Ciclesonide Use in COVID-19: Not All Steroids Are the Same

Introduction: The inflammatory mechanisms of COVID-19 suggest that corticosteroids may be beneficial, but their benefits must outweigh their potential risks. The RECOVERY trial results suggest that dexamethasone 6 mg/day (but not other steroids) may confer mortality benefits on ventilated COVID-19 patients. Methods: This is a narrative review of the literature about the use of ciclesonide and dexamethasone for COVID-19 patients. Literature is being created rapidly and this review is offered as a state-of-the-science narration. Results: The SARS-CoV-2 virus is an RNA virus whose RNA is transcribed via open reading frames, making its elimination difficult. Coronaviruses have evolved multiple strategies for proteolytic activation of the spike;viral replication occurs entirely in the cytoplasm. In this connection, the RNA-cleaving endoribonuclease (NSP-15 also known as EndoU) may play a key role by facilitating viral double-stranded RNA recognition by the host’s macrophages. Furthermore, the virus is able to undergo RNA recombination rapidly, enabling it to evade host immunity and develop drug resistance. Ciclesonide is an inhaled corticosteroid that reduces lung inflammation and blocks the activity of specific kinases which may explain its anti-inflammatory effect. Dexamethasone is known to reduce mortality in ventilated COVID-19 patients. Discussion: Systemic corticosteroids were used in previous coronavirus epidemics (SARS and MERS) and pulmonary histology of these patients is similar to those in COVID-19 patients. Acute respiratory distress syndrome is the main cause of death in most COVID-19 infections and steroids may be effective in addressing that condition, brought on by cytokine storm. However, it should be noted that inhaled steroids likely have a narrower window for effect than systemic regimens. Conclusion: Dexamethasone has been proven to confer mortality benefits on ventilated COVID-19 patients and may be used with inhaled ciclesonide, which has few side effects and can be locally metabolized. Further study is needed.

Treating Insomnia in Older Adult Patients: Limiting Benzodiazepine Use

As aging comes, an increased prevalence of medical maladies and chronic pain independently or interactively disrupt sleep, which in turn can exacerbate either one. Furthermore, anxiety about pain can further negatively impact sleep. Fortunately, good quality sleep can improve pain management. Because benzodiazepine receptor agonists (including the “Z” drugs) can reduce anxiety and improve sleep, they seem a convenient choice. However, their use in this population, particularly for more than short-term (guidelines range from 2 to 6 weeks max), is not recommended because of increased likelihood of falls, further disruption of sleep, dependence, and problems with discontinuation (withdrawal). Besides, this population is often likely to take concomitant medication for pain or other central nervous system depressants leading to potentially serious and even life-threatening interactions involving synergistic amplification of respiratory depression (opioids being a particularly dangerous interaction). Therefore, insomnia in older adults should ideally be treated with a non-benzodiazepine receptor agonist;if indicated, they may be used, but should be closely monitored and tapered to avoid long-term adverse problems (direct or from withdrawal). Older adult patients with insomnia may be more optimally treated with sleep aids that do not interact with the GABAA receptor.

The Place of Community Rescue Naloxone in a Public Health Crisis of Opioid Overdose

The recent large increase in deaths involving opioids (whether prescription or illicit, pure or adulterated, alone or in combination with other drugs) is the manifestation of a complex, and multifaceted problem consisting of psychological, psychosocial, medical, legal, regulatory, economic, cultural, and political components, among others. Because the problem involves issues related to both supply and demand, the solution is not obvious, simple, or quick. There is no easy fix. Preventing and treating opioid misuse and abuse requires a comprehensive, time-intensive, and expensive intervention supported by public policy and support through coordinated medical, regulatory, legal, and financial guidelines and practice. But until the long-term problems can be fixed, the immediate crisis of overdose deaths can be ameliorated by making available an opioid receptor antagonist to reverse the respiratory depression that is the cause of death to those who are in the best position to administer it in time (professionals, untrained bystanders, and even fellow drug abusers). The statistics overwhelmingly demonstrate that this is a life-saving medical intervention. Yet, there is still uncertainty about this intervention, and even some opposition to it. We describe the scientific basis for the approach and the issues surrounding its use to treat accidental or intentional overdose by pain patients, recreational opioid users, and addicts. We also describe the calls to limit the number of times it should be available to a user and the limitations of its effectiveness—mainly that it only addresses the acute death crisis, not the underlying problems that led to it.