Multi-factor analysis of initial poor graft function after orthotopic liver transplantation

BACKGROUND: In the early period of orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT), initial poor graft function (IPGF) is one of the complications which leads to primary graft non-function (PGNF) in serious cases. This study set out to establish the clinical risk factors resulting in IPGF after OLT. METHODS: Eighty cases of OLT were analyzed. The IPGF group consisted of patients with alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and/or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) above 1500 IU/L within 72 hours after OLT, while those in the non-IPGF group had values below 1500 IU/L. Recipient-associated factors before OLT analyzed were age, sex, primary liver disease and Child-Pugh classification; factors analyzed within the peri-operative period were non-heart beating time (NHBT), cold ischemia time (CIT), rewarming ischemic time (RWIT), liver biopsy at the end of cold ischemia; and factors analyzed within 72 hours after OLT were ALT and/or AST values. A logistic regression model was applied to filter the possible factors resulting in IPGF. RESULTS: Donor NHBT, CIT and RWIT were significantly longer in the IPGF group than in the non-IPGF group; in the logistic regression model, NHBT was the risk factor leading to IPGF (P<0.05), while CIT and RWIT were possible risk factors. In one case in the IPGF group, PGNF appeared with moderate hepatic steatosis. CONCLUSIONS: Longer NHBT is an important risk factor leading to IPGF, while serious steatosis in the donor liver, CIT and RWIT are potential risk factors.

Preliminary clinical experience in liver retransplantation

BACKGROUND: The past several decades have witnessed increasingly successful rates of liver transplantation. However, retransplantation remains the only choice for patients with irreversible graft failure after primary transplantation. This article aimed to summarize our clinical experience in liver retransplantation. METHODS: From June 2002 to December 2005, a total of 185 cases of liver transplantation including 8 cases of retransplantation were performed in our hospital. The clinical data were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: The rate of liver retransplantation was 4.32%. Retransplantation was indicated for the following reasons: biliary complication (3 cases), chronic rejection (2), hepatic artery thrombosis (1), uncontrollable acute rejection (1) and hepatitis B recurrence (1). The mean model of end-stage liver disease (MELD) scores before primary transplantation and retransplantation were 15.6 and 23.9, respectively (P<0.05). The MELD score reflected the severity of liver disease more precisely than the Child classification. The mean interval between the first and second transplantation was 316 days (78-725 days). The first three patients, with mean interval of 101 days, died of severe infection combined with multiple organ failure after retransplantation. The patients who underwent retransplantation more than six months after the first transplant had better outcomes. The one-year survival rate for retransplantation in our group was 62.5%. CONCLUSIONS: Liver retransplantation is the only means of saving the patient with hepatic allograft failure. Understanding of the indications for retransplantation,careful selection of operation timing, excellent surgical skills and meticulous postoperative management all contribute to the success of each case of retransplantation.