Objective: To re-evaluate the systematic review of Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatmentwith total glucosides of paeony (TGP) to provide evidence-based evidence for the treatmentof RA with TGP in the clinic. Methods: A ...Objective: To re-evaluate the systematic review of Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatmentwith total glucosides of paeony (TGP) to provide evidence-based evidence for the treatmentof RA with TGP in the clinic. Methods: A total of eight databases including CNKI, Wan FangData, CBM, VIP, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched bycomputer for the systematic reviews/meta-analyses concerning the treatment of RA withTGP. The retrieval period was from the establishment of the database to May 2, 2022.Literature screening was conducted based on the randomized controlled trial, and thematerials of the included literature were extracted. Using the preferred reporting items forsystematic reviews and meta-analyses statement. The a measurement tool to assesssystematic reviews 2 scale and grades of recommendation, assessment, development, andevaluation system evaluated the reporting quality, methodological quality, and outcomeindicators evidence levels included in the literature. Results: Six systematicreviews/meta-analysis literature were finally included. Evaluation of the preferred reportingitems for systematic reviews and meta-analyses statement showed that the overall reportingquality of included literature was low, and only one piece with high quality was included.The results of the a measurement tool to assess systematic reviews 2 scale evaluationshowed that the qualities of included literature were all low-level and highly low-level. Thegrades of recommendation, assessment, development, and evaluation evidence qualityevaluation showed a total of 39 outcome indicators in the six included literature, and alloutcome indicators were intermediate, low-level, and extremely low in evidence evaluation.Conclusion: Many pieces of evidence show that TGP has certain advantages in alleviatingclinical symptoms, reducing adverse reactions, and reducing hepatotoxicity in the treatmentof RA, but this conclusion lacks high-level evidence to support it, which needs to be provedby more studies in the future.展开更多
基金National Natural Science Foundation of China(NO.81804050)Henan province traditional Chinese medicine scientific research special major subject(NO.20-21ZYZD05)Henan province traditional Chinese medicine scientific research special general subject(NO.2022ZY1062).
文摘Objective: To re-evaluate the systematic review of Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatmentwith total glucosides of paeony (TGP) to provide evidence-based evidence for the treatmentof RA with TGP in the clinic. Methods: A total of eight databases including CNKI, Wan FangData, CBM, VIP, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched bycomputer for the systematic reviews/meta-analyses concerning the treatment of RA withTGP. The retrieval period was from the establishment of the database to May 2, 2022.Literature screening was conducted based on the randomized controlled trial, and thematerials of the included literature were extracted. Using the preferred reporting items forsystematic reviews and meta-analyses statement. The a measurement tool to assesssystematic reviews 2 scale and grades of recommendation, assessment, development, andevaluation system evaluated the reporting quality, methodological quality, and outcomeindicators evidence levels included in the literature. Results: Six systematicreviews/meta-analysis literature were finally included. Evaluation of the preferred reportingitems for systematic reviews and meta-analyses statement showed that the overall reportingquality of included literature was low, and only one piece with high quality was included.The results of the a measurement tool to assess systematic reviews 2 scale evaluationshowed that the qualities of included literature were all low-level and highly low-level. Thegrades of recommendation, assessment, development, and evaluation evidence qualityevaluation showed a total of 39 outcome indicators in the six included literature, and alloutcome indicators were intermediate, low-level, and extremely low in evidence evaluation.Conclusion: Many pieces of evidence show that TGP has certain advantages in alleviatingclinical symptoms, reducing adverse reactions, and reducing hepatotoxicity in the treatmentof RA, but this conclusion lacks high-level evidence to support it, which needs to be provedby more studies in the future.
