期刊文献+
共找到3篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
亚太地区炎症性肠病处理共识意见(二) 被引量:47
1
作者 欧阳钦 Rakesh Tandon +9 位作者 KL Goh 潘国宗 km fock Claudio Fiocchi SK Lam 萧树东 张虎(翻译) 梁红亮(翻译) 王玉芳(翻译) 欧阳钦(审校) 《胃肠病学》 2006年第5期301-305,共5页
关键词 亚太地区 共识意见 炎症性肠病 Medline检索 治疗手段 研究文献 IBD 临床治疗 实践经验 专家经验
下载PDF
亚太地区炎症性肠病处理共识意见(一) 被引量:123
2
作者 欧阳钦 Rakesh Tandon +8 位作者 KL Goh 潘国宗 km fock Claudio Fiocchi SK Lam 萧树东 张虎 梁红亮 王玉芳 《胃肠病学》 2006年第4期233-238,共6页
虽然目前亚太地区尚无炎症性肠病(IBD)的大规模流行病学资料,但一系列研究显示其发病率和患病率呈上升趋势,与西方国家相比仍呈滞后现象,溃疡性结肠炎(UC)的发病率仍较克罗恩病(CD)高。除地域差异外,在一些多民族国家中,IBD尚可见种族... 虽然目前亚太地区尚无炎症性肠病(IBD)的大规模流行病学资料,但一系列研究显示其发病率和患病率呈上升趋势,与西方国家相比仍呈滞后现象,溃疡性结肠炎(UC)的发病率仍较克罗恩病(CD)高。除地域差异外,在一些多民族国家中,IBD尚可见种族差异。亚太地区IBD的遗传背景有异于西方国家,如据报道该地区CD患者未检出NOD2/CARD15变异。一般而言,该地区IBD患者的临床过程似不如西方国家严重。亚太地区IBD的诊断存在一些特殊问题。如缺乏IBD诊断金标准,存在多种小肠结肠炎,与IBD临床表现相似,使鉴别诊断特别困难。迄今为止,亚太地区IBD的诊断标准多采用西方国家的诊断标准。诊断必须逐步排除非IBD的小肠结肠炎,确诊应有典型的组织学表现,某些患者需借助随访和诊断性治疗才能确诊。进一步研究IBD发病机制将有助于开发更好的诊断标记物。亚太地区IBD的治疗亦存在特殊问题。由于诊断困难,IBD患者常未能及时接受适当的药物治疗,但该地区仍广泛采用药物治疗方案。结合西方指南和本地经验可制定类似的处理原则,以利诱导缓解和维持缓解。提倡逐级使用基于病变范围、活动性和严重度的阶梯式治疗方案,对不同病例采用综合性、个体化的方法。随着对IBD发病机制和亚太地区IBD独特性的深入理解,合理、实用的药物治疗指南和应用生物制剂治疗将改善该地区IBD的治疗前景。 展开更多
关键词 亚太地区 炎症性肠病 共识意见 药物治疗方案 诊断金标准 诊断性治疗 阶梯式治疗方案 西方国家 小肠结肠炎 流行病学资料
下载PDF
Rabeprazole vs esomeprazole in non-erosive gastro-esophageal reflux disease: A randomized, double-blind study in urban Asia 被引量:8
3
作者 km fock EK Teo +3 位作者 TL Ang TS Chua TM Ng YL Tan 《World Journal of Gastroenterology》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2005年第20期3091-3098,共8页
AIM:Gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) is becoming increasingly common in Asia. Data on the efficacy of proton pump inhibitors in patients with non-erosive GERD (NERD)in Asia is lacking. This double-blind study ... AIM:Gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) is becoming increasingly common in Asia. Data on the efficacy of proton pump inhibitors in patients with non-erosive GERD (NERD)in Asia is lacking. This double-blind study compared the efficacy and safety of rabeprazole with esomeprazole in relief of symptoms in patients with NERD.METHODS: One hundred and thirty-four patients with reflux symptoms of NERD and normal endoscopy were randomized to receive rabeprazole 10 mg or esomeprazole 20 mg once daily for 4 wk. Symptoms were recorded in a diary and changes in severity of symptoms noted.RESULTS: At 4 wk of treatment, rabeprazole 10 mg and esomeprazole 20 mg were comparable with regards to the primary endpoint of time to achieve 24-h symptomfree interval for heartburn 8.5 d vs9 d and regurgitation 6 d vs 7.5 d. Rabeprazole and esomeprazole were also similarly efficacious in term of patient's global evaluation with 96% of patients on rabeprazole and 87.9% of patients on esomeprazole, reporting that symptoms improved(P=NS). Satisfactory relief of day- and night-time symptoms was achieved in 98% of patients receiving rabeprazole and 81.4% of patients receiving esomeprazole. Adverse events were comparable in both groups (P = NS).CONCLUSION: Rabeprazole 10 mg has a similar efficacy and safety profile in Asians with NERD as esomeprazole 20 mg. Further study is necessary to investigate whether the small differences between the two drugs seen in this study are related to the improved pharmacodynamicpro perties of rabeprazole. Both drugs were well tolerated. 展开更多
关键词 Non-erosive esophageal reflux disease New proton pump inhibitors
下载PDF
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部