Tumor biopsy and patient enrollment in clinical trials for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

Tumor biopsies may help to reliably distinguish hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC) from other tumors, mostly cholangiocarcinoma as well as to identify the patient populations who most benefit from target-driven HCC treatments, in order to improve the success rate of experimental therapies. Clarifying tumor biology may also lead to identify biomarkers with prognostic role and/or enabling to predict response or resistance to therapies. Recently, clinical trials have more efficiently included biomarker endpoints and increasingly collected tumor tissue from enrolled patients. Due to their frail status and sometimes fast-progressing disease, the performance status of patients with HCC progressing on first-line therapy can deteriorate quickly, preventing their enrollment in clinical trials. However, the challenge of identifying the proper patient at the proper time can be overcome by periodic inter-department meetings involving the key specialists taking care of HCC patients, and solid networks between research centers and referring institutions. An early planned biopsy would also facilitate timely inclusion of patients in biology-driven clinical trials. Ultimately, institution of multidisciplinary teams can optimize treatment choice, biopsy timing, and quick enrollment of patients in clinical trials, before their performance status deteriorates.

Polymorphism AGT2(rs4762)is involved in the development of dermatologic events:Proof-of-concept in hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with sorafenib

BACKGROUND Dermatologic adverse events(DAEs)are associated with a better outcome in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC)irrespective of the therapeutic agent received.The exact mechanisms associated with the development of DAEs are unknown although several studies point to direct toxicity of tyrosine kinase inhibitors(TKIs)to the skin or an immune-mediated reaction triggered by the oncologic treatment.As is the case in other conditions,individual genetic variants may partially explain a higher risk of DAEs.AIM To evaluate the contribution of several gene variants to the risk of developing DAEs in HCC patients treated with TKIs.METHODS We first analyzed 27 single-nucleotide polymorphisms(SNPs)from 12 genes selected as potential predictors of adverse event(AE)development in HCC patients treated with sorafenib[Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer 1(BCLC1)cohort].Three additional cohorts were analyzed for AGT1(rs699)and AGT2(rs4762)polymorphisms-initially identified as predictors of DAEs:BCLC2(n=79),Northern Italy(n=221)and Naples(n=69)cohorts,respectively.The relation between SNPs and DAEs and death were assessed by univariate and multivariate Cox regression models,and presented with hazard ratios and their 95%confidence intervals(95%CI).RESULTS The BCLC1 cohort showed that patients with arterial hypertension(AHT)(HR=1.61;P value=0.007)and/or AGT SNPs had an increased risk of DAEs.Thereafter,AGT2(rs4762)AA genotype was found to be linked to a statistically significant increased probability of DAEs(HR=5.97;P value=0.0201,AA vs GG)in the Northern Italy cohort by multivariate analysis adjusted for BCLC stage,ECOG-PS,diabetes and AHT.The value of this genetic marker was externally validated in the cohort combining the BCLC1,BCLC2 and Naples cohorts[HR=3.12(95%CI:1.2-8.14),P value=0.0199,AGT2(rs4762)AA vs AG genotype and HR=2.73(95%CI:1.18-6.32)P value=0.0188,AGT2(rs4762)AA vs GG genotype].None of the other gene variants tested were found to be associated with the risk of DAE development.CONCLUSION DAE development in HCC patients receiving TKIs could be explained by the AGT2(rs4762)gene variant.If validated in other anti-oncogenic treatments,it might be considered a good prognosis marker.

Resection vs.transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma:a never ending challenge

Liver transplantation(LT)is fully established in conventional clinical care for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC).The long-term survival of transplanted patients competes with the survival offered by surgical resection and this sets the scene for a debate for which a consensus answer based in evidence is not available.Resection outcomes have steadily improved due a refined selection of patients and the availability of other effective options such as ablation or locoregional approach(chemoembolization or radioembolization)has allowed to avoid its indication as a last effective resource for desperate cases.Same evolution has taken place for LT as it was early shown that if the tumor burden was reduced the survival results would be encouraging(1).