Spatial relation extraction is the process of identifying geographic entities from text and determining their corresponding spatial relations.Traditional spatial relation extraction mainly uses rule-based pattern matc...Spatial relation extraction is the process of identifying geographic entities from text and determining their corresponding spatial relations.Traditional spatial relation extraction mainly uses rule-based pattern matching,supervised learning-based or unsupervised learning-based methods.However,these methods suffer from poor time-sensitive,high labor cost and high dependence on large-scale data.With the development of pre-trained language models greatly alleviating the shortcomings of traditional methods,supervised learning methods incorporating pre-trained language models have become the mainstream relation extraction methods.Pipeline extraction and joint extraction,as the two most dominant ideas of relation extraction,both have obtained good performance on different datasets,and whether to share the contextual information of entities and relations is the main differences between the two ideas.In this paper,we compare the performance of two ideas oriented to spatial relation extraction based on Chinese corpus data in the field of geography and verify which method based on pre-trained language models is more suitable for Chinese spatial relation extraction.We fine-tuned the hyperparameters of the two models to optimize the extraction accuracy before the comparison experiments.The results of the comparison experiments show that pipeline extraction performs better than joint extraction of spatial relation extraction for Chinese text data with sentence granularity,because different tasks have different focus on contextual information,and it is difficult to take account into the needs of both tasks by sharing contextual information.In addition,we further compare the performance of the two models with the rule-based template approach in extracting topological,directional and distance relations,summarize the shortcomings of this experiment and provide an outlook for future work.展开更多
基金supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China under[Grant number 2021YFB3900903]the National Natural Science Foundation of China under[Grant number 41971337].
文摘Spatial relation extraction is the process of identifying geographic entities from text and determining their corresponding spatial relations.Traditional spatial relation extraction mainly uses rule-based pattern matching,supervised learning-based or unsupervised learning-based methods.However,these methods suffer from poor time-sensitive,high labor cost and high dependence on large-scale data.With the development of pre-trained language models greatly alleviating the shortcomings of traditional methods,supervised learning methods incorporating pre-trained language models have become the mainstream relation extraction methods.Pipeline extraction and joint extraction,as the two most dominant ideas of relation extraction,both have obtained good performance on different datasets,and whether to share the contextual information of entities and relations is the main differences between the two ideas.In this paper,we compare the performance of two ideas oriented to spatial relation extraction based on Chinese corpus data in the field of geography and verify which method based on pre-trained language models is more suitable for Chinese spatial relation extraction.We fine-tuned the hyperparameters of the two models to optimize the extraction accuracy before the comparison experiments.The results of the comparison experiments show that pipeline extraction performs better than joint extraction of spatial relation extraction for Chinese text data with sentence granularity,because different tasks have different focus on contextual information,and it is difficult to take account into the needs of both tasks by sharing contextual information.In addition,we further compare the performance of the two models with the rule-based template approach in extracting topological,directional and distance relations,summarize the shortcomings of this experiment and provide an outlook for future work.
