Management of gastro-esophageal reflux disease:Practice-oriented answers to clinical questions

Gastro-esophageal reflux disease(GERD)is a condition which is frequently faced by primary care physicians and gastroenterologists.Improving management of GERD is crucial to maximise both patient care and resource utilization.In fact,the management of patients with GERD is complex and poses several questions to the clinician who faces them in clinical practice.For instance,many aspects should be considered,including the appropriateness of indication to endoscopy,the quality of the endoscopic examination,the use and interpretation of ambulatory reflux testing,and the choice and management of anti-reflux treatments,i.e.,protonpump inhibitors and surgery.Aim of the present review was to provide a comprehensive update on the clinical management of patients with GERD,through a literature review on the diagnosis and management of patients with GER symptoms.In details,we provide practice-oriented concise answers to clinical questions,with the aim of optimising patient management and healthcare resource use.

Laparoscopic fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a condition that develops when the reflux of gastric contents into the esophagus leads to troublesome symptoms and/or complications. Heartburn is the cardinal symptom, often associated with regurgitation. In patients with endoscopy-negative heartburn refractory to proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy and when the diagnosis of GERD is in question, direct reflux testing by impedance-pH monitoring is warranted. Laparoscopic fundoplication is the standard surgical treatment for GERD. It is highly effective in curing GERD with a 80% success rate at 20-year follow-up. The Nissen fundoplication, consisting of a total (360°) wrap, is the most commonly performed antireflux operation. To reduce postoperative dysphagia and gas bloating, partial fundoplications are also used, including the posterior (Toupet) fundoplication, and the anterior (Dor) fundoplication. Currently, there is consensus to advise laparoscopic fundoplication in PPI-responsive GERD only for those patients who develop untoward side-effects or complications from PPI therapy. PPI resistance is the real challenge in GERD. There is consensus that carefully selected GERD patients refractory to PPI therapy are eligible for laparoscopic fundoplication, provided that objective evidence of reflux as the cause of ongoing symptoms has been obtained. For this purpose, impedance-pH monitoring is regarded as the diagnostic gold standard.

Prevention of pelvic radiation disease

Pelvic cancers are among the most frequently diagnosed cancers worldwide. Treatment of patients requires a multidisciplinary approach that frequently includes radiotherapy. Gastrointestinal(GI) radiation-induced toxicity is a major complication and the transient or long-term problems, ranging from mild to very severe, arising in non-cancerous tissues resulting from radiation treatment to a tumor of pelvic origin, are actually called as pelvic radiation disease. The incidence of pelvic radiation disease changes according to the radiation technique, the length of follow up, the assessmentmethod, the type and stage of cancer and several other variables. Notably, even with the most recent radiation techniques, i.e., intensity-modulated radiotherapy, the incidence of radiation-induced GI side effects is overall reduced but still not negligible. In addition, radiation-induced GI side effects can develop even after several decades; therefore, the improvement of patient life expectancy will unavoidably increase the risk of developing radiation-induced complications. Once developed, the management of pelvic radiation disease may be challenging. Therefore, the prevention of radiation-induced toxicity represents a reasonable way to avoid a dramatic drop of the quality of life of these patients. In the current manuscript we provide an updated and practical review on the best available evidences in the field of the prevention of pelvic radiation disease.

Pelvic radiation disease:Updates on treatment options

Pelvic cancers are among the most frequently diagnosed neoplasms and radiotherapy represents one of the main treatment options. The irradiation field usually encompasses healthy intestinal tissue,especially of distal large bowel,thus inducing gastrointestinal(GI) radiation-induced toxicity. Indeed,up to half of radiationtreated patients say that their quality of life is affected by GI symptoms(e.g.,rectal bleeding,diarrhoea). The constellation of GI symptoms- from transient to longterm,from mild to very severe- experienced by patients who underwent radiation treatment for a pelvic tumor have been comprised in the definition of pelvic radiation disease(PRD). A correct and evidence-based therapeutic approach of patients experiencing GI radiation-induced toxicity is mandatory. Therapeutic non-surgical strategies for PRD can be summarized in two broad categories,i.e.,medical and endoscopic. Of note,most of the studies have investigated the management of radiation-induced rectal bleeding. Patients with clinically significant bleeding(i.e.,causing chronic anemia) should firstly be considered for medical management(i.e.,sucralfate enemas,metronidazole and hyperbaric oxygen); in case of failure,endoscopic treatment should be implemented. This latter should be considered the first choice in case of acute,transfusion requiring,bleeding. More well-performed,high quality studies should be performed,especially the role of medical treatments should be better investigated as well as the comparative studies between endoscopic and hyperbaric oxygen treatments.