Ebola virus disease is a complex zoonosis that is highly virulent in humans. Despite its sorely pathogenic and lethal nature, survivors of this infection and even asymptomatic cases are able to develop both humoral an...Ebola virus disease is a complex zoonosis that is highly virulent in humans. Despite its sorely pathogenic and lethal nature, survivors of this infection and even asymptomatic cases are able to develop both humoral and cellular immunity against several Ebola virus (EBOV) proteins. We aimed at determining immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies level against two Ebola viral antigens, the glycoprotein and the nucleoprotein in Ebola survivors and their relatives. Anti-EBOV glycoprotein (GP) and nucleoprotein (NP) IgG antibodies were quantified using ELISA. We enrolled 199 participants in two different sites as follow: 91 survivors at the Loreto clinic and 70 survivors with 38 relatives of Sierra Leone Association of Ebola Survivors Bombali Branch (SLAESB) tested for anti-EBOV NP and anti-EBOV GP IgG antibodies. Our findings revealed that the median anti-EBOV IgG level among survivors was 5.7128 U/ml [IQR: 2.793 - 7.783] for anti-EBOV GP IgG and 4.431 U/ml [IQR: 2.083 - 7.696] for anti-EBOV NP IgG. Survivors relatives had a median anti-EBOV GP IgG level of ?0.7128 U/ml [IQR: -0.903 to -0.04327] and -2.711 U/ml [IQR: -4.01 to -1.918] for anti-EBOV NP IgG. We observed that IgG levels in survivors were higher than in relatives with a significant difference of about 0.0001. The median value of anti-EBOV IgG level among seropositive relatives was 0.7043 U/ml [IQR: 0.5686 to 3.716] for anti-EBOV GP IgG and 4.05 U/ml [IQR: 0.2765 to 7.759] for anti-EBOV NP IgG respectively. Interestingly, we observed that 3.30% of Loreto clinic survivors did not developed anti-EBOV NP IgG antibodies;also about 10% survivors of the SLAESB were not reactive to anti-EBOV NP IgG and 1.43% of these survivors did not express antibodies against the Ebola viral glycoprotein. Our work is consistent with previous published studies showing heterogeneity in both survivors and asymptomatic cases of Ebola infection developing adaptive immunity against EBOV proteins.展开更多
Viral hepatitis B and C infections are among the leading cause of death in Sub-Saharan Africa. Lack of knowledge and awareness in the general population as in health care settings may enhance the propagation of these ...Viral hepatitis B and C infections are among the leading cause of death in Sub-Saharan Africa. Lack of knowledge and awareness in the general population as in health care settings may enhance the propagation of these diseases. We aimed at determining the prevalence of HBV and HCV in Ebola survivors and health care workers (HCWs) of the Makeni town in Sierra Leone. We conducted a cross-sectional study during the last 2013-2016 Ebola outbreak in Makeni among Ebola survivors (N = 68) and 81 Health care workers from Holy Spirit hospital and Loreto clinic, two health care facilities in Makeni district. Serological markers of HBV (HBs Ag, anti-HBs Ab and anti-HBc Ab) and anti-HCV antibodies detection were done using ELISA techniques. The positive detection rates for HBs Ag, anti-HBs Ab and anti-HBc antibodies in Ebola survivors were 23.53% (16/68), 32.35% (22/68) and 88.89% (16/18) respectively. Survivors with a current HBV infection had a positive rate of 38.89% (7/18) and 16.66% (3/18) of them were considered immune due to past HBV infection. HCV prevalence was 26.47% (18/68) and about 10.29% (7/68) were HBV/HCV co-infected. The positive detection rates of HBsAg, anti-HBs Ab and anti-HBc Ab were 37.07% (30/81), 33.33% (27/81) and 30.86% (25/81) respectively in health care workers. We observed that 4.94% (4/81) of the HCWs were currently infected with HBV. Participants considered as immune due to past infection represented 23.47% (19/81) and those immune due to vaccination represented 2.47% (2/81). The prevalence of HCV infection among health staff was 2.47% (2/81) with 1.23% (1/81) being HBV/HCV co-infection. Our findings showed that viral hepatitis infection is a burden for Sierra Leone government. There is an urgent need to develop and implement strategies that could improve population immunization against HBV and vulgarization of HCV treatment programs.展开更多
<b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Background and Purpose: </span></b><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Klebsiella</span></i><span style=&q...<b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Background and Purpose: </span></b><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Klebsiella</span></i><span style="font-family:""><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> species are amongst the most common causes of a variety of community-acquired and hospital-acquired infections (HAI), characterized by high morbidity and mortality rates. Most infections caused by </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Klebsiella</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> species are usually treated using antibiotics. The aim of this study was to determine the antimicrobial resistance profile of </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Klebsiella</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> species isolated from in-patients and out-patients at the Yaounde University Teaching Hospital. The data generated will go a long way to improve on the choice of an adequate empiric antibiotic treatment for infections caused by </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Klebsiella</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> species. </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Methodology: </span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">A cross</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-</span><span