期刊文献+
共找到2篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
即刻临时修复在延期种植和即刻种植中的应用:5年的前瞻性评价
1
作者 Lyndon F. Cooper Glenn J. Reside +7 位作者 Filiep Raes Joan Soliva Garriga Luis Giner Tarrida jorg wiltfang Matthias Kern Hugo De Bruyn 周文娟 柳忠豪 《中国口腔医学继续教育杂志》 2016年第2期69-76,共8页
目的:本5年的前瞻性多中心研究通过比较其种植体成功率和存留率.种植体周围健康情况和软组织反应,牙槽嵴水平的稳定性以及并发症率,对上颌前牙区延期或即刻植入OsseoSpeed种植体行即刻负重的病例进行评价。材料和方法:选取单颗前牙... 目的:本5年的前瞻性多中心研究通过比较其种植体成功率和存留率.种植体周围健康情况和软组织反应,牙槽嵴水平的稳定性以及并发症率,对上颌前牙区延期或即刻植入OsseoSpeed种植体行即刻负重的病例进行评价。材料和方法:选取单颗前牙缺失要求种植治疗的患者进行种植治疗并行即刻临时修复,12周后行全瓷冠永久修复。随访5年观察种植体存留率、骨水平、软组织水平以及种植体周围健康状况。结果:共计纳入130位患者,其中55位患者行即刻种植,58位患者行延期种植。5年后,45位即刻种植患者及49位延期种植患者仍在研究队列中。在第1年内,即刻种植组有3例失败(存留率946%),延期种植组有1例失败(存留率983%),差异不具有统计学意义。5年后,牙槽间隔的骨水平距种植体参考点的平均距离分别为0.43±0.63mm和0.38±0.62mm(无显著统计学差异)。两组的龈乳头均随时间增加,永久冠修复后,种植体周围黏膜高度保持在稳定水平。延期种植组,与翻瓣手术相比,不翻瓣手术增加了种植体周围黏膜的量(平均0.78±1.34mmvs 0.19士0.79mm)。结论:5年后,即刻种植组和延期种植组相比,行即刻临时修复后,两组用于评价种植体成功率及种植体美学效果的软硬组织参数接近。整体的组织反应及种植体存留率支持在愈合后的牙槽骨及状态良好的拔牙窝种植行即刻临时修复。 展开更多
关键词 牙种植 拔牙窝 即刻负重 边缘骨水平 软组织
原文传递
Effect of ultraviolet photofunctionalization of dental titanium implants on osseointegration
2
作者 Christian MEHL Matthias KERN +3 位作者 Friederike NEUMANN Telse BAHR jorg wiltfang Volker GASSLING 《Journal of Zhejiang University-Science B(Biomedicine & Biotechnology)》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2018年第7期525-534,共10页
Objective: The aim of the current study was to evaluate the effect of ultraviolet(UV) photofunctionalization of dental titanium implants with exposure to the oral cavity on osseointegration in an animal model. Meth... Objective: The aim of the current study was to evaluate the effect of ultraviolet(UV) photofunctionalization of dental titanium implants with exposure to the oral cavity on osseointegration in an animal model. Methods: Forty-eight titanium implants(Camlog~? Conelog~? 4.3 mmx9.0 mm) were placed epicrestally into the edentulous jaws of three minipigs and implant stability was assessed by measuring the implant stability quotient(ISQ). Prior to implantation half of the implants were photofunctionalized with intense UV-light. After three months, the implants were exposed and ISQ was measured again. After six months of implant exposure, the minipigs were sacrificed and the harvested specimens were analyzed using histomorphometric, light, and fluorescence microscopy. Main results: Forty-two of 48 implants osseointegrated. The overall mean bone-implant contact area(BIC) was(64±22)%. No significant differences were found in BIC or ISQ value(multivariate analysis of variance(MANOVA), P〉0.05) between implants with and without exposure to UV photofunctionalization. Conclusions: No significant effects were observed on osseointegration of dental titanium implants nine months after exposure of UV photofunctionalization. 展开更多
关键词 Dental implant OSSEOINTEGRATION Photofunctionalization
原文传递
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部