Background:The threat of a rapidly changing planet-of coupled social,environmental and climatic change-pose new conceptual and practical challenges in responding to vector-borne diseases.These include non-linear and u...Background:The threat of a rapidly changing planet-of coupled social,environmental and climatic change-pose new conceptual and practical challenges in responding to vector-borne diseases.These include non-linear and uncertain spatial-temporal change dynamics associated with climate,animals,land,water,food,settlement,conflict,ecology and human socio-cultural,economic and political-institutional systems.To date,research efforts have been dominated by disease modeling,which has provided limited practical advice to policymakers and practitioners in developing policies and programmes on the ground.Main body:In this paper,we provide an alternative biosocial perspective grounded in social science insights,drawing upon concepts of vulnerability,resilience,participation and community-based adaptation.Our analysis was informed by a realist review(provided in the Additional file 2)focused on seven major climate-sensitive vectorborne diseases:malaria,schistosomiasis,dengue,leishmaniasis,sleeping sickness,chagas disease,and rift valley fever.Here,we situate our analysis of existing community-based interventions within the context of global change processes and the wider social science literature.We identify and discuss best practices and conceptual principles that should guide future community-based efforts to mitigate human vulnerability to vector-borne diseases.We argue that more focused attention and investments are needed in meaningful public participation,appropriate technologies,the strengthening of health systems,sustainable development,wider institutional changes and attention to the social determinants of health,including the drivers of co-infection.Conclusion:In order to respond effectively to uncertain future scenarios for vector-borne disease in a changing world,more attention needs to be given to building resilient and equitable systems in the present.展开更多
Background:Previously free of rabies,Bali experienced an outbreak in 2008,which has since caused a large number of human fatalities.In response,both mass dog culling and vaccination have been implemented.In order to a...Background:Previously free of rabies,Bali experienced an outbreak in 2008,which has since caused a large number of human fatalities.In response,both mass dog culling and vaccination have been implemented.In order to assess potential community-driven interventions for optimizing rabies control,we conducted a study exploring the relationship between dogs,rabies,and the Balinese community.The objectives of this study were to:i)understand the human-dog relationship in Bali;ii)explore local knowledge,attitudes,and practices(KAPs)relating to rabies;and iii)assess potential community-driven activities to optimize rabies control and surveillance.Methods:Conducted between February and June 2011,the study combined a questionnaire(n=300;CI=95%;error margin=5%)and focus group discussions(FGDs)in 10 villages in the Denpasar,Gianyar,and Karangasem regencies.The questionnaire included a Likert scale to assess community knowledge and attitudes.For the knowledge assessment,three points were given for a correct answer,while wrong answers and uncertain answers were given zero points.For the attitudes assessment,three points were given for a positive answer,two points for a neutral answer,and one point for a negative answer.Respondent knowledge was categorized as good(score>40),fair(score 20–40),or poor(score<20),based on a maximum total score 60.Respondent attitudes were categorized as positive(score>26),neutral(score 13–26),or negative(score<13),based on a maximum total score of 39.Mixed-gender FGDs in each sub-village(banjar)were conducted,each involving 7–15 participants to complement the questionnaire results.On a follow-up research trip in mid-2013,the data analysis was triangulated and validated using semi-structured interviews.Questionnaire data were analyzed descriptively using SPSS 17.0,while qualitative data from interviews and FGDs were analyzed manually according to accepted methods of coding and memo writing.The chi-square test was then used to analyze the statistical relationships between knowledge and attitudes of the respondents.Results:Out of the total 300 respondents,most were predominantly male(82%),Hindu(99%),married(96%),older than 30 years of age(92%),and owned dogs(72%6).Dog ownership was motivated by culture,personal taste,and function,with dogs was being used as guards(85%)and companion animals(27%),and was sometimes related to religious or traditional obligations(2%).Relating to their culture and local beliefs,and eventually becoming their way of life,79%of respondents kept free-roaming dogs.with the rabies outbreak in Bali and Westerm breeds becoming more popular,more responsible dog ownership(leashing,confining,regular feeding)became more acceptable and changed community perceptions on keeping dogs,even though the sustainability of this practice cannot be gauged.In addition,the economic situation posed major problems in rural areas.The level of community knowledge about rabies and its associated control programs were generally fair and community