style="font-family:""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">sectional descriptive study was carried out over a period of 6 months, spanning from February 2019 to July 2019 with a sample size of 37 isolates, obtained from 6 different clinical specimens. Identification of isolates was done using API 20E identification system (Bio</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">merieux SA, Lyon, France). Susceptibility to antibiotics was tested as de</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">scribed by Kirby-Bauer in 1956. Inhibition diameters were interpreted according to recommendations from the European Committee on Antimicrobial Suscepti</span><span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">bility Testing (EUCAST, 2019). </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Results and Conclusion: </span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Among the 37</span></span> <i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Klebsiella</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> isolates identified, </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Klebsiella pneumoniae</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> was the most prevalent species isolated with a percentage of 54.1%, followed by </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Klebsiella rhinoscleromatis</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> 18.9%, </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Klebsiella ozaenae </span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">16.2% and </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Klebsiella oxytoca</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">, 10.8%. The resistance pattern of </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Klebsiella</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> to amoxicillin, amoxicillin/clavulanate, tircacillin, tircacillin + clavulanic acid, piperacillin, piperacillin + tazobactam, cefalotin, cefuroxim, ceftazidime, cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, cefepime, imipenem, meropenem, aztreonam, amikacin, gentamicin, tobramycin, trimethoprim/</span></span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">sulfamethoxazole, nalidixic acid, pipemidic acid, norfloxacin, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, ofloxacin, and moxifoxacin was as follows;100%, 86.5%, 97.3%, 83.6%, 86.5%, 16.2%, 86.5%, 83.8%, 78.4%, 32.4%, 78.4%, 76.7%, 2.7%, 2.7%,</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">76.7%,</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">13.5%,</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">75.7%,</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">73.0%, 91.9%, 51.4%, 48.6%, 64.9%, 48.6%, 48.6%, 73.0% and </span><span style="font-family:""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">62.2% respectively. Multidrug resistance was observed in 94.6% of the </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Klebsiella</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> isolates. </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Conclusion: </span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">This study shows that the level of multidrug resistance is high. The isolates expressed good sensitivity to carbapenems, piperacillin + tazobactam, amikacin and high resistance to all other antimicrobials tested. Therefore, antimicrobial susceptibility test</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">ing prior to prescriptions should be encouraged and sensitization of the population about consequences of inappropriate antibiotic treatment and auto medication should be enforced as a mean</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">s</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> to curb antimicrobial resistance</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">.展开更多
文摘Ebola virus disease is a complex zoonosis that is highly virulent in humans. Despite its sorely pathogenic and lethal nature, survivors of this infection and even asymptomatic cases are able to develop both humoral and cellular immunity against several Ebola virus (EBOV) proteins. We aimed at determining immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies level against two Ebola viral antigens, the glycoprotein and the nucleoprotein in Ebola survivors and their relatives. Anti-EBOV glycoprotein (GP) and nucleoprotein (NP) IgG antibodies were quantified using ELISA. We enrolled 199 participants in two different sites as follow: 91 survivors at the Loreto clinic and 70 survivors with 38 relatives of Sierra Leone Association of Ebola Survivors Bombali Branch (SLAESB) tested for anti-EBOV NP and anti-EBOV GP IgG antibodies. Our findings revealed that the median anti-EBOV IgG level among survivors was 5.7128 U/ml [IQR: 2.793 - 7.783] for anti-EBOV GP IgG and 4.431 U/ml [IQR: 2.083 - 7.696] for anti-EBOV NP IgG. Survivors relatives had a median anti-EBOV GP IgG level of ?0.7128 U/ml [IQR: -0.903 to -0.04327] and -2.711 U/ml [IQR: -4.01 to -1.918] for anti-EBOV NP IgG. We observed that IgG levels in survivors were higher than in relatives with a significant difference of about 0.0001. The median value of anti-EBOV IgG level among seropositive relatives was 0.7043 U/ml [IQR: 0.5686 to 3.716] for anti-EBOV GP IgG and 4.05 U/ml [IQR: 0.2765 to 7.759] for anti-EBOV NP IgG respectively. Interestingly, we observed that 3.30% of Loreto clinic survivors did not developed anti-EBOV NP IgG antibodies;also about 10% survivors of the SLAESB were not reactive to anti-EBOV NP IgG and 1.43% of these survivors did not express antibodies against the Ebola viral glycoprotein. Our work is consistent with previous published studies showing heterogeneity in both survivors and asymptomatic cases of Ebola infection developing adaptive immunity against EBOV proteins.
