期刊文献+
共找到2篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
Connexins in neurons and glia: targets for intervention in disease and injury 被引量:1
1
作者 Keith B.Moore john o'brien 《Neural Regeneration Research》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2015年第7期1013-1017,共5页
Both neurons and glia throughout the central nervous system are organized into networks by gap junctions. Among glia, gap junctions facilitate metabolic homeostasis and intercellular communication. Among neurons, gap ... Both neurons and glia throughout the central nervous system are organized into networks by gap junctions. Among glia, gap junctions facilitate metabolic homeostasis and intercellular communication. Among neurons, gap junctions form electrical synapses that function primarily for communication. However, in neurodegenerative states due to disease or injury gap junctions may be detrimental to survival. Electrical synapses may facilitate hyperactivity and bystander killing among neurons, while gap junction hemichannels in glia may facilitate inflammatory signaling and scar formation. Advances in understanding mechanisms of plasticity of electrical synapses and development of molecular therapeutics to target glial gap junctions and hemichannels offer new hope to pharmacologically limit neuronal degeneration and enhance recovery. 展开更多
关键词 ischemia retinal degeneration amacrine cells astrocytes dopamine receptors adenosine receptors NMDA receptors connexin mimetic peptides
下载PDF
血管性认知损害诊断的进一步规范化:血管性认知损害分类共识研究组指南 被引量:71
2
作者 Olivia A. Skrobot Sandra E. Black +18 位作者 Christopher Chen Charles DeCarli Timo Erkinjuntti Gary A. Ford Rajesh N. Kalaria john o'brien Leonardo Pantoni Florence Pasquier Gustavo C. Roman Anders Wallin Perminder Sachdev Ingmar Skoog the VICCCS group Yoav Ben-Shlomo Anthony P. Passmore Seth Love Patrick G. Kehoe 朱婷珂 徐俊 《国际脑血管病杂志》 2018年第4期241-250,共10页
引言血管性认知损害(vascular cognitive impairment,VCI)诊断共识的缺乏(体现为多种不同评估方案的使用),妨碍了对其理解和治疗的推进.多个国家的大量临床医生和研究人员参与了2个阶段血管性认知损害分类共识研究(Vascular Impair... 引言血管性认知损害(vascular cognitive impairment,VCI)诊断共识的缺乏(体现为多种不同评估方案的使用),妨碍了对其理解和治疗的推进.多个国家的大量临床医生和研究人员参与了2个阶段血管性认知损害分类共识研究(Vascular Impairment of Cognition Classification Consensus Study,VICCCS),旨在就VCI的诊断原则(VICCCS-1)和诊断方案(VICCCS-2)达成一致意见.本文提供了VICCCS-2的相关内容.方法使用VICCCS-1达成的原则和已发表的诊断指南作为在线德尔菲(Delphi)调查的参考基点,以期对VCI的临床诊断达成共识.结果共进行了6轮调查,每轮有65~79名专家参与,他们就VICCCS修订的轻度和重度VCI的诊断指南达成共识,并肯定了美国国立神经疾病与卒中研究所-加拿大卒中网(National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke–Canadian Stroke Network,NINDS-CSN)发布的神经心理学评估方案和对影像学检查的推荐意见.讨论VICCCS-2建议规范化应用NINDS-CSN推荐的神经心理学和影像学评估方案诊断VCI,以促进研究协作. 展开更多
关键词 血管性认知损害 血管性痴呆 指南 标准 共识 德尔菲法
原文传递
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部