Background:Starting in December 2013,the Ebola virus disease(EVD)epidemic spread in West Africa through five countries(Sierra Leone,Liberia,Guinea,Nigeria,and Mali),killing over 11,300 people.In partnership with C...Background:Starting in December 2013,the Ebola virus disease(EVD)epidemic spread in West Africa through five countries(Sierra Leone,Liberia,Guinea,Nigeria,and Mali),killing over 11,300 people.In partnership with Côte d’Ivoire’s Ministry of Health,the International Rescue Committee instigated a community-led strategy aimed at promoting behavior change in order to prevent potential Ebola outbreaks in the country.The strategy was implemented in Western districts bordering Liberia,Guinea,and Mali.This study aims to analyze the community-led strategy,to document lessons learned from the experience,and to capitalize on the achievements.Methods:A case study in four districts of Western Côte d’Ivoire,i.e.Biankouma,Danané,Odiennéand Touba districts was carried out.Qualitative data in 12 villages(i.e.,three villages per district)was collected from 62 healthcare workers,community leaders,and ordinary community members.Data was de-identified,coded and analyzed using a thematic approach.Results:The community-led strategy was socially accepted in the villages.Even though some community leaders reported that sensitization had been,at times,constrained by a lack of equipment,the people interviewed demonstrated accurate understanding of information about prevention practices.Some practices were easily adopted,while others remained difficult to implement(e.g.,ensuring safe and dignified dead body management).Conclusion:This research demonstrates that sensitization efforts led by well-integrated and respected community leaders can be conducive of behavior change.Lessons learned from the community-led strategy could be applied to future disease outbreaks.展开更多
Background:The rise on the international scene of advocacy for universal health coverage(UHC)was accompanied by the promotion of a variety of health financing policies.Major donors presented health insurance,user fee ...Background:The rise on the international scene of advocacy for universal health coverage(UHC)was accompanied by the promotion of a variety of health financing policies.Major donors presented health insurance,user fee exemption,and results-based financing policies as relevant instruments for achieving UHC in Sub-Saharan Africa.The“donor-driven”push for policies aiming at UHC raises concerns about governments’effective buy-in of such policies.Because the latter has implications on the success of such policies,we searched for evidence of government ownership of the policymaking process.Methods:We conducted a scoping review of the English and French literature from January 2001 to December 2015 on government ownership of decision-making on policies aiming at UHC in Sub-Saharan Africa.Thirty-five(35)results were retrieved.We extracted,synthesized and analyzed data in order to provide insights on ownership at five stages of the policymaking process:emergence,formulation,funding,implementation,and evaluation.Results:The majority of articles(24/35)showed mixed results(i.e.ownership was identified at one or more levels of policymaking process but not all)in terms of government ownership.Authors of only five papers provided evidence of ownership at all reviewed policymaking stages.When results demonstrated some lack of government ownership at any of the five stages,we noticed that donors did not necessarily play a role:other actors’involvement was contributing to undermining government-owned decision-making,such as the private sector.We also found evidence that both government ownership and donors’influence can successfully coexist.Discussion:Future research should look beyond indicators of government ownership,by analyzing historical factors behind the imbalance of power between the different actors during policy negotiations.There is a need to investigate how some national actors become policy champions and thereby influence policy formulation.In order to effectively achieve government ownership of financing policies aiming at UHC,we recommend strengthening the State’s coordination and domestic funding mobilization roles,together with securing a higher involvement of governmental(both political and technical)actors by donors.展开更多
文摘Background:Starting in December 2013,the Ebola virus disease(EVD)epidemic spread in West Africa through five countries(Sierra Leone,Liberia,Guinea,Nigeria,and Mali),killing over 11,300 people.In partnership with Côte d’Ivoire’s Ministry of Health,the International Rescue Committee instigated a community-led strategy aimed at promoting behavior change in order to prevent potential Ebola outbreaks in the country.The strategy was implemented in Western districts bordering Liberia,Guinea,and Mali.This study aims to analyze the community-led strategy,to document lessons learned from the experience,and to capitalize on the achievements.Methods:A case study in four districts of Western Côte d’Ivoire,i.e.Biankouma,Danané,Odiennéand Touba districts was carried out.Qualitative data in 12 villages(i.e.,three villages per district)was collected from 62 healthcare workers,community leaders,and ordinary community members.Data was de-identified,coded and analyzed using a thematic approach.Results:The community-led strategy was socially accepted in the villages.Even though some community leaders reported that sensitization had been,at times,constrained by a lack of equipment,the people interviewed demonstrated accurate understanding of information about prevention practices.Some practices were easily adopted,while others remained difficult to implement(e.g.,ensuring safe and dignified dead body management).Conclusion:This research demonstrates that sensitization efforts led by well-integrated and respected community leaders can be conducive of behavior change.Lessons learned from the community-led strategy could be applied to future disease outbreaks.
基金the REALISME Research Chair of the Canadian Institutes Health Research(CPP 137901)the School of Public Health of the University of Montreal for financial support during the year throughout which this research was undertaken+1 种基金Currently,LG receives a PhD scholarship from Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Sociétéet Culture(FRQSC)VR holds a CIHR-funded Research Chair in Applied Public Health(CPP 137901)。
文摘Background:The rise on the international scene of advocacy for universal health coverage(UHC)was accompanied by the promotion of a variety of health financing policies.Major donors presented health insurance,user fee exemption,and results-based financing policies as relevant instruments for achieving UHC in Sub-Saharan Africa.The“donor-driven”push for policies aiming at UHC raises concerns about governments’effective buy-in of such policies.Because the latter has implications on the success of such policies,we searched for evidence of government ownership of the policymaking process.Methods:We conducted a scoping review of the English and French literature from January 2001 to December 2015 on government ownership of decision-making on policies aiming at UHC in Sub-Saharan Africa.Thirty-five(35)results were retrieved.We extracted,synthesized and analyzed data in order to provide insights on ownership at five stages of the policymaking process:emergence,formulation,funding,implementation,and evaluation.Results:The majority of articles(24/35)showed mixed results(i.e.ownership was identified at one or more levels of policymaking process but not all)in terms of government ownership.Authors of only five papers provided evidence of ownership at all reviewed policymaking stages.When results demonstrated some lack of government ownership at any of the five stages,we noticed that donors did not necessarily play a role:other actors’involvement was contributing to undermining government-owned decision-making,such as the private sector.We also found evidence that both government ownership and donors’influence can successfully coexist.Discussion:Future research should look beyond indicators of government ownership,by analyzing historical factors behind the imbalance of power between the different actors during policy negotiations.There is a need to investigate how some national actors become policy champions and thereby influence policy formulation.In order to effectively achieve government ownership of financing policies aiming at UHC,we recommend strengthening the State’s coordination and domestic funding mobilization roles,together with securing a higher involvement of governmental(both political and technical)actors by donors.