with urinary retention,indwelling urinary catheter,or suprapubic cystostomy as a consequence of giant BPH(prostate volume[PV]>80 mL)who sought treatment between January 2013 and December 2017 were enrolled.A microcatheter(1.9–2.7 Fr)and a"two-step embolization"combining 50-μm and100-μm polyvinyl alcohol embolization particles were used in all patients.International Prostate Symptom Score(IPSS),quality of life(QoL),PV,and prostate-specific antigen(PSA)were evaluated at 3,6,and 12 months postPAE.Clinical success was defined as removal of urinary catheter or suprapubic cystostomy and ability to void spontaneously.Results:The clinical success rate was 95.2%(20/21).Compared with pre-procedural values,IPSS,QoL,PV,and PSA showed statistically significant differences at 3,6,and 12 months post-PAE(P<0.05).There were no serious complications after PAE.Conclusions:PAE was safe and effective for the treatment of urinary retention caused by large BPH in patients without surgical treatment options.展开更多
文摘Objective:A large prostate size(>80 m L)of benign prostatic hyperplasia(BPH)is technically challenging to treat surgically.This study aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of super-selective prostatic artery embolization(PAE)for the treatment of urinary retention caused by large BPH.Methods:A total of 21 patients with urinary retention,indwelling urinary catheter,or suprapubic cystostomy as a consequence of giant BPH(prostate volume[PV]>80 mL)who sought treatment between January 2013 and December 2017 were enrolled.A microcatheter(1.9–2.7 Fr)and a"two-step embolization"combining 50-μm and100-μm polyvinyl alcohol embolization particles were used in all patients.International Prostate Symptom Score(IPSS),quality of life(QoL),PV,and prostate-specific antigen(PSA)were evaluated at 3,6,and 12 months postPAE.Clinical success was defined as removal of urinary catheter or suprapubic cystostomy and ability to void spontaneously.Results:The clinical success rate was 95.2%(20/21).Compared with pre-procedural values,IPSS,QoL,PV,and PSA showed statistically significant differences at 3,6,and 12 months post-PAE(P<0.05).There were no serious complications after PAE.Conclusions:PAE was safe and effective for the treatment of urinary retention caused by large BPH in patients without surgical treatment options.