Background:High liver fat content(LFC)induces increased risks of both hepatic and extrahepatic progression in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease(MASLD),while maintaining a significant decline in ...Background:High liver fat content(LFC)induces increased risks of both hepatic and extrahepatic progression in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease(MASLD),while maintaining a significant decline in magnetic resonance imaging-based proton density fat fraction(MRI-PDFF)(≥30%decline relative to baseline)without worsening fibrosis results in improved histological severity and prognosis.However,the factors associated with the loss of sustained responses to treatment remain unclear,and we aim to identify them.Methods:Consecutive treatment-naïve MASLD patients between January 2015 and February 2022,with follow-up until April 2023,were included in this prospective cohort study.LFC quantified by MRI-PDFF and liver stiffness measurements(LSM)determined by two-dimensional shear wave elastography(2D-SWE)were evaluated at weeks 0,24 and 48.MRI-PDFF response was defined as a≥30%relative decline in PDFF values,and LSM response was defined as a≥1 stage decline from baseline.Results:A total of 602 MASLD patients were enrolled.Of the 303 patients with a 24-week MRI-PDFF response and complete follow-up of 48 weeks,the rate of loss of MRI-PDFF response was 29.4%,and multivariable logistic regression analyses showed that 24-week insulin resistance(IR),still regular exercise and caloric restriction after 24 weeks,and the relative decline in LFC were risk factors for loss of MRI-PDFF response.Loss of LSM response at 48 weeks occurred in 15.9%of patients,and multivariable analysis confirmed 24-week serum total bile acid(TBA)levels and the relative decline in TBA from baseline as independent predictors.No significant association was found at 48 weeks between loss of MRI-PDFF response and loss of LSM response.Conclusions:MASLD patients with IR and high TBA levels are at higher risks of subsequent diminished sustained improvements of steatosis and fibrosis,respectively.展开更多
Background and Aims:The redefinition of metabolic-as-sociated fatty liver disease(MAFLD)from nonalcoholic fat-ty liver disease(NAFLD)has caused a revolution in clinical practice,and the characteristics of patients wit...Background and Aims:The redefinition of metabolic-as-sociated fatty liver disease(MAFLD)from nonalcoholic fat-ty liver disease(NAFLD)has caused a revolution in clinical practice,and the characteristics of patients with steatosis but not MAFLD remain unclear.The aims were to compare the diagnosis rate of MAFLD in NAFLD using different steato-sis methods and explore the features of non-MAFLD-NAFLD and MAFLD-non-NAFLD.Methods:A cross-sectional study enrolling consecutive individuals was conducted at three medical centers in southern China from January 2015 to September 2020.Steatosis was evaluated by liver biopsy or magnetic resonance imaging-based proton density fat frac-tion(MRI-PDFF),ultrasound,controlled attenuation param-eter(CAP),and fatty liver index(FLI).Fibrosis was assessed by the NAFLD fibrosis score,transient elastography,or shear wave elastography.Results:The study enrolled 14,985 Chi-nese adults.The agreement of MAFLD and NAFLD diagnoses were 83%for FLI,95%for ultrasound,94%for both CAP and MRI-PDFF,and 95%for liver biopsy.The body mass index,blood pressure and lipid levels among non-MAFLD-NAFLD pa-tients were similar metabolic parameters(p>0.05 for all),but not the alanine aminotransferase and the proportion of pa-tients with insulin resistance,which were significantly higher in non-MAFLD-NAFLD with significant fibrosis.Conclusions:The new MAFLD definition ruled out 5-17%of NAFLD cases.NAFLD and MAFLD-NAFLD involved more severe metabolic abnormalities than MAFLD and MAFLD-non-NAFLD.Non-MAFLD-NAFLD patients with significant fibrosis had more se-vere liver injury and increased glycemic dysregulation within the normal range.Attention should be paid to its progression.展开更多
基金National Natural Science Foundation of China(grant Nos.81870404 and 82100648)Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province,China(grant Nos.2021A1515011442 and 2022A1515012369)China Postdoctoral Science Foundation(grant No.2020M683128).