attitudes were positive.However,community KAPs still need to be improved.A total of 74%respondents reported to have vaccinated their dogs in 2011,but only few were found to report rabid animals to livestock officers(12%)and a significant number believed that washing a bite wound was not important(62%).Moreover,free-roaming dog practices and discarding of unwanted female puppies still continue and possibly create difficulties for rabies elimination as these practices potentially increase the stray dog population.We identified three major sociocultural aspects with potential for community-driven interventions to optimize current rabies elimination efforts:integrating local notions of ahimsa(non-violence)into education campaigns,engaging communities through the local banjar sociopolitical system,and working with traditional legal structures to increase local compliance with rabies control.Conclusion:The human-dog relationship in Bali is multifaceted.Due to the uniqueness of the culture and the local beliefs,and encouraged by a socioeconomic aspect,a number of local practices were found to be constituting risk factors for continued rabies spread.Community knowledge and attitudes,which can consequently result in behavioral changes,needs to be improved across different genders,ages educational backgrounds,and roles in the commurnity,regardless of the individual village's experiences with rabies.Furthermore,community-driven activities based on sociocultural conditioning and community capacity at the banjar and village levels,such as public awareness activities,vaccination,dog registration,dog population management,and rapid response to dog bites,were identified as being able to complement the rabies control program in Bali.The program also needs recognition or acknowledgement from governments,especially local govemment as well as regular mentoring to improve and sustain community participation.展开更多
Correction After publication of this article[1]it came to our attention that the name of the author Sadie Ryan was incorrectly shown.Her correct name is Sadie J.Ryan.The original article has been updated to reflect th...Correction After publication of this article[1]it came to our attention that the name of the author Sadie Ryan was incorrectly shown.Her correct name is Sadie J.Ryan.The original article has been updated to reflect this change.展开更多
基金Funding for this paper was provided by the Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases(TDR)through the International Development Research Centre(IDRC)Additional support was provided by a Wellcome Trust Society and Ethics Fellowship to KLB.These funding bodies did not contribute to the design of the study,the collection,analysis and interpretation of data or the writing of the manuscript.
文摘Background:The threat of a rapidly changing planet-of coupled social,environmental and climatic change-pose new conceptual and practical challenges in responding to vector-borne diseases.These include non-linear and uncertain spatial-temporal change dynamics associated with climate,animals,land,water,food,settlement,conflict,ecology and human socio-cultural,economic and political-institutional systems.To date,research efforts have been dominated by disease modeling,which has provided limited practical advice to policymakers and practitioners in developing policies and programmes on the ground.Main body:In this paper,we provide an alternative biosocial perspective grounded in social science insights,drawing upon concepts of vulnerability,resilience,participation and community-based adaptation.Our analysis was informed by a realist review(provided in the Additional file 2)focused on seven major climate-sensitive vectorborne diseases:malaria,schistosomiasis,dengue,leishmaniasis,sleeping sickness,chagas disease,and rift valley fever.Here,we situate our analysis of existing community-based interventions within the context of global change processes and the wider social science literature.We identify and discuss best practices and conceptual principles that should guide future community-based efforts to mitigate human vulnerability to vector-borne diseases.We argue that more focused attention and investments are needed in meaningful public participation,appropriate technologies,the strengthening of health systems,sustainable development,wider institutional changes and attention to the social determinants of health,including the drivers of co-infection.Conclusion:In order to respond effectively to uncertain future scenarios for vector-borne disease in a changing world,more attention needs to be given to building resilient and equitable systems in the present.
基金We would like to thank the International Livestock Research Institute(ILRI)that led this project and the International Development Research Center(IDRC)for their financial support.Our gratitude also extends to the Livestock and Animal Health Services Office of the Bali province,the Livestock Services Office of Denpasar city,the Livestock,Fisheries and Marine Services Offices of the Gianyar District,the Livestock,Marine and Fisheries Services Offices of the Karangasem district,local governments,traditional leaders,and community members in villages who supported our activities in the field.We also thank the research and field teams involved in this study.
