AIM:To investigate the rates of polyp detection in a mixed risk population using standard definition (SDC) vs high definition colonoscopes (HDC).METHODS:This was a retrospective cohort comparative study of 3 colonosco...AIM:To investigate the rates of polyp detection in a mixed risk population using standard definition (SDC) vs high definition colonoscopes (HDC).METHODS:This was a retrospective cohort comparative study of 3 colonoscopists who each consecutively performed 150 SDC (307,200 pixel) and 150 HDC (792,576 pixels) in a community teaching hospital.RESULTS:A total of 900 colonoscopies were evaluated (mean age 56,46.8% men),450 with each resolution.Polyps of any type were detected in 46.0% of patients using SDC and 43.3% with HDC (P=0.42).There was no significant difference between the overall number of polyps,HDC (397) and SDC (410),detected among all patients examined,(P=0.73).One or more adenomatous polyps were detected in 24.2% of patients with HDC and 24.9% of patients with SDC colonoscopy (P=0.82).There was no significant difference between HDC (M=0.41) and SDC (M=0.42) regarding adenomatous polyp (P=0.88) or advanced adenoma (P=0.56) detection rate among all patients examined.CONCLUSION:HDC did not improve yield of adenomatous polyp,advanced adenoma or overall polyp detection in a population of individuals with mixed risk for colorectal cancer.展开更多
AIM: To compare the bowel cleansing efficacy of same day ingestion of 4-L sulfa-free polyethylene glycol (4-L SF-PEG) vs 2-L polyethylene glycol solution with ascorbic acid (2-L PEG + Asc) in patients undergoing after...AIM: To compare the bowel cleansing efficacy of same day ingestion of 4-L sulfa-free polyethylene glycol (4-L SF-PEG) vs 2-L polyethylene glycol solution with ascorbic acid (2-L PEG + Asc) in patients undergoing afternoon colonoscopy.展开更多
基金Supported by Cleveland Clinic Florida Institution Review Committee
文摘AIM:To investigate the rates of polyp detection in a mixed risk population using standard definition (SDC) vs high definition colonoscopes (HDC).METHODS:This was a retrospective cohort comparative study of 3 colonoscopists who each consecutively performed 150 SDC (307,200 pixel) and 150 HDC (792,576 pixels) in a community teaching hospital.RESULTS:A total of 900 colonoscopies were evaluated (mean age 56,46.8% men),450 with each resolution.Polyps of any type were detected in 46.0% of patients using SDC and 43.3% with HDC (P=0.42).There was no significant difference between the overall number of polyps,HDC (397) and SDC (410),detected among all patients examined,(P=0.73).One or more adenomatous polyps were detected in 24.2% of patients with HDC and 24.9% of patients with SDC colonoscopy (P=0.82).There was no significant difference between HDC (M=0.41) and SDC (M=0.42) regarding adenomatous polyp (P=0.88) or advanced adenoma (P=0.56) detection rate among all patients examined.CONCLUSION:HDC did not improve yield of adenomatous polyp,advanced adenoma or overall polyp detection in a population of individuals with mixed risk for colorectal cancer.
文摘AIM: To compare the bowel cleansing efficacy of same day ingestion of 4-L sulfa-free polyethylene glycol (4-L SF-PEG) vs 2-L polyethylene glycol solution with ascorbic acid (2-L PEG + Asc) in patients undergoing afternoon colonoscopy.