文摘Background:High liver fat content(LFC)induces increased risks of both hepatic and extrahepatic progression in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease(MASLD),while maintaining a significant decline in magnetic resonance imaging-based proton density fat fraction(MRI-PDFF)(≥30%decline relative to baseline)without worsening fibrosis results in improved histological severity and prognosis.However,the factors associated with the loss of sustained responses to treatment remain unclear,and we aim to identify them.Methods:Consecutive treatment-naïve MASLD patients between January 2015 and February 2022,with follow-up until April 2023,were included in this prospective cohort study.LFC quantified by MRI-PDFF and liver stiffness measurements(LSM)determined by two-dimensional shear wave elastography(2D-SWE)were evaluated at weeks 0,24 and 48.MRI-PDFF response was defined as a≥30%relative decline in PDFF values,and LSM response was defined as a≥1 stage decline from baseline.Results:A total of 602 MASLD patients were enrolled.Of the 303 patients with a 24-week MRI-PDFF response and complete follow-up of 48 weeks,the rate of loss of MRI-PDFF response was 29.4%,and multivariable logistic regression analyses showed that 24-week insulin resistance(IR),still regular exercise and caloric restriction after 24 weeks,and the relative decline in LFC were risk factors for loss of MRI-PDFF response.Loss of LSM response at 48 weeks occurred in 15.9%of patients,and multivariable analysis confirmed 24-week serum total bile acid(TBA)levels and the relative decline in TBA from baseline as independent predictors.No significant association was found at 48 weeks between loss of MRI-PDFF response and loss of LSM response.Conclusions:MASLD patients with IR and high TBA levels are at higher risks of subsequent diminished sustained improvements of steatosis and fibrosis,respectively.
基金National Natural Science Foundation of China(81870404,81670518,81170392)Guangdong Science and Technology Department(2014A020212118)+1 种基金Chinese Foundation for Hepatitis Prevention and Control(TQGB20140083)China postdoctoral science foundation(2020M683128).
文摘Background and Aims:The redefinition of metabolic-as-sociated fatty liver disease(MAFLD)from nonalcoholic fat-ty liver disease(NAFLD)has caused a revolution in clinical practice,and the characteristics of patients with steatosis but not MAFLD remain unclear.The aims were to compare the diagnosis rate of MAFLD in NAFLD using different steato-sis methods and explore the features of non-MAFLD-NAFLD and MAFLD-non-NAFLD.Methods:A cross-sectional study enrolling consecutive individuals was conducted at three medical centers in southern China from January 2015 to September 2020.Steatosis was evaluated by liver biopsy or magnetic resonance imaging-based proton density fat frac-tion(MRI-PDFF),ultrasound,controlled attenuation param-eter(CAP),and fatty liver index(FLI).Fibrosis was assessed by the NAFLD fibrosis score,transient elastography,or shear wave elastography.Results:The study enrolled 14,985 Chi-nese adults.The agreement of MAFLD and NAFLD diagnoses were 83%for FLI,95%for ultrasound,94%for both CAP and MRI-PDFF,and 95%for liver biopsy.The body mass index,blood pressure and lipid levels among non-MAFLD-NAFLD pa-tients were similar metabolic parameters(p>0.05 for all),but not the alanine aminotransferase and the proportion of pa-tients with insulin resistance,which were significantly higher in non-MAFLD-NAFLD with significant fibrosis.Conclusions:The new MAFLD definition ruled out 5-17%of NAFLD cases.NAFLD and MAFLD-NAFLD involved more severe metabolic abnormalities than MAFLD and MAFLD-non-NAFLD.Non-MAFLD-NAFLD patients with significant fibrosis had more se-vere liver injury and increased glycemic dysregulation within the normal range.Attention should be paid to its progression.