文摘Background:Previously free of rabies,Bali experienced an outbreak in 2008,which has since caused a large number of human fatalities.In response,both mass dog culling and vaccination have been implemented.In order to assess potential community-driven interventions for optimizing rabies control,we conducted a study exploring the relationship between dogs,rabies,and the Balinese community.The objectives of this study were to:i)understand the human-dog relationship in Bali;ii)explore local knowledge,attitudes,and practices(KAPs)relating to rabies;and iii)assess potential community-driven activities to optimize rabies control and surveillance.Methods:Conducted between February and June 2011,the study combined a questionnaire(n=300;CI=95%;error margin=5%)and focus group discussions(FGDs)in 10 villages in the Denpasar,Gianyar,and Karangasem regencies.The questionnaire included a Likert scale to assess community knowledge and attitudes.For the knowledge assessment,three points were given for a correct answer,while wrong answers and uncertain answers were given zero points.For the attitudes assessment,three points were given for a positive answer,two points for a neutral answer,and one point for a negative answer.Respondent knowledge was categorized as good(score>40),fair(score 20–40),or poor(score<20),based on a maximum total score 60.Respondent attitudes were categorized as positive(score>26),neutral(score 13–26),or negative(score<13),based on a maximum total score of 39.Mixed-gender FGDs in each sub-village(banjar)were conducted,each involving 7–15 participants to complement the questionnaire results.On a follow-up research trip in mid-2013,the data analysis was triangulated and validated using semi-structured interviews.Questionnaire data were analyzed descriptively using SPSS 17.0,while qualitative data from interviews and FGDs were analyzed manually according to accepted methods of coding and memo writing.The chi-square test was then used to analyze the statistical relationships between knowledge and attitudes of the respondents.Results:Out of the total 300 respondents,most were predominantly male(82%),Hindu(99%),married(96%),older than 30 years of age(92%),and owned dogs(72%6).Dog ownership was motivated by culture,personal taste,and function,with dogs was being used as guards(85%)and companion animals(27%),and was sometimes related to religious or traditional obligations(2%).Relating to their culture and local beliefs,and eventually becoming their way of life,79%of respondents kept free-roaming dogs.with the rabies outbreak in Bali and Westerm breeds becoming more popular,more responsible dog ownership(leashing,confining,regular feeding)became more acceptable and changed community perceptions on keeping dogs,even though the sustainability of this practice cannot be gauged.In addition,the economic situation posed major problems in rural areas.The level of community knowledge about rabies and its associated control programs were generally fair and community attitudes were positive.However,community KAPs still need to be improved.A total of 74%respondents reported to have vaccinated their dogs in 2011,but only few were found to report rabid animals to livestock officers(12%)and a significant number believed that washing a bite wound was not important(62%).Moreover,free-roaming dog practices and discarding of unwanted female puppies still continue and possibly create difficulties for rabies elimination as these practices potentially increase the stray dog population.We identified three major sociocultural aspects with potential for community-driven interventions to optimize current rabies elimination efforts:integrating local notions of ahimsa(non-violence)into education campaigns,engaging communities through the local banjar sociopolitical system,and working with traditional legal structures to increase local compliance with rabies control.Conclusion:The human-dog relationship in Bali is multifaceted.Due to the uniqueness of the culture and the local beliefs,and encouraged by a socioeconomic aspect,a number of local practices were found to be constituting risk factors for continued rabies spread.Community knowledge and attitudes,which can consequently result in behavioral changes,needs to be improved across different genders,ages educational backgrounds,and roles in the commurnity,regardless of the individual village's experiences with rabies.Furthermore,community-driven activities based on sociocultural conditioning and community capacity at the banjar and village levels,such as public awareness activities,vaccination,dog registration,dog population management,and rapid response to dog bites,were identified as being able to complement the rabies control program in Bali.The program also needs recognition or acknowledgement from governments,especially local govemment as well as regular mentoring to improve and sustain community participation.
文摘Correction After publication of this article[1]it came to our attention that the name of the author Sadie Ryan was incorrectly shown.Her correct name is Sadie J.Ryan.The original article has been updated to reflect this change.