文摘Viral hepatitis B and C infections are among the leading cause of death in Sub-Saharan Africa. Lack of knowledge and awareness in the general population as in health care settings may enhance the propagation of these diseases. We aimed at determining the prevalence of HBV and HCV in Ebola survivors and health care workers (HCWs) of the Makeni town in Sierra Leone. We conducted a cross-sectional study during the last 2013-2016 Ebola outbreak in Makeni among Ebola survivors (N = 68) and 81 Health care workers from Holy Spirit hospital and Loreto clinic, two health care facilities in Makeni district. Serological markers of HBV (HBs Ag, anti-HBs Ab and anti-HBc Ab) and anti-HCV antibodies detection were done using ELISA techniques. The positive detection rates for HBs Ag, anti-HBs Ab and anti-HBc antibodies in Ebola survivors were 23.53% (16/68), 32.35% (22/68) and 88.89% (16/18) respectively. Survivors with a current HBV infection had a positive rate of 38.89% (7/18) and 16.66% (3/18) of them were considered immune due to past HBV infection. HCV prevalence was 26.47% (18/68) and about 10.29% (7/68) were HBV/HCV co-infected. The positive detection rates of HBsAg, anti-HBs Ab and anti-HBc Ab were 37.07% (30/81), 33.33% (27/81) and 30.86% (25/81) respectively in health care workers. We observed that 4.94% (4/81) of the HCWs were currently infected with HBV. Participants considered as immune due to past infection represented 23.47% (19/81) and those immune due to vaccination represented 2.47% (2/81). The prevalence of HCV infection among health staff was 2.47% (2/81) with 1.23% (1/81) being HBV/HCV co-infection. Our findings showed that viral hepatitis infection is a burden for Sierra Leone government. There is an urgent need to develop and implement strategies that could improve population immunization against HBV and vulgarization of HCV treatment programs.
文摘<b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Background and Purpose: </span></b><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Klebsiella</span></i><span style="font-family:""><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> species are amongst the most common causes of a variety of community-acquired and hospital-acquired infections (HAI), characterized by high morbidity and mortality rates. Most infections caused by </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Klebsiella</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> species are usually treated using antibiotics. The aim of this study was to determine the antimicrobial resistance profile of </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Klebsiella</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> species isolated from in-patients and out-patients at the Yaounde University Teaching Hospital. The data generated will go a long way to improve on the choice of an adequate empiric antibiotic treatment for infections caused by </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Klebsiella</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> species. </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Methodology: </span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">A cross</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-</span><span style="font-family:""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">sectional descriptive study was carried out over a period of 6 months, spanning from February 2019 to July 2019 with a sample size of 37 isolates, obtained from 6 different clinical specimens. Identification of isolates was done using API 20E identification system (Bio</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">merieux SA, Lyon, France). Susceptibility to antibiotics was tested as de</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">scribed by Kirby-Bauer in 1956. Inhibition diameters were interpreted according to recommendations from the European Committee on Antimicrobial Suscepti</span><span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">bility Testing (EUCAST, 2019). </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Results and Conclusion: </span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Among the 37</span></span> <i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Klebsiella</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> isolates identified, </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Klebsiella pneumoniae</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> was the most prevalent species isolated with a percentage of 54.1%, followed by </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Klebsiella rhinoscleromatis</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> 18.9%, </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Klebsiella ozaenae </span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">16.2% and </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Klebsiella oxytoca</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">, 10.8%. The resistance pattern of </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Klebsiella</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> to amoxicillin, amoxicillin/clavulanate, tircacillin, tircacillin + clavulanic acid, piperacillin, piperacillin + tazobactam, cefalotin, cefuroxim, ceftazidime, cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, cefepime, imipenem, meropenem, aztreonam, amikacin, gentamicin, tobramycin, trimethoprim/</span></span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">sulfamethoxazole, nalidixic acid, pipemidic acid, norfloxacin, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, ofloxacin, and moxifoxacin was as follows;100%, 86.5%, 97.3%, 83.6%, 86.5%, 16.2%, 86.5%, 83.8%, 78.4%, 32.4%, 78.4%, 76.7%, 2.7%, 2.7%,</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">76.7%,</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">13.5%,</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">75.7%,</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">73.0%, 91.9%, 51.4%, 48.6%, 64.9%, 48.6%, 48.6%, 73.0% and </span><span style="font-family:""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">62.2% respectively. Multidrug resistance was observed in 94.6% of the </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Klebsiella</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> isolates. </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Conclusion: </span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">This study shows that the level of multidrug resistance is high. The isolates expressed good sensitivity to carbapenems, piperacillin + tazobactam, amikacin and high resistance to all other antimicrobials tested. Therefore, antimicrobial susceptibility test</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">ing prior to prescriptions should be encouraged and sensitization of the population about consequences of inappropriate antibiotic treatment and auto medication should be enforced as a mean</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">s</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> to curb antimicrobial resistance</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">.